4 defensively-oriented strategies to consider in 2019

Global markets, led largely by US equities, have been treated to a fairly robust period since the Global Financial Crisis of 2008-09. As 2019 begins, investors are beginning to think about what might happen if that next recession actually materializes, as the US has undergone what is now close to the longest ever economic expansion in the post World War Two period. Importantly, measures of volatility indicate a higher overall level of risk, relative to either the start of 2017 or the start of 2018.

In such environments, we believe that investors might be thinking about positioning their investment strategies in a more defensively-oriented manner. There still could be good reason to hold risky assets, as late cycle rallies can and do occur, but it may now be more important to mitigate downside risk.

We’d cite the age-old investment truism—if a portfolio loses 50% of its value, what is the rate of return required to get back to even? While many might initially say “50%”, the true answer is 100%. Strategies that lead to the potential for less negative returns in tougher markets can therefore be quite valuable.

At WisdomTree, we can think of four primary means to mitigate the risk that a given strategy drops significantly in a given downturn. Unfortunately, they don’t always work to the same degree and they aren’t guaranteed to work across every market downdraft, but they are important to keep in mind nonetheless.

Strategy 1: Find historically low valuations.

When investors locate valuations that are at or near historic lows, this can be an important signal that a lot of risks that may be dominating the headlines have been priced in. Another way to think of this is that all the reasons to worry have already caused the market in question to decline, so absent even more, new and surprising reasons to worry, it could be tough for that market to decline further. There is word commonly associated with this type of strategy: Contrarian.

Possible markets to consider on this basis: Emerging markets, Italian equities—particularly Italian financial sector, and Japanese equities.

Strategy 2: Find high dividend yielding stocks

One aspect of this strategy considers that, in equities, there is always a dividend component and a price component of a given total return calculation. The dividend component, at worst, can be zero, in that there are no dividends, whereas the price component can clearly be positive, zero, or negative. A strategy focused on higher yielding stocks is tilting more of the total return’s generation towards dividends and way from prices, and, since the dividend component of the return is less volatile, this is one way to lower the risk of an equity strategy.

The other aspect to consider regards the fact that higher yielding stocks tend to be found in more defensively oriented sectors, such as utilities. Tilting exposure toward these sectors can be another potential avenue through which the total risk of an equity strategy can be lowered.

Possible markets to consider on this basis: Emerging markets equities, European equities, and US equities.

Strategy 3: Sell assets that have positive price correlation to volatility

Using history as our guide, when equity markets enter severely negative trends, it has been typical to see measures like the Cboe Volatility Index (VIX) spike in the upward direction. The VIX has an important signalling capability, in that it indicates the forward-looking expectations of future volatility for the S&P 500. If the VIX is higher, it means that forward-looking expectations of volatility are expected to be higher. Certain assets like put options that have the S&P 500 as their underlying index would tend to see their prices rise in accordance with the rising VIX levels.

There is a well-known strategy where one can sell put options on the S&P 500, thereby collecting the premiums. The case for any put-writing strategy is of course directly tied to the underlying index upon which the options themselves are being written. If the premiums can tend to rise along with a rising VIX, what this indicates is a potential for the cushioning of downside risk during tougher market environments.

In the US, equities had reached record highs in early October of 2018 and valuations were quite high relative to other global markets. Record high prices and high relative valuations do tend to give investors more cause for concern to worry about downside risk, and this concern in our view is a critical catalyst for considering a put writing strategy.

Possible markets to consider on this basis: US equities.

Strategy 4: Don’t forget about traditional “safe haven” assets

Each of the first three strategies takes an approach to lower the risk of a given exposure either to equities directly or to something with high correlation to equities. We recognize that as volatility picks up, holding equities may become a less desirable approach whether or not is using some form of risk mitigation within the approach.

If volatility is increasing due to the perception of increased geopolitical risk, gold may be worth considering. Historically, when investors have been concerned about unexpected events or surprised by the direction politics takes in a major country, gold has been associated with delivering a differentiated return stream as compared to equities.

