Indiska aktier står inför uppgång 2018

Indiska aktier står inför uppgång 2018 ETF Börshandlade fonderIndiska aktier står inför uppgång 2018

Indiska aktier och de börshandlade fonder som ger exponering mot landet aktiemarknad kan vara värd att titta på inför 2018. Många analytiker hävdar att indiska aktier står inför uppgång 2018. Redan under 2017 kom landets börs att bidra till att så kallade emerging markets steg kraftigt. Vissa marknadsobservatörer tror att grunden i Asiens tredje största ekonomi stöder en ytterligare uppgång för indiska aktier 2018.

Wisdom Tree India Earnings ETF (NYSE: EPI) och iShares India 50 ETF (NASDAQ: INDY), två av de största börshandlade fonderna dedikerade mot indiska aktier, har i genomsnitt gett en avkastning om 36 procent under 2018, mätt i dollar. Det breda efterföljande MSCI Emerging Markets Indexet är högre med 32,8%.

Lokala investerare rusar mot börsen

I år tyder datapunkter på att lokala investerare rusar in i indiska aktier. Dessutom trycker regeringen på olika pensionsplaner i landet för att öka exponeringen mot aktier. Indiens största aktieindex nådde rekordnivåer. Flera analytiker har uttalat sig om att de ser fortsatta ökningar av företagsvinster. Samtidigt ses frukterna av nationens ekonomiska tillväxt på effekterna av premiärminister Narendra Modis reformer som inkluderade ett valutabanslut i november och en ny rikstäckande skatt på varor och tjänster i juli.

Indiens aktiemarknad led i slutet av 2016 efter att premiärminister Narendra Modi drog tillbaka omkring 86 % av alla pengar från ekonomin för att bekämpa så kallade svarta pengar för att slåss mot den enorma skuggekonomin. Medan ekonomin kan uppleva ett kortsiktigt bakslag från detta kan resultaten av demonetisering leda till långsiktiga fördelar för den indiska ekonomin.

Indiens ekonomi studsade tillbaka från en treårig bottennivå, en ökning med 6,3 procent i juli till september, och resultatet för de 50 Nifty-företagen ökade mer än 14 procent från året innan. Detta är den första tvåsiffriga tillväxten under 13 kvartal. Siffran beräknas stiga 13 procent under oktober-december, enligt data från Bloomberg.

Exceptionell utveckling för indiska småbolag

Indiska småbolag, så kallade small caps, utvecklades exceptionellt bra 2017. Indiska Small Cap ETFer, inklusive Market Vectors India Small Cap Index ETF (NYSEArca: SCIF), EGShares India Small Cap ETF (NYSEArca: SCIN) och iShares MSCI India Small Cap ETF (NYSEArca: SMIN) är bland årets bästa ETFer.

Mer aggressiva investerare som är övertygade om Indien kan leverera har möjligheten till ett haussespel på indiska marknader. Direxion Daily India Bull 3X Aktier (NYSEArca: INDL), ger sina andelsägare 3x eller 300 % den dagliga utvecklingen för indiska aktier.

Coffee offers upside potential in a depressed soft commodity market

Coffee offers upside potential in a depressed soft commodity market

ETF Securities Commodity Research – Coffee offers upside potential in a depressed soft commodity market

Summary

  • Soft commodities are skirting close to their decade-lows set in 2015
  • Apart from Arabica coffee, softs are likely to remain in the doldrums
  • Cane sugar production is high and competition from EU beet sugar will intensify
  • In the absence of a meaningful weather disruption, cocoa production will remain strong

Arabica coffee

Brazil – which accounts for about 45% of global Arabica coffee output – has just completed its 2017/18 harvest. While output was always expected to be lower than last year due to the biennial cycles present in the country, production fell significantly short due to poor weather. Output is likely to be more than 20% below 2016/17 for Brazil (-9 million 60kg bags). Hopes for a rebound in the 2018/19 coffee crop in Brazil have become dimmer as a lack of rain has hampered the flowering of coffee bushes. Although rain has now commenced, it is late and development of new nodes on coffee bushes are likely to remain inadequate.

