Bitcoin mining infrastructure doubled in Q4 2017

Bitcoin mining infrastructure doubled in Q4 2017 ETFBitcoin mining infrastructure doubled in Q4 2017

In the last quarter of 2017, many miners’ margins expanded due to the 226% rise in Bitcoin prices, making further investment into mining infrastructure more profitable. Consequently, there was a 111% increase in mining hash power. Bitcoin mining infrastructure doubled in Q4 2017.

Miners managed to double their mining infrastructure power in one quarter, which was well above the average hash power increase of 40% per quarter over the last 3 years. Although it is worth noting during the previous bubble in Bitcoin in 2013 similar rises in hash power occurred.

The increase in mining power has important ramifications for the marginal cost of mining bitcoin, because all it requires significant expenditure to purchase new mining rigs, arrange more warehouse space and negotiate electricity contracts.

In previous publications, we spent considerable time in understanding the marginal cost of Bitcoin. There are varied ways to value Bitcoin, but given it has some similarities to commodities we felt it would be worthwhile calculating the marginal cost of production.

While marginal cost varies for commodities as supply and demand changes, it is an effective way in understanding the long-term equilibrium price. Bitcoin is exceptional in that the supply is predictable, being determined by the structure of its underlying algorithm. The hash rate growth of the Bitcoin network, a measure of the speed at which Bitcoin blocks are mined, coupled with the known power consumption can be used to estimate the electricity consumption costs, the equivalent of the marginal cost of production that is often used to value commodities.

Using global power costs

Using global power costs we estimate the electricity consumption has risen from 1.3GW/hr at the end of Q3 2017 to 2.3GW/hr, which equates to US$3,000 spent in electricity for every coin. Due to the rise in mining infrastructure, including rig costs and assuming a 1 year lifespan of the rigs pushes the marginal cost up to US$9,380. We have included a matrix which assumes a 50% per quarter rise in hash power and the phased introduction of the new, more efficient Dragonmint mining rigs. The lifetime of a rig is debatable so we have included varied rig lifetimes.

Our analysis highlights that Bitcoin continues to trade above the marginal cost of production, although as the hash power of the network rises, the marginal cost rises sharply too.

Although Bitcoin is not a commodity, it is trading well above its marginal cost as it remains a very young digital asset, heavily influenced by regulatory risk, investor hype and the prospect that conceptually it is a compelling idea.

James Butterfill, Head of Research & Investment Strategy at ETF Securities

James Butterfill joined ETF Securities as Head of Research & Investment Strategy in 2015. James is responsible for leading the strategic direction of the global research team, ensuring that clients receive up-to-date, expert insight into global macroeconomic and asset class specific developments.

James has a wealth of experience in strategy, economics and asset allocation gained at HSBC and most recently in his role as Multi- Asset Fund Manager and Global Equity Strategist at Coutts. James holds a Bachelor of Engineering from the University of Exeter and an MSc in Geophysics from Keele University.

ETF Securities to sell its European Exchange-Traded Commodity, Currency and Short-and-Leveraged Business to WisdomTree

ETF Securities to sell its European Exchange-Traded Commodity, Currency and Short-and-Leveraged Business to WisdomTree

ETF Securities Limited (ETF Securities) has agreed to sell its European exchange-traded commodity, currency and short-and-leveraged business to WisdomTree Investments, Inc. (WisdomTree), the Nasdaq-listed (ticker: WETF) and New York headquartered global exchange-traded product provider. ETF Securities to sell its European Exchange-Traded Commodity, Currency and Short-and-Leveraged Business to WisdomTree.

The business being sold comprises all the European operations of ETF Securities, excluding the ETF platform.

The business being sold to WisdomTree has a comprehensive range of commodity, currency and short-and-leveraged products, AUM of $17.6 billion* and more than 50 dedicated staff. WisdomTree and ETF Securities will work to ensure that integration is seamless and expect no change to the current high standards of service and operations experienced by our customers and partners.
The sale is subject to regulatory approval and is currently anticipated to close in late Q1 2018.

WisdomTree and ETF Securities share a common entrepreneurial history and drive, with similar cultures and commitment to innovation. Together we can best meet the evolving needs of our customers. By combining our ETP business with WisdomTree and becoming its largest shareholder we are creating a leading independent global ETP provider. The new firm will be uniquely positioned to flourish in the years ahead, continuing to deliver huge value for customers and stakeholders.

Our press release can be found here

* Source: ETF Securities, as at 9/11/2017

Please contact us if you have any questions:

Catarina Donat Marques
ETF Securities (UK) Limited
T +44 20 7448 4386
E catarina.donatmarques@etfsecurities.com

Important Information

This communication has been issued and approved for the purpose of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 by ETF Securities (UK) Limited (“ETFS UK”) which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”).

