Gold outlook 2019: recovery expected to continue

Gold outlook 2019: recovery expected to continue WisdomTreeGold staged a recovery late in 2018. The yellow metal has recovered most of its losses since June 2018. A collapse in speculative positioning in gold futures drove prices down in the second half of the year, sentiment toward gold is clearly recovering in recent weeks. We expect the recovery to continue as many risks that were being ignored by the market start to get priced-in to gold. Our base case scenario is for gold to reach close to US$1370/oz by year end.

Figure 1: Gold price forecast

Source: WisdomTree Model Forecasts, Bloomberg Historical Data, data available as of close 31 December 2018. Forecasts are not an indicator of future performance and any investments are subject to risks and uncertainties.

Approach

Using the framework we outlined in our paper Gold outlook: gold to flatline out to June 2019 in the absence of shocks, we apply our views on inflation, exchange rates, interest rates and investor sentiment to try to project where gold will be by the end of the year.

Speculative positioning drives recovery

In 2018 speculative positioning fell to the lowest level since 2001 briefly before recovering very late in the year. Judging by flows into gold Exchange Traded Products, sentiment toward the metal is clearly recovering. Asset market volatility in the final weeks of the year was one of the main catalysts behind the recovery in gold positioning. The S&P 500 lost 14% and Brent oil fell by 35% in the final quarter of 2018. Moreover, the volatility of both benchmarks has risen substantially.

A government shutdown in the US acted as a jolt to investors to remind them that the world’s engine of growth (at least in recent times) is not invincible. Meanwhile concerns around China’s slowing growth rate also led investors to become less optimistic about cyclical assets.

Fed to continue to tighten policy

We expect the Federal Reserve (Fed) to raise rates twice in 2019 (50 basis points), in line with the dot-plots in the central bank’s recent economic forecasts . That’s also in line with consensus forecasts by economists, however, Fed fund futures are not pricing in any rate increases for 2019. We side with the Fed’s guidance as we believe that economic data from the country is strong enough and labour markets are tight enough for the central bank to continue to raise rates. However, we acknowledge the risk to rates is on the downside – which in general should play to the upside for gold prices.

US Treasury bond yield curve to invert

Although we expect a total of 50 basis points increase in policy rates by Q4 2019, we think that 10-year bond yields will only increase around 25 basis points to 3.0% in that time horizon. 2-year bond yields are likely to capture more of the gains in policy rates, but further out in the curve, we are likely to see less yield increases. That’s because the Fed’s holding of a large stock of bonds is likely to hold yields back from rising too aggressively. Also, recent tax cuts are likely to have the most impact in the very short term.

As the growth impact peters out over longer horizons, the uplift to yields at the longer end of the curve will be less than at the short end. Although many people see yield curve inversion as a financial signal of impending economic downturn, we believe that an inversion can occur for the less benign reasons outlined above and so it is not necessarily a precursor to an economic recession. If anything, we believe the Fed will err on the side of dovishness, as it will be reluctant to drive policy too far from other central banks. In fact, Fed fund futures indicate that the market thinks that the Fed will stop raising rates altogether this year. That could prove to be supportive for gold prices over the course of 2019.

Figure 2: Nominal US 10 year Bond Yields forecast

Source: WisdomTree Model Forecasts, Bloomberg Historical Data, data available as of close 31 December 2018. Forecasts are not an

indicator of future performance and any investments are subject to risks and uncertainties.

US Dollar appreciation to be short-lived

While the Fed remains the only major central bank raising interest rates over in the first half of the year, we expect the US Dollar to continue to appreciate, especially as judging by Fed fund futures, the market is currently not expecting further tightening. However, as other major central banks – the European Central Bank, Bank of Japan, Bank of England for example start to think about policy normalisation, we could see interest rate differentials narrow and the US Dollar weaken. Additionally, with growing indebtedness in the US – exacerbated by recent tax cuts – we expect a depreciation in the US Dollar.

Figure 3: US Dollar Exchange Rate Forecast

Source: WisdomTree Model Forecasts, Bloomberg Historical Data, data available as of close 31 December 2018. Forecasts are not an indicator of future performance and any investments are subject to risks and uncertainties.

Inflationary pressures to persist, but remain contained by Fed’s policy

US consumer price index (CPI) inflation peaked at 2.9% in July 2018 and declined to 2.2% in November 2018. Volatile energy prices were responsible for a large part of the rise and decline. We expect the Fed’s policy tightening to continue to keep demand-driven inflation in check, but a recovery in oil prices will likely place upward pressure on inflation at the headline level. We expect a small increase in inflation to 2.3% by year-end.