Mexico and Central America (20% of global production) have commenced their 2017/18 harvest. So far the output from the region looks strong and we could see a 1 million bag increase in production (6%). Production in Mexico Honduras and Nicaragua seems to have improved after years of coffee leaf rust problems, although El Salvador, Guatemala, and Costa Rica are still suffering from this fungus which reduces coffee yields.

Colombia (15% of global production) is likely remain close to last year’s levels which was at a decade high. There has been 30% growth in Colombian production over the past 10 years.

Despite strong production elsewhere, a decline in Brazilian output and weakening prospects for the country this year could act as a catalyst for prices. While in previous years, Brazil has been able to sell abundant stocks from prior years during poor harvests, its stocks have fallen significantly and supply tightness will likely be felt this year.

Brazil: September 2017 rainfall (departure from average 1961-1990 levels)

Sugar

We are likely to end two years of supply deficits this year. Brazil, the largest producer of cane (22% of global production) has seen close to 6% year on year growth in sugar production in the season so far. It’s not that more sugar cane has been cultivated this year, but that more cane has been diverted to sugar production instead of ethanol production. With oil prices trading below US$60/bbl we are unlikely to see a pickup in ethanol production (ethanol is an alternative car fuel in Brazil).

India, the second largest producer of cane sugar (15%) has received heavy rainfall in recent weeks, helping to fill its reservoirs. Although the monsoon rains appeared to have slowed prematurely several weeks ago, rain came back vigorously, leaving the season’s rainfall close to normal levels. Both the area of planting and sugar yield are expected to rise increasing production by more than 15%.

Thailand, has also experienced a good monsoon season which will help it raise its cane sugar production by over 10%.

The European Union is a producer of beet sugar rather than cane sugar. However, the abolition of production and export quotas from the EU this month will mean that there will be more beet sugar available to compete with cane sugar. The EU projects that by 2026 EU sugar production will rise by 6% over 2016 levels. That appears to be an overly conservative estimate. The USDA’s EU office projects EU sugar production to rise 20% in 2017/18 alone, surpassing the 2014/15 high, while exports will rise by a third.

Under such strong supply growth, we don’t see sugar prices making a recovery.

Cocoa

The 2016/17 cocoa year has just completed with an 18% growth in production over the previous year. Milder Harmattan winds this year have significantly reduced crop damage in Africa (where 70% of the world’s cocoa comes from). Stocks have risen 26% over the year, increasing the stocks to grinding ratio from 34% in 2015/16 to 42% in 2016/17.

The main crop harvests commence this month in the largest producing countries (Cote d’Ivoire and Ghana). Weather conditions have so far been perfect indicating we are likely to see another surplus year in 2017/18.
On the demand side, grinding data has been stagnant. Despite weak prices, confectionary companies don’t appear to have reversed the thrifting of cocoa they pursued in previous years when prices were higher.

La Niña risks

The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has increased its probability of a La Niña weather pattern emerging this northern hemisphere winter to 55-60%. However, if the event occurs it is unlikely to change our view of price direction considerably. The weather pattern is likely to be weak if it emerges at all. If anything we expect that dryness in Brazil will continue to hamper the flowering and budding process for coffee (which will continue to be price positive).Dryness in Brazil could promote the gains in sucrose content of cane if accompanied by more sunlight, raising the yield for Brazilian sugar (remaining price negative).

Coolness in West Africa could reduce heat damage, helping to sustain high yields (price negative). But we caution that previous La Ninas have not consistently been production-positive for the crop. According to the International Cocoa Organisation, while El Niños have a statistically significant positive effect on output, La Niña’s positive effects on output fail to be statistically significant.

For more information contact:

Catarina Donat Marques
ETF Securities (UK) Limited
T +44 20 7448 4386
E catarina.donatmarques@etfsecurities.com

Important Information

This communication has been issued and approved for the purpose of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 by ETF Securities (UK) Limited (“ETFS UK”) which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”).

