Oil: Backwardation to the future

Oil: Backwardation to the future Wisdomtree

Oil futures curves have been in backwardation – when the closer futures contract can be sold for a higher price than it costs to buy a futures contract with a further expiry date, resulting in a profit for the investor – for most of the past year, driven by perceived tightness in short-term supply1. This has provided investors with ‘roll yield’ on top of the gains made from spot price movements in oil.

While we believe that the oil market is balanced at present, there is supply tightness in specific areas – especially in heavier crudes – and this could be enough to ensure that the oil futures curve remains mostly in backwardation going forward. Here’s a closer look at current oil market supply and demand dynamics.

Oil curve backwardation

Recent curve backwardation has largely been engineered by the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). Since January 2017, the oil cartel has restricted the supply of oil by assigning its members and partners a quota for the amount of oil that they produce. Although the cartel has historically had a poor history of complying with quotas, this time it has done exceptionally well. Part of the reason for this, is that up until June 2018, each country was allocated an individual quota (rather than a group-wide limit) and this helped to restrict oil supply.

Another reason OPEC has done well in complying with quotas is because of unintended production disruptions. Recently, Venezuela has experienced an economic implosion, and this has impacted oil production significantly. Supply disruptions in Libya and Nigeria have also contributed to OPEC supply volatility.

Can backwardation last?

In June 2018, OPEC abandoned individual country quotas, so the level of quota compliance that we have seen over the past year may not last if the organisation reverts to its old ways. This could explain why the very front of the Brent futures curve went back into contango – when it costs more to buy the new futures contract than the amount received from selling the old futures contract – in July and August. Indeed, Saudi Arabia – the largest OPEC nation – has clearly expanded production since the end of the country-quota system, as have other countries.

After going back to an all-backwardated curve, the short end of the curve is now back in contango, a move underpinned by fears of over supply from increasing rig count in the US, as well as delays in the full implementation of sanctions on Iran. Despite those recent developments, we do not expect them to significantly impact long term supply. While the front end of the curve will remain prone to shifts, we do not see it to durably get back to a mostly contangoed curves.

Figure 1: Year-on-year difference in OPEC oil production

Source: Bloomberg, WisdomTree, data available as of close 05 October 2018.
Historical performance is not an indication of future performance and any investments may go down in value.

Tightness concentrated in heavy crudes

In relation to supply disruption, supply of the ‘heavier’ crudes is most at risk, in our view. Venezuela, Iran and Canada produce ‘heavy’ (low API gravity), ‘sour’ (high sulphur) crudes and these countries experienced the bulk of supply disruption this year.

Most of the world’s growth in crude oil supply is currently from US tight oil, which is ‘light’ (high API gravity) and ‘sweet’ (low sulphur). So, even though global oil supply is close to balance at the headline level, growth in oil production is uneven, with declines in supply of heavy crudes, and gains in supply of light crudes2.

Moreover, while US tight oil is seeing supply growth, there are limitations to this growth. Infrastructure needs to grow in lock-step with growth in oil production, and infrastructure limitations could slow the pace at which US shale can help satisfy global oil needs.

Demand remains strong for now

Looking at forecasts from the International Energy Agency (IEA), demand for oil looks set to remain healthy, with the IEA expecting oil demand to grow by 1.4 mb/d in 2018, and 1.5 mb/d in 2019 (following 1.5 mb/d growth in 2017). Over the medium term, the dearth of capital investment in oil production is likely to lead to tightness if demand continues to remain robust.

Oil futures likely to remain in backwardation

While we believe that the market is in balance at present, there is supply tightness in specific areas and this could be enough to ensure that the futures curve remains mostly in backwardation.

We don’t believe that a new wave of supply is forthcoming as a lack of investment in oil exploration and production should keep supply contained, and it may only take another supply shock to Libya or to Canada to cast doubts on supply. We also think that demand will remain robust, assuming today’s bullish demand expectations are not unfounded.

Source

1 For a full description of backwardation, contango, roll yields, spot return, total return, excess return and collateral yield please see Costs and Performance Tab on our ETPedia page.