Another avenue might regard certain currencies, such as the US Dollar or Japanese Yen. These currencies have indicated a capability to increase in value as volatility has increased.

Possible markets to consider on this basis: Gold, US Dollar, Japanese Yen

Due to recent events, we have focused here on more defensively-oriented angles here. If investors are uncertain in their 2019 positioning, these approaches may lower their overall portfolios risk. For more information, visit WisdomTree.com.

DISCLAIMER

The content on this document is issued by WisdomTree UK Ltd (“WTUK”), which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”). Our Conflicts of Interest Policy and Inventory are available on request.

VIX and Tax promises lulling equity investors into a false sense of security

VIX and Tax promises lulling equity investors into a false sense of security

Equity Research – VIX and Tax promises lulling equity investors into a false sense of security

Summary

US equities have started the year in an amazingly tranquil way. Under such calm, the Dow and S&P500 have reached record levels. Consensus is optimistic, expecting corporate earnings growth of 21% this year, while the VIX is exceptionally low.

However, other indicators do not share such a placid view of the world. For example, government bond yields have remained low, indicating that risk appetite has not normalised.

We believe the VIX and corporate tax cut promises are lulling some investors into a false sense of security. Leaving equity markets vulnerable to a sell-off in the event of further interest rate rises and disappointment from the US political administration.

The VIX is exceptionally low

The VIX, a perceived measure of market risk highlights that there is little fear in the market at present. This year it has averaged 11.2, well below its long-term average of 19.6, putting this in context, only 4% of the time is it ever this low. On the one hand, good corporate earnings, the prospect for corporate tax cuts and expected infrastructure spending could justify such optimism, but on the other hand, we find it puzzling that political volatility in both the US and Europe is not being reflected in the VIX.

The unwinding of loose monetary policy and the potential unravelling of asset bubbles that this loose policy has created has driven up the demand for precious metals such as gold and certain other alternative investments higher. However, the VIX fails to mirror this rise in fear. This has led us to question whether the VIX is still a valid expression of market risk.

The VIX is understating risk

In an attempt to answer this question we have created a model of the VIX, using the Global Financial Stress Index (GFSI) in combination with the US Economic Policy Uncertainty Index. The former was developed by Bank of America Merrill Lynch, and measures a broad set of risk measures, hedging demand and investor appetite for risk. The latter is measure news story counts related to economic policy, uncertainty and legislation. The model, calibrated with data from 2001 until 2014, very closely tracked the VIX (with an r-squared measure of 0.9). However, recently there has been a widening deviation between model results and actual values. We believe this implies that the VIX is abnormally low. Our model suggests the VIX should be at 20, a level that is usually associated with much higher market risk.

(click to enlarge)

The term structure of the VIX, a reflection of investors future perception of volatility, is rising, suggesting investors are concerned for higher future volatility. At 9 months out volatility is expected to rise to 18, but it remains well below our model estimate of 20.

The steep term structure of the VIX is likely a result of years of loose monetary policy, the steep term structure gives yield hungry investors who are short the VIX a yield (carry trade). It is also a reflection of investors’ fears for the future, but this term steep term structure has been present for many years despite the VIX reaching new lows. In some ways, the carry trade and fears for the future are feeding off each other.

Financialisation of VIX futures

Some have suggested that the VIX is low due to:

  • Unstable macro events, a broad rise in the S&P500 is masking unusually low correlation between market sectors and individual stocks. Though this does not fully explain why the VIX has been deviating from our model, as this is a recent phenomenon.
  • CFTC futures on the VIX highlight much higher net positioning volatility; this has persisted since Ben Bernanke’s speech discussing tapering of quantitative easing in May 2013. It suggests increasingly divergent views on volatility.
  • An increase in demand for financial products that promise protection from rises in the VIX and market volatility. We have seen a large rise in shares outstanding for long VIX ETFs, while short VIX ETFs shares outstanding have fallen commensurately.