The information contained in this communication is for your general information only and is neither an offer for sale nor a solicitation of an offer to buy securities. This communication should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance and any investments may go down in value.

This document is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or any other step in furtherance of a public offering of shares or securities in the United States or any province or territory thereof. Neither this document nor any copy hereof should be taken, transmitted or distributed (directly or indirectly) into the United States.

This communication may contain independent market commentary prepared by ETFS UK based on publicly available information. Although ETFS UK endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the content in this communication, ETFS UK does not warrant or guarantee its accuracy or correctness. Any third party data providers used to source the information in this communication make no warranties or representation of any kind relating to such data. Where ETFS UK has expressed its own opinions related to product or market activity, these views may change. Neither ETFS UK, nor any affiliate, nor any of their respective officers, directors, partners, or employees accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication or its contents.

ETFS UK is required by the FCA to clarify that it is not acting for you in any way in relation to the investment or investment activity to which this communication relates. In particular, ETFS UK will not provide any investment services to you and or advise you on the merits of, or make any recommendation to you in relation to, the terms of any transaction. No representative of ETFS UK is authorised to behave in any way which would lead you to believe otherwise. ETFS UK is not, therefore, responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients and you should seek your own independent legal, investment and tax or other advice as you see fit.

 

 

En tidigare favorit för emerging markets placerare

En tidigare favorit för emerging markets placerare

Brasilien och landets aktiemarknad var tidigare en favorit för emerging markets placerare. Bland de landsspecifika börshandlade fonder som replikerar aktiemarknaderna bland emerging markets finns det några namn som sticker ut. Att de får uppmärksamhet beror på både bra och dåliga orsaker. Under det senaste året har till exempel iShares MSCI Brazil Capped ETF (NYSEArca: EWZ) och Market Vectors Russia ETF (NYSEArca: RSX) uppmärksammats av totalt fel orsaker, medan WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (NYSEArca: EPI) fungerar som ständig påminnelse för investerarna att det finns bra möjligheter hos tillväxtmarknadsekonomierna.

iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (NYSEArca: EWM) kan inte konkurrera med EWZ eller EPI vare sig när det gäller förvaltad volym eller när det gäller berömmelse, men det finns de som anser att det finns en sannolik att aktiemarknaden i Malaysia är redo att skapa positiva tidningsrubriker i år.

Under 2014 backade denna börshandlade fond med 14 procent under tiden som S&P 500 steg med elva procent. Under 2015 störtdök iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (NYSEArca: EWM) och gick från 13,41 USD till 7,52 procent, en nedgång med 44 procent. Under samma tidsperiod var S&P 500 indexet i stort sett oförändrat.

Mätt mot iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEArca: EEM), den börshandlade fond som brukar användas som en proxy för emerging markets har EWM en blandad utveckling. Under denna period har EWM överträffat utvecklingen för EEM tre gånger under de senaste sex åren. EEM har allokerat 3,5 procent av sitt kapital till Malaysias aktiemarknad.

Under 2015 backade EEM med ganska precis 20 procent, en nedgång som var utmärkande för så gott som alla emerging markets, men betydligt bättre än vad EWM mäktade med. EWM backade under samma period mer än dubbelt så mycket som EEM, minus 44 procent.

Det finns ändå skäl att titta på Malaysias börs

Trots de senaste årens kursfall finns det skäl att titta närmare på EWM. Landets premiärminister Najib Razak har skurit ner på statliga subventioner för att begränsa de finanspolitiska riskerna i ett försök att styra landet mot höginkomsttagarstatus och mer mot inhemsk konsumtion. Den inhemska Konsumtionen står nu för mer än hälften av Malaysias bruttonationalprodukt. Kommer detta att räcka för att EWM åter skall bli en favorit för emerging markets placerare?