2 Energy Information Administration, WisdomTree, data available as of 04 October 2019.

This material is prepared by WisdomTree and its affiliates and is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of the date of production and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by WisdomTree, nor any affiliate, nor any of their officers, employees or agents. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

Broad commodity basket ETPs took the lion’s share of flows

Broad commodity basket ETPs took the lion’s share of flows

ETF Securities – Broad commodity basket ETPs took the lion’s share of flows

Highlights

  • Diversified commodity basket ETPs dominate inflows.
  • Softening momentum in global manufacturing data sparked outflows from copper, aluminium and industrial metal basket ETPs.
  • Outflows from gold ETPs rose for the fifth consecutive week amidst a strong US dollar.
  • Crude oil ETPs faced another week of outflows as higher inventory data caused oil prices to decline.

Download the complete report (.pdf)

Inflows into diversified commodity basket ETPs, totalling US$92.5mn surged to their highest level since May 2016. Rising volatility across global financial markets in conjunction with supportive fundamentals for most commodities favours the case for diversifying a portfolio.

Softening momentum in global manufacturing data sparked outflows from copper, aluminium and broad industrial metal basket ETPs worth US$28.9mn, US$11.1mn and US$14.8mn respectively. The decline in Chinese Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) for the manufacturing sector to its lowest level since July 2016 appears to have stoked concerns of future demand for industrial metals, coupled with weaker manufacturing PMI data across US, Europe and UK. Added to that, copper production in Chile, home to the world’s largest copper mining producer, rose 6.3% over the prior year in January providing evidence of rising copper supply. The imposition of trade tariffs by President Trump on steel and aluminium imports generated volatility across industrial metals prompting outflows from industrial metal basket and aluminium ETPs for the first time in three weeks. Nickel ETPs bucked the trend, by recording inflows of US$9.4mn owing to expectations of demand from battery technology.

Outflows from gold ETPs amounting to US$93.8mn rose for the fifth week in a row amidst a strong US dollar. In the first nine weeks of 2018, the overall trend of gold ETP flows has largely been negative. Last week marked the fifth consecutive week of gold ETP outflows as the US dollar strengthened in the aftermath of Federal Reserve chairman Jay Powell’s optimistic view of the US economy and upward trajectory of interest rates. Meanwhile, precious metal basket ETPs garnered inflows worth US$11.1mn for the fifth consecutive week.

Crude oil ETPs faced another week of outflows worth US$15.8mn. Since the start of 2018, there has only been one week of inflows into crude oil ETPs highlighting the ensuing pessimism amongst ETP investors, who have been opportunistically selling into the price rally that began around June 2017. Last week, crude oil prices came under significant pressure owing to an unexpected sharp increase in US crude oil stocks in conjunction with the firmer US dollar. Added to that, weaker manufacturing data in China, known to be the world’s largest crude oil importer, amplified risk aversion amongst investors. The drop in OPEC production to a 10-month low in February failed to counteract the bearish sentiment since it is largely attributable to temporary production shortfalls in Venezuela.

Important Information

General

This communication has been issued and approved for the purpose of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 by ETF Securities (UK) Limited (“ETFS UK”) which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”).
The information contained in this communication is for your general information only and is neither an offer for sale nor a solicitation of an offer to buy securities. This communication should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance and any investments may go down in value.

This document is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or any other step in furtherance of a public offering of shares or securities in the United States or any province or territory thereof. Neither this document nor any copy hereof should be taken, transmitted or distributed (directly or indirectly) into the United States.

This communication may contain independent market commentary prepared by ETFS UK based on publicly available information

This communication may contain independent market commentary prepared by ETFS UK based on publicly available information. Although ETFS UK endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the content in this communication, ETFS UK does not warrant or guarantee its accuracy or correctness. Any third party data providers used to source the information in this communication make no warranties or representation of any kind relating to such data. Where ETFS UK has expressed its own opinions related to product or market activity, these views may change. Neither ETFS UK, nor any affiliate, nor any of their respective officers, directors, partners, or employees accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication or its contents.

ETFS UK is required by the FCA to clarify that it is not acting for you in any way in relation to the investment or investment activity to which this communication relates. In particular, ETFS UK will not provide any investment services to you and or advise you on the merits of, or make any recommendation to you in relation to, the terms of any transaction. No representative of ETFS UK is authorised to behave in any way which would lead you to believe otherwise. ETFS UK is not, therefore, responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients and you should seek your own independent legal, investment and tax or other advice as you see fit.

 

OPEC meeting offering false hope?

OPEC meeting offering false hope?

ETF Securities Research – OPEC meeting offering false hope?