Figure 4: Consumer Price Index inflation forecast

Source: WisdomTree Model Forecasts, Bloomberg Historical Data, data available as of close 31 December 2018. Forecasts are not an indicator of future performance and any investments are subject to risks and uncertainties.

What will help sentiment toward gold improve?

Summarising the monetary/economic drivers of gold – small increases in interest rates, minor appreciation followed by depreciation of the US Dollar and inflation moving marginally higher – are not going to move the dial for gold in a big way. We believe that that gold prices will end the forecast period higher mainly as a result of sentiment towards gold continuing to move out of a depressed state. This process had started already in the final week of 2018 as most markets displayed excessive volatility.

We have had multiple bouts of equity market volatility in 2018, but for most part developed world equities have snapped back. That does not guarantee resilience in the face of the next shock. We note that the last time speculative positioning in gold hit levels as low as they did in 2018 was in 2001 – the year when an Argentine debt crisis was brewing, and an overvalued technology sector was imploding. Gold reacted to the stress scenario but with latency. Gold prices rose 25% in 2002 (compared to 2% in 2001) .

There are other risks, that could be supportive for gold as historically a safe haven asset, which could drive positioning in gold futures higher:

No deal Brexit– The UK’s prime minister appears to have insufficient support for the terms of withdrawal from the EU that she has been responsible for negotiating. Although she survived a vote of no confidence from her own party, it clear that the proposal is detested by leave and remain MPs alike. Renegotiating the terms of withdrawal appear impossible at this stage and so it is difficult to see how either side will be appeased by the current deal.

We believe the most likely outcome will be for some form of extension beyond the March 30th deadline, however, there is a risk that doesn’t happen and there would be` no withdrawal deal in place. Leaving the EU in such an uncertain manner is likely to be very disruptive for both the UK and EU. Even if there is an extension to the deadline, uncertainty will linger, which will support demand for haven assets.

Trade-wars – Our working assumption is that rising protectionism in the US is not going to damage global economic demand. In fact, there are signs that the rift between the US and China is beginning to thaw. However, we have seen similar signs before which have been followed by a deterioration of the relationship. If tit-for-tat protectionist measures escalate, the market could be driven into a risk-off mindset.

The US government is currently shut down as President Trump vies congress to fund his border wall with Mexico. The risk of the standoff becoming prolonged could support demand for haven assets. Indeed, even if the government reopens soon, the risk of the Trump administration continuously using the threat of shutdowns as a strategy to gain leverage over congress is likely to hurt investor confidence in cyclical assets.

In our forecast, we bring back speculative positioning in gold futures to levels consistent with what we have seen in the past five years.

Figure 5: Gold futures speculative positioning

Source: WisdomTree Model Forecasts, Bloomberg Historical Data, data available as of close 31 December 2018. Forecasts are not an indicator of future performance and any investments are subject to risks and uncertainties.

Combining the monetary, economic and sentiment driven factors affecting gold, we believe gold will reach close to US$1370/oz by the end of this year.

Alternative scenarios

We have also developed alternative scenarios for gold as summarised below. Most of the sensitivity comes from our measure of sentiment, speculative positioning. But even in our bear case, we increase positioning into positive territory. In our bull case scenario, we assume the Fed will allow the economy to run hot, only raising rates once, which will put less pressure on bond yields to rise, aid US Dollar depreciation and keep inflation elevated at 2.9%. In the bear case, conversely, we assume the Fed acts more hawkishly and has more impact on the longer bond yields. The US Dollar appreciates as the Fed surprises the market with its hawkishness.

Source: WisdomTree Model Forecasts, Bloomberg Historical Data, data available as of close 31 December 2018. Forecasts are not an indicator of future performance and any investments are subject to risks and uncertainties.

Conclusion

In our base case scenario, we expect gold prices to rise close to US$1370/oz by Q4 2019, mainly as a result of speculative positioning in the futures market being restored. Some US Dollar depreciation and small gains in inflation will also aid gold’s rise.

DISCLAIMER

The content on this document is issued by WisdomTree UK Ltd (“WTUK”), which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”). Our Conflicts of Interest Policy and Inventory are available on request.

