Will Eurozone bonds go ‘back to the future’?

Will Eurozone bonds go ‘back to the future’? WisdomTreeHeadlines surrounding the Italian budget saga and sovereign debt ratings have certainly garnered their fair share of interest within the global bond markets. Interestingly, the heightened anxiety level has produced fears of another potential contagion event, as investors witnessed during the ‘Grexit’ 1 episode. Naturally, that has raised the question of whether Eurozone bond markets could experience a “back to the future” moment; in other words, reliving the past.

When contemplating the possibility of such a scenario developing, it is rather useful to examine how various Eurozone sovereign debt markets have behaved in this latest bout of uncertainty, more specifically looking at the countries that were full participants in the Grexit contagion event (Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland). These four nations were deemed the periphery countries of the Eurozone, and as the reader will recall, were at the centre of concern, not only if Greece elected to leave the Euro, but also due to their own respective fiscal/financial challenges at the time.

Figure 1: 10-year government bond yield spreads vs. German bunds

Source: Bloomberg, WisdomTree, 29 October 2018. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance and any investments may go down in value. Note: Ireland bond data was discontinued between 11 October 2011 15 March 2013.

The initial results are in, and thus far, the concerns raised regarding Italy have been confined to Italy and have not yet spread to the other three aforementioned countries. A valuable tool in discerning potential ‘contagion’ fears lies in the yield difference, or spread, between an asset that is viewed as being more of a safe-haven, such as the 10-year German Bund and the like maturity sovereign issues of the other countries in question. As figure 1 clearly reveals, this most recent bout of concern has stood in stark contrast to the Grexit experience. Indeed, the ‘Grexit experience’ really captures the issues that were confronting not just Greece, but the other four periphery countries as well and lasted from roughly mid-2010 to mid-2013 or so.

Let’s look at some the numbers or spread levels for perspective. The peak period of duress was captured between 2011 and 2012. At that time, Portugal experienced the most notable spread widening versus the bund, with the peak differential ballooning out +1560 basis points (bp) in January 2012. For Spain and Italy, the peak readings were +639bp and +553bp, respectively. So, where are we now? The Portugal 10-year spread stands at +150bp as of this writing, with Spain coming in a bit narrower at +117bp. On a year-to-date basis, both readings are essentially unchanged. Examining developments from a more recent context when the Italian budget and credit rating news started making front-page headlines in late September, the Spanish 10-year spread widened out only 19bp, while for Portugal the increase was also on the more modest side of 16bp. What about Italy? The Italian 10-year BTP/bunds spread has risen by almost +140bp year-to-date, and +65bp from late September.

Where do we go from here? The recent actions from both Moody’s and S&P ratings agencies seem to have lifted a veil of uncertainty on the Italian government bond market, at least for now. For the record, Moody’s did lower the actual rating for Italy a notch to Baa3, but shifted their outlook to ‘stable’. For S&P, the rating itself was left unchanged at BBB, however the outlook was downgraded to ‘negative’. In the immediate aftermath of the S&P announcement, the Italian 10-year yield fell 35bp from its most recent peak, with the BTP/bund spread narrowing 25bp.

Conclusion

Despite the fact the worst credit rating fears were not realized, the potential for continued negative headlines has not been removed. To be sure, S&P noted the Italian budget outlook will remain a key area of contention in their lowering of the sovereign outlook. The EU’s ‘negative opinion’ regarding Italy’s budget will more than likely be a saga that continues to play out. In fact, the recent disappointing print of zero growth in Q3 GDP quarter/quarter does not bode well on the budget front either. While contagion is always a risk if developments were to spiral downward from here, the lack of a clear-cut trend for the other periphery countries up to this point has been somewhat encouraging but stay tuned the outlook remains a volatile one.

All data from Bloomberg as of 29 October 2018.

1 Refers to Greece’s possible withdrawal from the Eurozone, which made frequent news headlines from 2012 to 2015.

By Kevin Flanagan

This material is prepared by WisdomTree and its affiliates and is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of the date of production and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by WisdomTree, nor any affiliate, nor any of their officers, employees or agents. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

A mixed outlook for commodities in 2018

A mixed outlook for commodities in 2018

Commodities have enjoyed a great start to 2018, from the low point mid-December they have rallied 6.5%, the performance has been broad-based too, driven not only by the Iran issues inflating the oil price but a rally in industrial/precious metals and agriculture. A mixed outlook for commodities in 2018.

We are wary of some who are interpreting this as being a positive sign for broad commodities this year. Commodities as an asset class are a very heterogeneous group and we expect varied performance from each. So to start the year we thought we would provide a brief summary of our views.

Gold

Although we expect the Fed to continue to tighten policy, we think the downside risks to gold prices are limited because real interest rates will remain depressed as inflation gains pace in the US. However, a shock event, such as an equity market correction, could force gold prices higher. On balance we see little change in gold prices in the coming year. Investors continue to be optimistic about gold despite the rising interest rate environment, we believe this is due to investors now seeing gold as an insurance policy from geopolitical concerns rather than investment.