Highlights

  • Diplomatic efforts by Saudi Arabia and Russia prompt hopes for a joint production agreement at the upcoming meeting.
  • Any agreement is likely to be superficial and fail to accelerate rebalancing of the global oil market.
  • The CAD and NOK look set to resume their decline against the US Dollar.

Diplomatic attempts lift oil

OPEC returned to centre stage last Tuesday as news of diplomatic efforts made by Saudi Arabia and Russia to implement a production agreement sparked a 5.7% rally in crude benchmarks. The upcoming OPEC meeting, scheduled for the 30th November, is highly anticipated as it could result in a coordinated production cut by the cartel (as agreed earlier in the year in Algiers) and is therefore a pivotal event in determining the future of both oil prices and associated currencies (CAD & NOK). Historically, OPEC members have been poor at keeping to production limits but on this particular occasion obstacles are even larger as many of the member nations are under considerable financial and political strain. Therefore, it is our view that risks to oil prices remain firmly skewed to the downside and it is increasingly likely that the USD/CAD and USD/NOK will continue on their current upward trend to the end of the year.

Deal or no deal

The preliminary agreement at Algiers was for the oil cartel to reduce production to between 32.5 and 33 million barrels per day (mbpd), with Nigeria, Libya and Venezuela exempt from any arrangement. This would translate into a reduction of oil output of 0.6-1.1mbpd from October levels which, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), would help balance the global oil market earlier than their current estimate of Q3 2017. In theory this is a very bullish prospect for oil prices but in practice imposing a coordinated production limit is complicated; particularly when the aim is to also coerce the likes of key non-OPEC oil producers like Russia to participate.

(Click to enlarge)

Firstly, within OPEC, certain members have already started to show signs of foul play, either by demanding exemption or by inflating reported output figures with the hope of building a safety margin into any agreement. For instance, officials from Iraq have clearly stated that they do not intend to reduce production or participate in any agreement, citing their war on the Islamic State (ISIS) as sufficient reason for exemption. Also, in the latest monthly OPEC publication, the difference in reported output between secondary sources and direct sources totalled a positive 0.54mbpd for Iran and Iraq alone, a huge difference. For those nations that have been offered some form of formal exemption or are seeking it, namely Iraq, Nigeria and Libya, increases in
production has been sharp in recent months (see Figure 1) which increases the burden on Saudi Arabia to curb output. Outside of OPEC group, the higher range of oil prices in the second half of this year has caused the number of active oil rigs in the US to increase by 40% since June and production has started to climb from an October low of 8.45mbpd. All these factors mean that curbing output meaningfully is going to be difficult for OPEC and so any deal that may emerge from the meeting could merely offer false hope. Potential market optimism that results and spurs a rally in oil prices and oil linked currencies is likely to be short lived and could be seen as an opportunity to establish short positions.

Resistance to prove weak

Since the surprise Trump victory, the US Dollar has rallied strongly against the CAD and the NOK to trade at near short term resistance levels. The USD/CAD is retreating from 1.357, a 50% retracement level from the steep decline earlier in the year, while the USD/NOK is near the top of its recent 8-8.5 range. However, we feel as though both these pairs are on strong upward trends and a failure to reach an agreement in Vienna has potential to trigger moves to the upside beyond these resistance levels.

Investors wishing to express the investment views outlined above may consider using the following ETF Securities ETPs:

Currency ETPs

EUR Base

ETFS Long CAD Short EUR (ECAD)
ETFS Short CAD Long EUR (CADE)
ETFS Long NOK Short EUR (EUNO)
ETFS Short NOK Long EUR (NOEU)

GBP Base

ETFS Long CAD Short GBP (GBCA)
ETFS Short CAD Long GBP (CAGB)
ETFS Long NOK Short GBP (GBNO)
ETFS Short NOK Long GBP (NOGB)

USD Base

ETFS Long CAD Short USD (LCAD)
ETFS Short CAD Long USD (SCAD)
ETFS Long NOK Short USD (LNOK)
ETFS Short NOK Long USD (SNOK)

3x

ETFS 3x Long CAD Short EUR (ECA3)
ETFS 3x Short CAD Long EUR (CAE3)

5x

ETFS 5x Long CAD Short EUR (ECA5)
ETFS 5x Short CAD Long EUR (CAE5)

Currency Baskets

ETFS Bullish USD vs Commodity Currency Basket Securities (SCOM)
ETFS Bearish USD vs Commodity Currency Basket Securities (LCOM)

The complete ETF Securities product list can be found here.

*All figures quoted are sourced from Bloomberg unless stated otherwise.