(click to enlarge)

  • Conversely, low interest rates and the consequent hunt for yield from investors has led to some investors to short the VIX, to take advantage positive yield generated from the persistently steep term structure.
  • We believe the VIX is artificially low because of CFTC positioning, while being volatile, it shows investors are close to the largest net short position in history.

What concerns us is that CFTC net positioning on the VIX is at record low levels suggesting many investors are taking advantage of this carry trade. The low VIX has created a perception of low risk in the markets, pulling down realised volatility on the S&P 500. Perversely, low equity volatility could be a factor driving the Fed to raise interest rates in March, but higher rates could prompt a disorderly unwind of this short positioning given that it is so extended at present.

Market pricing is looking stretched

This comes at a time when equity markets are making new all-time-highs and investor sentiment has reached peak bullishness according to the American Association of Individual Investors survey. Corporate earnings have been good, with 75% of delivered results beating expectations while growth in both earnings and sales continue to recover. Although valuations on the S&P500 are now becoming stretched, with trailing Price/Earnings multiples now at 22x, the highest point since 2002 and consensus earnings growth for 2017 is 21%, well above the average annual growth of 4.7%.

Tax reform disappointment

We question if it is right for investors to be so optimistic when valuations are so high. It seems that some of the large rise earnings growth is due to the base effect caused by the expected recovery in earnings in the oil sector. However, the main reason for such optimism is the prospect of corporate tax cuts, coupled with a tax amnesty on repatriating corporate cash piles. These could lead to an increase in share buybacks, boosting earnings. We believe it is likely that these promised tax reforms could be delayed given the need to be approved by Congress and the divisions in the Republican Party. Furthermore, without the revenue from a border tax, it’s difficult to see approval in Congress without a new source of revenue.

Profit margin squeeze to continue

Profit margins have peaked and have been trending downwards in recent years. We expect this trend to continue despite the renewed optimism for economic growth, primarily due to rising labour competition. The National Federation of Independent Business has reported a continued rise in unfilled job openings highlighting the increased difficulty employers face in finding skilled labour. That has pushed up wages, which account for roughly 70% of the average company’s costs.

(click to enlarge)

In short, we believe equity markets are becoming too complacent, valuations are high at a time when margins are likely to be squeezed further, whilst many promised tax cuts may not come to fruition this year. Furthermore, we believe the VIX is lulling some investors into a false sense of security when holding equities. These factors leave equity markets vulnerable to a sell-off in the event of further interest rate rises and continued lack of clarity from the US political administration.

Important Information

General

This communication has been issued and approved for the purpose of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 by ETF Securities (UK) Limited (“ETFS UK”) which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”). The information contained in this communication is for your general information only and is neither an offer for sale nor a solicitation of an offer to buy securities.

This communication should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance and any investments may go down in value.

This document is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or any other step in furtherance of a public offering of shares or securities in the United States or any province or territory thereof. Neither this document nor any copy hereof should be taken, transmitted or distributed (directly or indirectly) into the United States. This communication may contain independent market commentary prepared by ETFS UK based on publicly available information. Although ETFS UK endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the content in this communication, ETFS UK does not warrant or guarantee its accuracy or correctness. Any third party data providers used to source the information in this communication make no warranties or representation of any kind relating to such data. Where ETFS UK has expressed its own opinions related to product or market activity, these views may change. Neither ETFS UK, nor any affiliate, nor any of their respective officers, directors, partners, or employees accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication or its contents. ETFS UK is required by the FCA to clarify that it is not acting for you in any way in relation to the investment or investment activity to which this communication relates. In particular, ETFS UK will not provide any investment services to you and or advise you on the merits of, or make any recommendation to you in relation to, the terms of any transaction. No representative of ETFS UK is authorised to behave in any way which would lead you to believe otherwise. ETFS UK is not, therefore, responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients and you should seek your own independent legal, investment and tax or other advice as you see fit.