Fundamentals Return to Emerging Markets

Fundamentals Return to Emerging Markets

Fundamentals Return to Emerging Markets. This past quarter has been one of more twists and turns in macro factors than we can, perhaps, remember. Commodities went from being some of the worst performing and under-held assets in January to the complete opposite in February and March. The Federal Reserve has ”walked back” from its previous more hawkish interest rate projections and, as a result, the U.S. dollar declined dramatically. This has taken the pressure off some of the weaker emerging markets currencies, which have seen impressive rallies. It appears that many emerging markets investors have rushed to sell popular investments in India and China to return to more globally cyclical driven markets, companies that have benefited from the rebound in commodities, and higher beta currencies. This caused significant performance idiosyncrasies among countries in the emerging markets complex in the first quarter.

1Q 2016 EM Equity Strategy Review and Positioning

We believe long-term followers of our strategy will understand that panic followed by euphoria rarely provides a favorable backdrop for outperformance by our highly disciplined all-cap strategy, as both size and growth characteristics tend to be penalized in short periods of panic. Poor quality and cyclical factors, which our strategy generally avoids, tend to outperform everything in the first innings of euphoria. It is important to point out that the cause of our potential underperformance during these short periods is often due to what we do not own (i.e., what we deem to be very large, poor quality cyclical companies) as much as it is indicative of what we do own — you might think of it as partial giveback of our previous outperformance.

Financials and Consumer Staples Provide Boost; Industrials and Tech Detract

During the first quarter of 2016, stock selection in financials and consumer staples aided performance relative to the MSCI Emerging Markets Index1 benchmark, while selection in industrials and information technology detracted. The absence of allocations to the energy and materials sectors also hurt the strategy’s relative performance.

On a country level, China was the main detractor from performance followed by Russia and India. Peru, the Philippines, and Colombia gave the strategy’s relative performance a boost.

1Q Top Performers

The top five performing companies in the strategy came from around the globe. BB Seguridade Participacoes SA2, the insurance arm of Banco do Brasil, the largest Latin America-based bank, as a Brazilian real holding, was helped significantly by the rebound in the Brazilian market during the quarter. It’s a structural growth story. The company continues to display strong execution, in line with our growth thesis. In addition to its improving asset quality, consistent performance, and asset growth, Peruvian financial holding company Credicorp3 benefited from the turnaround in the Peruvian market. This followed the second half of 2015 when uncertainty as to whether the country would be reclassified by MSCI indexers weighed heavily on its stocks. Yes Bank4, a high-quality, private sector Indian bank, benefited from both improving loan growth and widening lending spreads. These have resulted in significant results, as has the bank’s focus on retail, as opposed to commercial, business opportunities. The stock price of Robinsons Retail Holdings5, the Philippines’ second largest multi-format retailer, made up most of its decline from the last quarter after full-year 2015 results came in largely in line with consensus, backing up our growth thesis. Although a global leader and structural growth story in its own right, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company6, the undisputed global leader in integrated circuit (IC) manufacturing, also benefitted from cyclical factors in the first quarter. There were earnings upgrades driven by greater short-term visibility and asset utilization from improved traction with key customers. Additionally, there was a multiple lift as investors also favored businesses that benefited from global cyclical tailwinds.