Important Information

This communication has been provided by ETF Securities (UK) Limited (“ETFS UK”) which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”). The products discussed in this document are issued by ETFS Foreign Exchange Limited (“FXL”). FXL is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission.

This communication is only targeted at professional investors. In Switzerland, this communication is only targeted at Regulated Qualified Investors.

The information contained in this communication is for your general information only and is neither an offer for sale nor a solicitation of an offer to buy securities. This communication should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance and any investments may go down in value.

This document is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or any other step in furtherance of a public offering of shares or securities in the United States or any province or territory thereof. Neither this document nor any copy hereof should be taken, transmitted or distributed (directly or indirectly) into the United States.

This communication may contain independent market commentary prepared by ETFS UK based on publicly available information. Although ETFS UK endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the content in this communication, ETFS UK does not warrant or guarantee its accuracy or correctness. Any third party data providers used to source the information in this communication make no warranties or representation of any kind relating to such data. Where ETFS UK has expressed its own opinions related to product or market activity, these views may change. Neither ETFS UK, nor any affiliate, nor any of their respective, officers, directors, partners, or employees accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication or its contents.

ETFS UK is required by the FCA to clarify that it is not acting for you in any way in relation to the investment or investment activity to which this communication relates. In particular, ETFS UK will not provide any investment services to you and or advise you on the merits of, or make any recommendation to you in relation to, the terms of any transaction. No representative of ETFS UK is authorised to behave in any way which would lead you to believe otherwise. ETFS UK is not, therefore, responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients and you should seek your own independent legal, investment and tax or other advice as you see fit.

Short and/or leveraged exchange-traded products are only intended for investors who understand the risks involved in investing in a product with short and/or leveraged exposure and who intend to invest on a short term basis. Potential losses from short and leveraged exchange-traded products may be magnified in comparison to products that provide an unleveraged exposure. Please refer to the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the relevant prospectus for further details of these and other risks.

Securities issued by FXL are direct, limited recourse obligations of FXL alone and are not obligations of or guaranteed by any of Morgan Stanley & Co International plc, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, any of their affiliates or anyone else or any of their affiliates. Each of Morgan Stanley & Co International plc and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated disclaims all and any liability whether arising in tort, contract or otherwise (save as referred to above) which it might have in respect of this document or its contents otherwise arising in connection herewith.

The Morgan Stanley Indices are the exclusive property of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (”Morgan Stanley”). Morgan Stanley and the Morgan Stanley index names are service mark(s) of Morgan Stanley or its affiliates and have been licensed for use for certain purposes by ETF Securities Limited in respect of the securities issued by FXL. The securities issued by FXL are not sponsored, endorsed, or promoted by Morgan Stanley, and Morgan Stanley bears no liability with respect to any such financial securities. The prospectus of FXL contains a more detailed description of the limited relationship Morgan Stanley has with FXL and any related financial securities. No purchaser, seller or holder of securities issued by FXL, or any other person or entity, should use or refer to any Morgan Stanley trade name, trademark or service mark to sponsor, endorse, market or promote this product without first contacting Morgan Stanley to determine whether Morgan Stanley’s permission is required. Under no circumstances may any person or entity claim any affiliation with Morgan Stanley without the prior written permission of Morgan Stanley. 7