 

 

 

In charge with Electric Vehicles

Electric Vehicles (EVs) tap into key megatrends

The world is changing at a rapid pace. Over the next decade, we expect five key megatrends to shape the framework in which we live. The marriage of two of these key megatrends – (1) technological innovation and (2) climate change builds the case for EV adoption. The reason for this is, the rise of EVs plugs the problem of rising global carbon emissions along with reaping the benefits of the rapid technological advancement.

Sources: Mc Kinsey July 2016, United Nations (UN) June 2017, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) May 2018, US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) May 2014 and WisdomTree

Impact of Policy Change

Political will has been the cornerstone of the shift to electrification. More than nine countries and a dozen cities or states have announced bans on the internal combustion engine within the next decade or so. Governments across the globe are supporting the shift to electrification in the auto industry by providing the necessary infrastructure and tax incentives. In doing so, they are signalling the urgency to move to zero emission vehicles to meet their climate and air quality goals. Recent investment announcements for EV infrastructure development in selected countries (Billions USD) are highlighted below:

Source: International Energy Agency, WisdomTree, data available as of close 28 June 2018

China is going green

China is spearheading its way in the EV market and accounted for nearly three quarters of global EV sales in 2017. China is yet to set a deadline for automakers to end sales of gas and diesel engines. However, the government has set very specific and trackable targets on environmental development in its 13th five-year plan. China is positioning itself to be a leader of New Energy Vehicles (NEVs) in terms of both shipment volume and technology.

After four decades of growth China’s environmental quality is now significantly poor. The government is intent on raising environmental standards. In 2015, a central government led crackdown on pollution was first introduced in the 13th five-year plan. Thousands of industrial plant owners were fined and charged for misconduct. Despite the marginal improvement in air quality it is still far from reaching the healthy standards set by international organisations. Most of China’s pollution is a result of heavy coal use which accounted for 60.4% of its total energy consumption in 2017. We are now likely to see an increase in consumption of natural gas and non-fossil fuel sources owing to the governments binding targets on energy and carbon intensity.

China has become the world’s largest auto market since 2009. Road networks contribute to 76.8% of its freight traffic and is the largest source of air pollution, underpinning the significance of the shift to New Energy Vehicles (NEVs) in China. Both the consumer and manufacturers are benefiting from government subsidies on New Energy Vehicles. In August 2017 the government issued its “Beijing -Tianjin-Hebei Autumn and Winter Air pollution control plan 2017-18”. The state council further announced a 3-year action plan for Winning the Blue Sky Defence War, with detailed targets and measures in June 2018. The Chinese government aims to sell 2mn NEV in 2020 & 7mn NEVs by 2025.

Hurdles in the EV industry

The cumulative number of plug-in electric vehicles sold worldwide, for the first nine months of this year, stands at 1,279,000 (up 68% year-over-year) marking 1.8% market share. Pure Battery Electric Vehicles (BEV) led the pack up 61% and Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEV) rose 36% over the prior year. Projections on the EV market remain optimistic. The International Energy Agency (IEA) expects EVs to become mass market in the next 10- 15 years. The following three hurdles appear to be holding back mass EV adoption.

Source: WisdomTree

Higher battery costs are one of the main obstacles holding back consumers from buying EVs. Innovation in battery technology have enabled battery costs to decline from US$1000 per kWh (Kilo watt hour) in 2010 to below US$250 per kWh, according to S&P Global Platts. Battery prices are expected to decline further by US$100 by 2030, at which point EVs are likely to be competitive with Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles.

Advancement in battery technology

Lithium-ion batteries (LiBs) are the most widely used batteries in EVs owing to their high energy density. Metals account for 40% of the costs of LiBs according to consultant firm Roskill. These batteries require more than just lithium, with other metals used in the electrodes (anode and cathode) including graphite, cobalt, nickel and manganese. LiBs adopt a range of battery chemistries that employ various combinations of anode and cathode materials. The five most advanced technologies used in LiB are: Lithium Manganese Oxide (LMO), Lithium Cobalt Oxide (LCO), Nickel Cobalt Aluminium (NCA), Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) and Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP).

Source: Boston Consulting Group (BCG), January 2010

Each of the above Lithium ion technologies can be compared along six dimensions: safety, lifespan (measured in terms of both number of charge and discharge cycles and overall battery age); performance; specific energy (how much energy a battery can store per kilogram of weight); specific power (how much power the battery can store per kilogram of mass) and finally cost. Safety is by far the most important criterion for LiB. Meanwhile battery producers face a constant tug of war between cost and safety as no single technology delivers on all six dimensions.