Chinese Stocks Suffer in 2016

Given that Chinese stocks suffered during the quarter, it is perhaps not surprising that four of the five biggest detractors from our strategy’s performance were Chinese. Following a slight change in its business model, Chinese company Boer Power Holdings7, which provides electrical distribution solutions, is facing, in our opinion, increased business risk. The company’s leverage increased as it took on higher levels of accounts receivable. We continue to believe, however, that the company will continue to be a beneficiary of the development of a smarter grid in China. Luxoft Holding8 is a high-end information technology services provider, primarily to the financial services industry, with its programmers largely situated in the ex-Soviet Union countries, which are referred to as Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). During the quarter, the company reported lower than expected numbers, largely related to the pulling of a key contract by a client. Chinese company Wasion Group Holdings9, like Boer Power Holdings, is in the business of improving the efficiency of power use, an area of activity we still believe displays convincing fundamentals. The company is setting the standard for ”smart” electrical grid meters in the country. During the quarter, however, it suffered from the fallout created by the adjustment and lengthening of payment timelines on certain government contracts. Along with a number of others, JD.com10, one of the Fund’s internet holdings, suffered from the widespread exit from the Chinese market during the quarter, giving back some of its outperformance of the previous year. However, the company continues to reflect, in our opinion, the considerable strength of the growth opportunities in the e-commerce sector in China. CAR Inc11 is the largest auto rental company in China and provides vehicles to U-Car, a partner providing ”Uber-like” chauffeured car services in China. The issues around this company, and its recent poor performance, center on uncertainty surrounding the regulatory environment that has led U-Car to scale back its investment, and thus use fewer CAR Inc vehicles. We are monitoring this situation closely.

We Don’t Respond to Short-Term Macro Events

As we always strive to emphasize, we are fundamentally a bottom-up strategy, first and foremost. However, we do like to give a sense of where the strategy is positioned in terms of country and sector. Please bear in mind that a higher weighting in a country may not necessarily mean extra exposure to that country’s risk, as certain holdings may be negatively correlated to the local currency or positively correlated to local rates.

Because we don’t respond to shorter-term macro events such as oil and Brazilian politics, our weightings do not tend to move as materially as those of many of our peers. We simply don’t speculate on short-term movements or cyclical factors — we invest in well-researched, long-term structural growth businesses at attractive valuations. We maintain that this process and philosophy have historically returned and, we hope, may continue to return, what we consider pleasing long-term performance. However, our long-term performance may be punctuated by short periods when the asset class underperforms for mostly technical reasons.

We continue to be overweight in China, India, and Brazil, while still significantly underweight in South Korea. Taiwan still has a relatively light weighting, although it is home to a couple of our larger positions. South Africa is still also underweight, but less so than in prior years, as weakness in the rand has encouraged us to make further investment in domestically-oriented companies, while outperformance of Naspers12 has also increased our weighting in the country.

Healthcare and Financials Offer Structural Growth Opportunities

By sector, we have maintained the persistent biases that you can expect from our philosophy of structural growth at a reasonable price. Energy and materials are very difficult places for us to find good, persistent growth, while much of the telecommunication and utility sectors are not showing us much growth at all. Consumer staples, a natural area to look for structural growth, has largely proven to be too expensive for our taste in the last few years, and this remains the case.

We remain overweight in healthcare, clearly a long run structural growth industry as consumers in emerging markets dedicate a higher percentage of their increasing disposable income to healthcare spending. Financials remain a large weighting for the strategy, but the investments we choose in this sector are very specific, usually by country, and focus on persistent structural trends such as microfinance, ”banking the unbanked” and specialty insurance.

Emerging Markets Outlook

Experience informs us that this kind of environment rarely persists for more than a quarter or two before rational fundamentals reassert themselves and investments in quality companies with genuinely sustainable operating profitability and attractive valuations reassert their leadership. In a more ”normal” environment, our strategy has historically tended to do quite well in our estimation.

Eyeing Brazil with Interest

We are watching Brazil with great interest. The political situation there remains extremely fluid. The incumbent socialist administration looks increasingly likely to be replaced by a more market friendly, reformist coalition. This expectation has resulted in a sharp recovery in current share prices and the country’s currency. We steadily increased positions throughout last year because valuations became more and more attractive and have been somewhat rewarded for this — only somewhat, because the rebound has been led, so far, by large-cap commodity names such as Petrobras and Vale14, which do not align with our structural growth at a reasonable price (SGARP) philosophy and process.