Gold price Forecast

Most of the variation in gold price in our bull and bear cases (compared to our base case) comes from assumptions around investor positioning. Many measures of market volatility are currently subdued. However, several risks – both political and financial – exist. Sentiment towards gold could shift significantly depending on which of these views dominate market psyche.

In our bull case scenario, where we would see a more dovish Fed, gold could rise to US$1420. There are also numerous risks which can push demand for gold futures higher:

• Continued sabre-rattling between US/Japan/South Korea and North Korea;
• The proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran escalates;
• A disorderly unwind of credit in China;
• Italian policy paralysed by the inability to form a government after the election;
• Catalonian independence pushing Spain close to civil war
• A potential second general election in Germany; and
• Market volatility measures such as the VIX (equity), MOVE (bond) spike as yield-trades unwind

In our bear case, we assume the Fed delivers four rates hikes in 2018 as it tries to anchor inflation expectations. 10-year nominal Treasury yields rise to 3.3% by the end of the year, while the US dollar appreciates. By year-end inflation falls back to 1.6%. In this scenario we assume that the absence of any geopolitical risk or adverse financial market shock. In this scenario gold could fall to US$1110/oz by end of 2018.

Crude Oil

In 2018, US production will likely hit an all-time high, surpassing the cycle peak reached before the price war in 2014 and above the 10 million barrel mark last hit in 1970. There is little indication that the backwardation in futures curves is going to stop US production from expanding. Unless investors are constantly reminded of geopolitical risks, the price premium tends to evaporate within a matter of weeks.

Inventories have been declining across the OECD although we are unlikely to see the decline in inventories continue. US shale oil production can break-even at close to US$40/bbl. With WTI oil currently trading at US$60/bbl, there is plenty of headroom for profitability and we expect a strong expansion in supply.

Break even by play

In late 2017, OPEC and its 10 non-OPEC partners posted their best level of compliance with the production curb deal to date. We think that compliance in the extended deal announced end-November will fall short of expectations in 2018. Russia’s insistence on discussing an exit strategy and a review in June 2018 indicates that the patience of non-OPEC partners in the deal is wearing thin.

With the US expanding supply and OPEC likely to under deliver on its promise to consistently curb production, we expect the supply to grow. At the same time demand is unlikely to continue to grow at the current pace, with prices having gained 33% over the past year.

We expect the oil price to remain in a range from US$45 to US$60/bbl for 2018, although a significant geopolitical upset in the Middle East could cause temporary price spikes.

Industrial Metals

We expect the star performer for 2018 to be industrial metals. They are likely to benefit the most from improving EM growth, at the same time we expect supply to remain in deficit in 2018 as the lack of investment in mining infrastructure continues to bite.

Emerging market (EM) demand is crucial for commodity markets as they represent 70% of industrial metals demand. In this respect, we expect any weakness in commodity prices to be largely offset by solid demand growth, again led by China. Although concerns remain over the build-up of debt, Chinese policymakers have continued to show a willingness to support the financial system with stimulus to ease financial conditions.

Since industrial metal prices began to fall in 2011, capital expenditure by miners collapsed. In mid-2017 capital expenditure by the largest 100 mines was 60% lower than in mid-2013. Given the long lag times behind investment and completion of mines, we don’t expect the tightness of mine supply to reverse any time soon.

Miners have been cautious to increase spending as they wait for the price recovery to prove sustainable. Historically we have seen about a year-long lag between a recovery in price and a recovery in capital spending. It is likely in 2018, as commodity prices continue to rise, that we see capital expenditure growth turn positive, although the damage of 4 years of lack of investment in to mining infrastructure has already occurred and is why industrial metals remain in a supply deficit.

Miners margin vs Supply/Demand

Historically we have found that metal markets begin to move towards a balance two years after miner profit margins hit rock-bottom. Miner margins fell to a low of 2% at the beginning of 2016 and since have recovered to just over 7%. So if we see a repeat of historical patterns, we should see supply begin to improve in late 2018, but it could take years to move back into balance.

James Butterfill, Head of Research & Investment Strategy at ETF Securities

James Butterfill joined ETF Securities as Head of Research & Investment Strategy in 2015. James is responsible for leading the strategic direction of the global research team, ensuring that clients receive up-to-date, expert insight into global macroeconomic and asset class specific developments.

James has a wealth of experience in strategy, economics and asset allocation gained at HSBC and most recently in his role as Multi- Asset Fund Manager and Global Equity Strategist at Coutts. James holds a Bachelor of Engineering from the University of Exeter and an MSc in Geophysics from Keele University.

European equities aren’t the great value play they once were

European equities aren’t the great value play they once were

European equities aren’t the great value play they once were. We saw a 9% downgrade in Q1 earnings growth forecasts over the quarter, the largest since late 2014, echoing the downgrades we saw in the US. Regardless, results still missed expectations, with 69% falling short of earnings forecasts, after 70% of companies having reported. European equities aren’t the great value play they once were

Overall net income was flat but revenues were the weakest since Q1 2012, ending what has been a fairly good run for European earnings since then.