Source: WisdomTree

While the NCA boasts of high performance it poses safety challenges, the LFP ranks high on safety it has lower specific energy. While battery technology has taken great strides, there is no single technology that ranks highly on all six dimensions. Battery technology remains in a constant struggle to find the right chemistry to achieve the optimum performance across all six dimensions.d acceptance among manufactures. Battery manufacturers are experimenting with the composition ratios of these metals and are favouring a higher proportion of nickel. Implementing a higher proportion of nickel provides the benefit of higher energy in the batteries over long distances and also make the batteries lighter. However, the lifetime of these batteries is short. Added to that, higher nickel ratios reduce battery manufacturers dependence on cobalt. Most of the world’s supply of cobalt arises from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Owing to the country’s political instability combined with human rights spotlight on child labour, a large portion of the world’s supply of cobalt remains at risk. According to Roskill and Benchmark Mineral Intelligence (BMI), NMC batteries featuring higher nickel proportions of 5:2:3 and 6:2:2 are already in use and manufactures are pushing to commercialise the NMC 8:1:1. However the NMC’s 8:1:1 highly stringent requirement in terms of dust, moisture and contamination control are holding back efforts to make the battery commercial. NMC 8:1:1 is expected to gain significant market share in the EV market by 2020.

We expect the rapid pace of innovation in battery technology to speed up mass adoption of EVs. As adoption of EVs garner momentum they will have far reaching implications for commodities. We expect metals such as – nickel, copper, silver and smaller elements such as – cobalt and lithium to benefit from the uptake of EVs, which we will discuss in detail in the second part of our blog.

This material is prepared by WisdomTree and its affiliates and is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of the date of production and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by WisdomTree, nor any affiliate, nor any of their officers, employees or agents. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

Precious metals favoured in a week of volatility

Precious metals favoured in a week of volatility

ETF Securities – Precious metals favoured in a week of volatility

Highlights

  • Gold and silver inflows dominated in a week of political volatility.
  • Profit-taking follows rise in oil price.
  • Investors appeared to sell diversified commodity baskets as volatility intensified.

Download the complete report (.pdf)

A rally in gold and silver prices piqued investor interest in precious metal ETPs. A 2.8% rise in gold prices and a 0.3% rally in silver prices last week aided inflows into precious metal ETPs. Silver saw a second consecutive week of inflows of US$8.3mn. Gold inflows of US$22.5mn reversed most of the prior week’s outflows. Gold prices started rallying mid-week when the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC) released it latest policy statement and projections. The market interpreted the Fed’s position as dovish, as the median forecast for end of year rates had not changed.

The US Dollar basket declined by 0.65% on the day of the release of the statement, providing a tailwind for precious metal prices. Although we think the market generally missed the fact the dispersion of dots in the ‘dot plot’ (the map of the FOMC participant’s views on where policy rates will end the year), shifted significantly from December 2017, with an equal number of participants now expecting four rate hikes in total this year as those expecting three. It will likely only take a small nudge to get more Fed participants to expect higher rates. Gold rallied harder towards the end of the week as its haven quality came into focus due to fears of a trade war intensifying. On Thursday, the Trump Administration announced it will imposing tariffs on Chinese imports. Details are vague, but the Administration is expected to offer further information in the next 15 days. Up to US$60bn in annual imports from China are targeted with a 25% tariff.

The Chinese response so far has been limited, with the Ministry of Commerce only announcing a reciprocal tariff on 128 US products accounting for US$3bn in imports. However, that does not preclude further action. The market fears that this could escalate into a full blown trade war. Also on Thursday, former United Nations ambassador John Bolton joined the Trump Administration, replacing H.R. McMaster as national security adviser. He is seen a policy hawk, who will take a tough stance on Iran and North Korea. Bolton believes that the current Iranian nuclear deal is irreconcilable. Having such a hawk as an advisor to the President appears to have raised the geopolitical premium in gold price.

Political volatility drove US$65mn out of diversified commodity baskets as investors considered de-risking and taking profit on earlier gains. That outflow reversed all of the inflows from the prior two weeks and was the largest outflow since June 2017. However, some investors saw last week’s price capitulation in cyclicals assets as a buying opportunity. For example there were US$10.6mn inflows into copper ETPs as the price of copper fell 3.7%. That was the highest inflow in seven weeks.