Lower But Better Growth in China

China began the year with very negative headlines centering on the likelihood of a sharp depreciation of its currency and fears of an imminent debt-fueled crisis. We, on the other hand, continue to expect lower but better growth, monetary and fiscal easing, and a gradually weakening renminbi, but no crisis. Our base case is for modest cyclical recovery in China’s economy in the first half of 2016 that could allow more room for further significant structural reforms, with more emphasis on the supply-side of the economy, rather than attempts simply to ”juice up” demand. We do believe, however, that more credit ”issues” are likely as the tidying up of highly indebted, state owned entities continues. As we regularly remind emerging markets investors, our strategy has very little exposure to the old, smokestack/state-owned enterprise (SOE) complex13, and we continue to favor long-term, structural growth opportunities in environmental services, internet, healthcare, tourism, and insurance.

Performance Led by Technicals in India

India was the other market where we experienced some negative performance over the quarter. Again, we would make the case that this was partly for technical reasons related to positioning. We remain optimistic about the Indian companies in which the strategy is currently invested, despite the country falling out of favor in relative terms.

Accelerating Growth in Peru

After several months facing a challenging scenario with lower commodity prices, the outlook for Peru started to improve. Growth in the country has been accelerating, driven by the mining and infrastructure sector. There is uncertainty regarding the outcome of the presidential election. It seems that the most likely scenario is that former-president Alberto Fujimori will win in the second round. Finally, there seems to be a consensus view that Peru has a big chance of avoiding MSCI reclassification to Frontier Market which could act as an additional driver to Peruvian equities.

Can Colombia Tough Out Low Oil Prices?

Colombia continues to be negatively affected by the low level of oil prices, the uncertain fiscal adjustment, and expectations for the peace process. In our view, the government needs to approve a fiscal reform in order to address some important topics that will allow the country to achieve its fiscal target amid lower prices and low level of reserves. The government is waiting for the completion of the peace process to have the necessary political capital to proceed with an honest fiscal reform (this will be decisive to preserve the sovereign rating). There will likely be some slowdown in activity in 2016 with GDP growth expectations of around 2.7% versus 3.1% in 2015. There are some factors such as the beginning of the 4G mobile technology infrastructure program and the positive reaction of some tradeable sectors to a higher exchange rate that should partially offset the tough scenario for the economy given currently low oil prices.

We Believe Structural Growth is Reliable and Sustainable

In general, we see valuations for our focus list companies, after the recent rally, as fair, without being materially cheap. As we noted at the end of 2015, we are now seeing, as expected, some better economic numbers out of China, which is a notable bright spot. In addition, we would also point out that the growth of our strategy has been structural in nature and, arguably, quite reliable; as such, we expect it to compound over the course of time, with little cyclical risk associated with the world and market volatility we live with today.

Emerging Markets Equity

April 18, 2016

by David Semple, Portfolio Manager

Semple is a veteran of emerging markets (EM) investing, and has more than 25 years of experience.  Uniquely informed by having lived and worked in several emerging markets, Semple’s EM expertise includes successfully establishing investment processes and frameworks, leading teams of analysts, and marketing to a global investor base.

Post Disclosure

1 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) Emerging Markets Index captures large and mid cap representation across 23 Emerging Markets (EM) countries. With 836 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. This index is unmanaged and does not reflect the payment of transaction costs, advisory fees or expenses that are associated with an investment in specific investment Fund. An index’s performance is not illustrative of a Fund’s performance. Indices are not securities in which investments can be made.

For a complete listing of the holdings in Van Eck Emerging Markets Fund (the ”Fund”) as of 3/31/16, please click on this PDF. Please note that these are not recommendations to buy or sell any security.

2 BB Seguridade Participacoes SA represented 3.2% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
3 Credicorp represented 2.4% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
4 Yes Bank represented 2.4% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
5 Robinsons Retail Holdings represented 2.2% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
6 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company represented 2.5% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
7 Boer Power Holdings represented 0.6% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
8 Luxoft Holdings represented 1.6% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
9 Wasion Group Holdings represented 0.7% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
10 JD.com represented 3.1% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
11 CAR Inc represented 1.5% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
12 Naspers represented 3.4% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
13 State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) is a legal entity created by a government with the purpose to partake in commercial activities on the government’s behalf.
14Petrobras and Vale were not held by the Fund as of 3/31/16.