PDVSA’s selective default risks further oil outages

PDVSA’s selective default risks further oil outages

Petróleos de Venezuela’s (PDVSA’s) debt swap earlier this week provides Venezuela’s state oil company temporary relief from upcoming debt payments, but this act of “selective default” is unlikely to significantly alleviate the financial concerns for the company nor the government. Risk of oil production outage from Venezuela as a result of a potentially disruptive full blown default would drive the global oil market closer to balance and push oil prices higher. PDVSA’s selective default risks further oil outages. As we highlighted in February, the finances of the PDVSA and the Venezuelan government were precarious, with CDS spreads indicating that both are close to default. Since then, the economy has plunged further into economic chaos as electricity shortages (blamed on a lack of rain to power hydroelectricity) and hyperinflation running over 1000% have roiled the oil dependent country. That has been paired with political chaos. The opposition government is currently trying to call for a referendum to oust President Maduro (and they claim their efforts are being thwarted by the government’s “ongoing coup d’etat”). Beyond weak oil prices, oil production in Venezuela has been continuously falling, severely crimping PDVSA’s revenues. This week PDVSA managed to swap US$2.8bn of debt maturing in 2017 for US$3.4bn maturing in 2020. However, that only represents under 40% of the US$7.1bn maturing in April and November 2017, far short of the 50% target PDVSA had set. S&P Ratings have labelled the event a “selective default”. The short-term relief of pushing maturity out, comes with the cost of higher payments later. The strategy is clearly reliant on oil prices and production volume increasing. (click to enlarge) While Venezuela is likely to be exempt from cutting production as part of the OPEC quota target that was recently announced, we believe that the country will struggle to raise production. Foreign oil service providers will continue to pare back on their operations in the country in this chaotic and uncertain environment. When we first wrote about Venezuela’s financial woes in February, global oversupply of crude was assumed to be around 2.3 million barrels per day. At the time, we judged it unlikely that most of Venezuela’s 2.4 million barrels per day of production would be wiped out over-night. However, today the global over-supply is only around 0.3 million barrels. Venezuelan production has fallen 0.2 million barrels since the beginning of the year, highlighting much production can unravel in times of chaos. Therefore, we now believe that a serious production outage from Venezuela could push the global oil market toward balance and increase price.

Nitesh Shah, Research Analyst at ETF Securities

Nitesh is a Commodities Strategist at ETF Securities. Nitesh has 13 years of experience as an economist and strategist, covering a wide range of markets and asset classes. Prior to joining ETF Securities, Nitesh was an economist covering the European structured finance markets at Moody’s Investors Service and was a member of Moody’s global macroeconomics team. Before that he was an economist at the Pension Protection Fund and an equity strategist at Decision Economics. He started his career at HSBC Investment Bank. Nitesh holds a Bachelor of Science in Economics from the London School of Economics and a Master of Arts in International Economics and Finance from Brandeis University (USA).

Loonie set for near term tumble

Loonie set for near term tumble

Trade Idea – Foreign Exchange – Loonie set for near term tumble

Highlights

  • The tentative agreement reached by OPEC last Wednesday has sent oil prices to the top of their recent range and lent support to oil linked currencies.
  • In practice the production limit will be hard to implement and oil prices will likely retrace gains in coming months.
  • The CAD looks to continue its downtrend as extended positioning corrects lower and monetary conditions are eased.
  • OPEC surprises markets
Global crude benchmarks and oil linked currencies jumped last Wednesday on news that members of OPEC had tentatively agreed to implement a production target for the first time in seven years. Both commodity and currency markets responded positively to the surprise deal that was viewed broadly as an unlikely prospect due to long standing differences between key group members, Saudi Arabia and Iran. While the deal certainly marks a shift in stance of the oil exporting group, we do not believe it is enough to sustain support for the CAD which is at risk from a confluence of bearish factors, specifically underwhelming economic performance, stretched speculative positioning and technical resistance. We therefore see current levels as an attractive point to gain long exposure to the USD/CAD and EUR/CAD currency pairs which are set to benefit from near term oil weakness.

Symbolic but not practical

We believe the uplift in the oil market provided by the latest OPEC agreement will not last for long as the practicalities of the arrangement and wider concerns over slowing global oil demand growth keep oil prices contained. The deal itself, while an important move symbolically, did not provide a definite promise to remove a significant amount of output from the global oil market (removing anywhere from 200-700k barrels per day (bpd)) and requires the implementation of country level quotas. This is a large and politically sensitive task and is unlikely to be completed before the next OPEC meeting in November. In addition, the deal failed to provide clarity over conditions for countries under duress such as Venezuela, Nigeria and Libya where production is currently far below capacity, but has the potential to increase in the interim. Thus, support from oil prices is therefore likely to be absent for the CAD in the coming months. (Click to enlarge)

CAD underperforms NOK

While both the NOK and CAD are heavily linked to the oil price, prospects for the two currencies have recently diverged. Latest growth and inflation data from Norway has surpassed the expectations of its central bank, causing the Norges bank’s Executive Board to deliver a more hawkish policy message and raise its projected rate path. In contrast, lacklustre inflation, retail sales and manufacturing data has prompted a more dovish tone from the Bank of Canada (BoC), which makes it increasingly likely to ease monetary policy at its upcoming meetings. This has been reflected in the relative outperformance of the NOK in the past month, which has rallied by 2.8% relative to CAD on a trade weighted basis (see Figure 1).