Oil prices rallied 5.5%, driving profit-taking from crude oil ETPs. An unexpected draw on inventory ignited oil prices mid-week, and then the instalment of an Iran-hawk into the Trump Administration sent prices substantially higher as a geopolitical premium entered the oil price. ETP investors continued to take profit, with US$90.4mn of withdrawals. That marked the highest outflow since November 2017. At the same time there were US$5.2mn of inflows into short crude oil ETPs, the highest since December 2017.

Important Information

General

This communication has been issued and approved for the purpose of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 by ETF Securities (UK) Limited (“ETFS UK”) which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”).
The information contained in this communication is for your general information only and is neither an offer for sale nor a solicitation of an offer to buy securities. This communication should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance and any investments may go down in value.

This document is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or any other step in furtherance of a public offering of shares or securities in the United States or any province or territory thereof. Neither this document nor any copy hereof should be taken, transmitted or distributed (directly or indirectly) into the United States.

This communication may contain independent market commentary prepared by ETFS UK based on publicly available information

This communication may contain independent market commentary prepared by ETFS UK based on publicly available information. Although ETFS UK endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the content in this communication, ETFS UK does not warrant or guarantee its accuracy or correctness. Any third party data providers used to source the information in this communication make no warranties or representation of any kind relating to such data. Where ETFS UK has expressed its own opinions related to product or market activity, these views may change. Neither ETFS UK, nor any affiliate, nor any of their respective officers, directors, partners, or employees accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication or its contents.

ETFS UK is required by the FCA to clarify that it is not acting for you in any way in relation to the investment or investment activity to which this communication relates. In particular, ETFS UK will not provide any investment services to you and or advise you on the merits of, or make any recommendation to you in relation to, the terms of any transaction. No representative of ETFS UK is authorised to behave in any way which would lead you to believe otherwise. ETFS UK is not, therefore, responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients and you should seek your own independent legal, investment and tax or other advice as you see fit.

 

Commodities buck cyclical shakedown

Commodities buck cyclical shakedown

Commodity Monthly Monitor – Commodities buck cyclical shakedown

Your reference guide to commodity markets. Includes the latest outlook for each commodity sector and major developments for individual commodities.

Summary

  • After capitulating in 2017, agricultural prices are picking up momentum in 2018.
  • Industrial metals continue to outperform based on strong fundamentals.
  • The energy complex was a drag on commodity performance last month.
  • Silver prices to play catch up as fundamentals improve.

Read the complete report

Summary

While the S&P500, cryptocurrencies and bond prices fell last month, commodities posted gains. The S&P500 volatility index is now back to its normal territory after a protracted period of being subdued. Cyclical commodities like industrial metals however, continue to trade higher on firm fundamentals. Gains were not homogenous in commodities: the unsustainable rise in oil prices in January faltered in February and palladium has begun to unwind, coming closer to parity with platinum after consistently trading above since October 2017.As China re-opens after the New Year celebrations, better quality data from the largest consumer of commodities will come due.

Year-on-year comparisons of data from China in the months of January and February are very difficult because the timing of lunar New Year is not the same each year on the Georgian calendar. However, the Caixin China manufacturing purchasing managers index indicates that manufacturing output hit a 13-month high in January, setting a strong scene for industrial metals.The commodity complex was aided by a softer US Dollar. However, Federal Open Market Committee minutes (released after the cut-off of data in this report), indicate the US central bank is ready to raise rates faster than the market had previously assumed. That could lead to US Dollar appreciation if other central banks fail to reflect a similarly strong policy message

Rock bottom?

After capitulating in 2017, agricultural prices are picking up momentum in 2018. Prices have fallen so low that any hint of ‘good news’ appears to spark a rally.Industrial metals continue to outperform based on strong fundamentals. Despite the onslaught of the global equity market correction, industrial metals recouped their initial losses as fundamentals prevailed. Ongoing supply deficits for most metals coupled with strong demand bode well for the sector.

Commodity performance last month

The energy complex was a drag on commodity performance last month. A return to more normal weather in the US dampened natural gas prices while oil gave back unsustainable gains from January. The only area of the energy complex to post an increase was the price of carbon as environmental regulation is expected to address a glut in permits. Silver prices to play catch up as fundamentals improve.

The gold to silver ratio is currently at 81 (as on 16 February 2018), its highest level since April 2016. We expect silver prices to catch up owing to the continued strength in the industrial cycle and a constrained mine supply. Although the fundamentals remain strong : ongoing supply deficits and buoyant auto sales in China, we would not rule out further price correction from current levels given the sharp run up in prices in 2017.