Its been core Europe where the weakness stems, primarily Germany, Netherlands and France whilst the periphery, such as Spain, Italy and Ireland have held out relatively well.

We suspect that some of the weakness has been due to the resilience of the EUR as much of the weakness has stemmed from more internationally focused sectors such as tech and consumer sectors. Whilst industrials missed expectations, quarter-on-quarter growth in this sector has been the strongest, followed by utilities.

Despite a mixed picture for the banking sector, we are seeing loan growth along with a fall in non-performing loans (NPLs). NPLs have fallen by 2.1% percentage points since this time last year, to 8% which is well below the 13% peak reached in 2014. But bear in mind, 8% is still well above its international counterparts which are all sub 3%.

We still expect the EUR strength to remain in coming quarters and is likely to continue to negatively impact the export market. This comes at a time when European earnings and valuations are now close to their long term trend. We are not saying that the poor earnings season indicates that the European economic recovery has been derailed. However, we no longer believe that Europe is a great value play.

James Butterfill, Head of Research & Investment Strategy at ETF Securities

James Butterfill joined ETF Securities as Head of Research & Investment Strategy in 2015. James is responsible for leading the strategic direction of the global research team, ensuring that clients receive up-to-date, expert insight into global macroeconomic and asset class specific developments.

James has a wealth of experience in strategy, economics and asset allocation gained at HSBC and most recently in his role as Multi- Asset Fund Manager and Global Equity Strategist at Coutts. James holds a Bachelor of Engineering from the University of Exeter and an MSc in Geophysics from Keele University.

The Flow Whisperer – TAARSS says Europe, Spain, US Large Caps, and Treasuries

The Flow Whisperer – TAARSS says Europe, Spain, US Large Caps, and Treasuries

Deutsche Bank – Synthetic Equity & Index Strategy – Global

The Flow Whisperer – TAARSS says Europe, Spain, US Large Caps, and Treasuries
04 June 2014 (13 pages/ 336 kb)

Download the complete report

Tactical Asset Allocation Relative Strength Signal (TAARSS) Monthly Update

Market review

Despite a slow start, global equities (ACWI) rallied into the end of the month and recorded gains of 2.01% for the month of May. In turn, US bonds (AGG) advanced 1.18% steadily throughout the month driven by a pull-back in rates; while Commodities dropped by 1.44% due to sustained weakness during last month.

TAARSS rotation strategy monthly performance review

Our Market, US Size, Fixed Income Sector, and Commodity Sector rotation strategies outperformed their respective benchmarks in May; while the Region and DM country rotation strategies lagged their respective benchmarks (Figure 1). Within equities, EM (2.95%), US Large Caps (2.32%), Asia Pacific (3.54%), and Hong Kong (4.68%) were the strongest performers per strategy; while Energy (0.74%) and EM Debt (3.47%) were the top categories within commodities and fixed income, respectively during the same period.

Tactical positioning for June 2014

For the month of June, TAARSS equity positioning indicates a preference for Large Caps within the US, Europe among regions, International DM for market allocations, and Spain for DM countries. In terms of fixed income sectors, TAARSS favors US Treasuries, albeit we are slightly cautious about this specific signal. Last but not least, diversified broad exposure is the chosen one for the current month. As a reminder, the preferred quarterly multi asset TAARSS allocation is Fixed Income during Q2.

Utveckling olika investeringar (1-5 feb)

Utveckling olika investeringar (1-5 feb)

Utveckling olika investeringar (1-5 feb). Veckan som gick. Veckan avslutades svagt. Dow Jones gick ner med 0,5% under veckan. S&P 500 gick ner med 0,7% och Nasdaq gick ner med 0,3%.

Utvecklingen i Europa och Asien var också negativ. De europeiska marknaden gick ner med 3,8% och i Asien var nedgången 2%. Latinamerika gick ner i linje med Asien, cirka 2%. Bäst utveckling hade Canada med en utveckling om 0,3%. Sämsta landet var Spanien med en nedgång om 7,3%. Den bästa sektorn var naturgas (”natural gas”) med en uppgång på 7,4%. Den sämsta sektorn var silver (”silver”) med en nedgång på 6,3%.

De tre amerikanska ETF:erna med den bästa utvecklingen under veckan var*:

– United States Natural Gas (ticker UNG), 7,4%

– Market Vectors Gold Miners (ticker GDX),  4%

– iShares S&P Semiconductor (ticker UUP), 2,1%.

De tre amerikanska ETF:erna med den sämsta utvecklingen under veckan var*:

– iShares MSCI Spain (ticker EWP),  -7,3%

–  iShares MSCI Turkey (ticker TUR), -7,2,%

– First Trust Global Wind Energy (ticker FAN),  -7%