Positioning stretched

The USD/CAD and EUR/CAD are on strong longer term upward trends (CAD weakening) which look well placed to continue. Net speculative positioning underpinning the CAD is hovering at record highs and looks increasingly subject to a correction. A fall in oil prices or further easing by the BoC could see CAD longs (which are at the strongest level in two years) fall sharply and shorts gather momentum, exacerbating any rise in USD/CAD and EUR/CAD. Investors wishing to express the investment views outlined above may consider using the following ETF Securities ETPs: Currency ETPs EUR Base ETFS Long CAD Short EUR (ECAD) ETFS Short CAD Long EUR (CADE) GBP Base ETFS Long CAD Short GBP (GBCA) ETFS Short CAD Long GBP (CAGB) USD Base ETFS Long CAD Short USD (LCAD) ETFS Short CAD Long USD (SCAD) 3x ETFS 3x Long CAD Short EUR (ECA3) ETFS 3x Short CAD Long EUR (CAE3) 5x ETFS 5x Long CAD Short EUR (ECA5) ETFS 5x Short CAD Long EUR (CAE5) Currency Baskets ETFS Bullish USD vs Commodity Currency Basket Securities (SCOM) ETFS Bearish USD vs Commodity Currency Basket Securities (LCOM)

Important Information

This communication has been provided by ETF Securities (UK) Limited (“ETFS UK”) which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”). The products discussed in this document are issued by ETFS Foreign Exchange Limited (“FXL”). FXL is regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission. This communication is only targeted at professional investors. In Switzerland, this communication is only targeted at Regulated Qualified Investors. The information contained in this communication is for your general information only and is neither an offer for sale nor a solicitation of an offer to buy securities. This communication should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance and any investments may go down in value. This document is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or any other step in furtherance of a public offering of shares or securities in the United States or any province or territory thereof. Neither this document nor any copy hereof should be taken, transmitted or distributed (directly or indirectly) into the United States. This communication may contain independent market commentary prepared by ETFS UK based on publicly available information. Although ETFS UK endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the content in this communication, ETFS UK does not warrant or guarantee its accuracy or correctness. Any third party data providers used to source the information in this communication make no warranties or representation of any kind relating to such data. Where ETFS UK has expressed its own opinions related to product or market activity, these views may change. Neither ETFS UK, nor any affiliate, nor any of their respective, officers, directors, partners, or employees accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication or its contents. ETFS UK is required by the FCA to clarify that it is not acting for you in any way in relation to the investment or investment activity to which this communication relates. In particular, ETFS UK will not provide any investment services to you and or advise you on the merits of, or make any recommendation to you in relation to, the terms of any transaction. No representative of ETFS UK is authorised to behave in any way which would lead you to believe otherwise. ETFS UK is not, therefore, responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients and you should seek your own independent legal, investment and tax or other advice as you see fit. Short and/or leveraged exchange-traded products are only intended for investors who understand the risks involved in investing in a product with short and/or leveraged exposure and who intend to invest on a short term basis. Potential losses from short and leveraged exchange-traded products may be magnified in comparison to products that provide an unleveraged exposure. Please refer to the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the relevant prospectus for further details of these and other risks. Securities issued by FXL are direct, limited recourse obligations of FXL alone and are not obligations of or guaranteed by any of Morgan Stanley & Co International plc, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, any of their affiliates or anyone else or any of their affiliates. Each of Morgan Stanley & Co International plc and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated disclaims all and any liability whether arising in tort, contract or otherwise (save as referred to above) which it might have in respect of this document or its contents otherwise arising in connection herewith. The Morgan Stanley Indices are the exclusive property of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (”Morgan Stanley”). Morgan Stanley and the Morgan Stanley index names are service mark(s) of Morgan Stanley or its affiliates and have been licensed for use for certain purposes by ETF Securities Limited in respect of the securities issued by FXL. The securities issued by FXL are not sponsored, endorsed, or promoted by Morgan Stanley, and Morgan Stanley bears no liability with respect to any such financial securities. The prospectus of FXL contains a more detailed description of the limited relationship Morgan Stanley has with FXL and any related financial securities. No purchaser, seller or holder of securities issued by FXL, or any other person or entity, should use or refer to any Morgan Stanley trade name, trademark or service mark to sponsor, endorse, market or promote this product without first contacting Morgan Stanley to determine whether Morgan Stanley’s permission is required. Under no circumstances may any person or entity claim any affiliation with Morgan Stanley without the prior written permission of Morgan Stanley.