For more information contact:

Catarina Donat Marques
ETF Securities (UK) Limited
T +44 20 7448 4386
E catarina.donatmarques@etfsecurities.com

Important Information

The analyses in the above tables are purely for information purposes. They do not reflect the performance of any ETF Securities’ products . The futures and roll returns are not necessarily investable.

General

This communication has been provided by ETF Securities (UK) Limited (“ETFS UK”) which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”).

This communication is only targeted at qualified or professional investors.

The information contained in this communication is for your general information only and is neither an offer for sale nor a solicitation of an offer to buy securities. This communication should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance and any investments may go down in value.

This document is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or any other step in furtherance of a public offering of shares or securities in the United States or any province or territory thereof. Neither this document nor any copy hereof should be taken, transmitted or distributed (directly or indirectly) into the United States.

This communication may contain independent market commentary prepared by ETFS UK based on publicly available information

This communication may contain independent market commentary prepared by ETFS UK based on publicly available information. Although ETFS UK endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the content in this communication, ETFS UK does not warrant or guarantee its accuracy or correctness. Any third party data providers used to source the information in this communication make no warranties or representation of any kind relating to such data. Where ETFS UK has expressed its own opinions related to product or market activity, these views may change. Neither ETFS UK, nor any affiliate, nor any of their respective, officers, directors, partners, or employees accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication or its contents.

ETFS UK is required by the FCA to clarify that it is not acting for you in any way in relation to the investment or investment activity to which this communication relates. In particular, ETFS UK will not provide any investment services to you and or advise you on the merits of, or make any recommendation to you in relation to, the terms of any transaction. No representative of ETFS UK is authorised to behave in any way which would lead you to believe otherwise. ETFS UK is not, therefore, responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients and you should seek your own independent legal, investment and tax or other advice as you see fit.

 

Strongman emerges out of China

Strongman emerges out of China

The two-term limit on China’s president has been abolished. That paves the way for Xi Jinping, the sitting president and General Secretary of the Communist Party of China to become a strongman. While not so good for the country’s institutional framework, “more of the same” could bode well for commodity demand in the short to medium term.

As we wrote about in China Congress: The making of a strongman, Xi Jinping has been using the past few years to purge his competition. Partly under the ruse of a war on corruption he has been frequently replacing officials with his cronies. We predicted that he will try to bend the rules to extend his power beyond his two terms. However, we expected a more subtle placement of one his protégés in the Politburo Standing Committee (the top 7 politicians in the Communist Party), so that in 2022 when his term completes he could rule from behind the scenes. Instead, he has taken the more brazen step of abolishing the two-term rule altogether, so that his indefinite presidency could go unchallenged.

Weakens the institutional framework in China

We believe that this significantly weakens the institutional framework in China and presents a hurdle for reform. As we stated in China Congress: The making of a strongman, maintaining the status quo could place too much emphasis on cyclical economic growth, neglecting the structural reform the country needs. Arbitrary growth targets have led to debt levels in the country rising, making the country vulnerable to a shock.

On the flip side, “more of the same” could mean that weaning itself off construction and infrastructure-led growth will be slow, painting a bolder demand picture for commodities. So the short to medium term outlook for commodities may improve. Sustainable growth and a larger role for the market economy – some of tenets of the much-vaunted Third Plenum of the 18th CPC Central Committee in 2013 – may once again be postponed.

For now, the strength in demand for metals – notwithstanding the temporary disruption due to winter curtailments of manufacturing to improve environmental outcomes – is likely to continue. Meanwhile supply of many metals is likely to remain constrained following several years of subdued capital investment in mines. We expect base metals such as copper, nickel, zinc and lead to remain in a supply deficit in 2018.

Nitesh Shah, Research Analyst at ETF Securities

Nitesh is a Commodities Strategist at ETF Securities. Nitesh has 13 years of experience as an economist and strategist, covering a wide range of markets and asset classes. Prior to joining ETF Securities, Nitesh was an economist covering the European structured finance markets at Moody’s Investors Service and was a member of Moody’s global macroeconomics team. Before that he was an economist at the Pension Protection Fund and an equity strategist at Decision Economics. He started his career at HSBC Investment Bank. Nitesh holds a Bachelor of Science in Economics from the London School of Economics and a Master of Arts in International Economics and Finance from Brandeis University (USA).