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE

This content is published in the United States for residents of specified countries. Investors are subject to securities and tax regulations within their applicable jurisdictions that are not addressed on this content. Nothing in this content should be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell shares of any investment in any jurisdiction where the offer or solicitation would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction, nor is it intended as investment, tax, financial, or legal advice. Investors should seek such professional advice for their particular situation and jurisdiction.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the speakers and are current as of the posting date. Videos and commentaries are general in nature and should not be construed as investment advice. Opinions are subject to change with market conditions. All performance information is historical and is not a guarantee of future results.

Please note that Van Eck Securities Corporation offers investment portfolios that invest in the asset class(es) mentioned in this commentary. The Emerging Markets Equity strategy is subject to the risks associated with its investments in emerging markets securities, which tend to be more volatile and less liquid than securities traded in developed countries. The Emerging Markets Equity strategy’s investments in foreign securities involve risks related to adverse political and economic developments unique to a country or a region, currency fluctuations or controls, and the possibility of arbitrary action by foreign governments, including the takeover of property without adequate compensation or imposition of prohibitive taxation. The Emerging Markets Equity strategy is subject to risks associated with investments in derivatives, illiquid securities, and small or mid-cap companies. The Emerging Markets Equity strategy is also subject to inflation risk, market risk, non-diversification risk, and leverage risk. Please see the prospectus and summary prospectus for information on these and other risk considerations.

You can obtain more specific information on VanEck strategies by visiting Investment Strategies.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. An investor should consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of any investment strategy carefully before investing. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Van Eck Securities Corporation.

The latest IMFs report highlights how important emerging markets are

The latest IMFs report highlights how important emerging markets are

The latest IMFs report highlights how important emerging markets are. Developments in emerging markets (EMs) account for more than a third of the variations in stock market and foreign exchange market returns worldwide, according to the IMF’s Global Financial Stability Report released last Monday. The financial spillovers – the extent to which EM equity returns are reflected in developed markets equity returns – have risen 28% (IMF estimates). For the largest emerging economies (Brazil, China, India, Russia and South Africa), they have risen by 40%. The spillovers on bond markets are less clear because bond flows have been strongly affected by monetary policies in advanced economies.
(click to enlarge)

Why do EMs get so much attention today? It is because EMs are far more invested now than ever, with the financial crisis being a catalyst to investor diversification. EMs share of global equity market capitalization more than doubled in the last twenty years amid declining market segmentation. The growing trend in EM financial integration is likely to continue until reaching a level consistent with the extent of their contribution to the global economy. EMs contribute to 38% to the global GDP but represent only 13% of the global financial system, according to data compiled by the IMF.

EM’s role in the global financial system is likely to continue to grow at a steady pace along with EM’s share in investors’ portfolios. First, EMs have demonstrated financial and economic resilience despite financial turbulences. Second, the quantitative easing programmes from developed economies have accelerated their integration into the global financial system by pouring liquidity into EMs. We believe the unconventional central bank policies are not likely to terminate any time soon. When they eventually end, it most certainly will not be in an abrupt manner. For these reasons, we think EMs are becoming a permanent and an influential financial players. In our view, current credit spreads are overcompensating investors for the credit and liquidity risks.

Morgane Delledonne, Fixed Income Strategist at ETF Securities

Morgane Delledonne joined ETF Securities as Fixed Income Strategist in 2016. Morgane has an extensive experience in Monetary policy, Fixed Income Markets and Macroeconomics gained at the French Treasury’s Office in Washington DC and most recently in her role as Macroeconomist and Strategist at Pictet&Cie in Geneva. Morgane holds a Bachelor of Applied Mathematics from the University of Nice Sophia Antipolis (France), a Master of Economics and Finance Engineering and a Master of Economic Diagnosis from the University of Paris Dauphine (France).