The information contained in this communication is for your general information only and is neither an offer for sale nor a solicitation of an offer to buy securities. This communication should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance and any investments may go down in value.

This document is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or any other step in furtherance of a public offering of shares or securities in the United States or any province or territory thereof. Neither this document nor any copy hereof should be taken, transmitted or distributed (directly or indirectly) into the United States.

This communication may contain independent market commentary prepared by ETFS UK based on publicly available information. Although ETFS UK endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the content in this communication, ETFS UK does not warrant or guarantee its accuracy or correctness. Any third party data providers used to source the information in this communication make no warranties or representation of any kind relating to such data. Where ETFS UK has expressed its own opinions related to product or market activity, these views may change. Neither ETFS UK, nor any affiliate, nor any of their respective officers, directors, partners, or employees accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication or its contents.

ETFS UK is required by the FCA to clarify that it is not acting for you in any way in relation to the investment or investment activity to which this communication relates. In particular, ETFS UK will not provide any investment services to you and or advise you on the merits of, or make any recommendation to you in relation to, the terms of any transaction. No representative of ETFS UK is authorised to behave in any way which would lead you to believe otherwise. ETFS UK is not, therefore, responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients and you should seek your own independent legal, investment and tax or other advice as you see fit.

 

 

GranitShares skakar om ETF-marknaden

GranitShares skakar om ETF-marknaden

GraniteShares är en ny, så kallad disruptive leverantör av börshandlade fonder. Bolaget har precis lanserat två nya ETFer som skall ge investerarna en bred exponering mot råvaror till låga kostnader. I måndags var dagen när GranitShares skakar om ETF-marknaden genom att lansera GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) och GraniteShares S & P GSCI Commodity Broad Strategy. K-1 ETF (COMG).

Finansierat av Bain Capital Ventures och andra välkända investerare

Företagets ambitiösa affärsplan fångade snabbt investerarnas intresse och den nya ETF-leverantören kunde säkerställde riskkapitalfinansiering från Bain Capital Ventures och andra välkända investerare. GranitShares kan ses som en störande faktor i ETF-rummet eftersom företaget försöker kullkasta det traditionella sättet som investerare fått exponering mot råvaror. Orsaken är att grundarna ansåg att det fanns ett omedelbart behov av innovation. De anser också att investerare har fått betala för mycket för att få exponering mot råvarumarknaden.

Disruptive i ETF-marknaden

Rhind förklarade att det finns tre sätt att vara störande, eller disruptive, i branschen: Först, ha den lägsta kostnaden eftersom det påverkar konkurrenternas marginaler och produkter. För det andra, uppfinna överlägsna produkter med bättre omslag. Slutligen vara först på marknaden.

Rhind upptäckte att det fanns gott om alternativ som erbjöd investerare exponering mot råvarumarknaden som en underliggande tillgångsklass, men är det mest effektiva? Är detta den bästa möjliga strukturen? Var två av de frågor han ställde sig.

COMB och COMG jämförs med Bloomberg Commodity Index respektive S & P GSCI Index. Fonderna är uppbyggda som 1940-aktiefonder, utfärdar inte K-1s och är två av de börshandlade fonder med lägst förvaltningskostnad bland de bredare råvarufonderna. Driftskostnaden för dessa två börshandlade fonder hamnar på 0,25 respektive 0,35 procent. GranitShares skakar om ETF-marknaden med sina nya avgifter men utbudet är ännu så länge begränsat. Kanske kommer det mer?

Aktiv förvaltning

GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF förvaltas aktivt och baseras på Bloomberg Commodity Index, med exponering mot aluminium, kaffe, koppar, majs, bomull, råolja (WTI och Brent), guld, diesel, lean hogs Levande boskap, naturgas, nickel, silver, sojamjöl, sojabönolja, sojabönor, socker, blyfri gas, vete (Chicago och KC HRW) och zink. Den aktiva förvaltaren utövar sin rätt att försöka optimera fondens investeringsresultat.

GraniteShares S & P GSCI Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF förvaltas också aktivt, men bygger på S & P GSCI Index, med exponering mot råolja (WTI och Brent), majs, levande boskap, vete (Chicago och Kansas), värmeolja (heating oil), Gasolja, guld, koppar, RBOB bensin, sojabönor, naturgas, aluminium, len hogs, socker, bomull, cattle feeder, kaffe, zink, bly, nickel, kakao och silver.

Fonderna heter ”No K-1” eftersom de är utformade för att fungera annorlunda än råvarubaserade börshandlade fonder som distribuerar det besvärliga ”Schema K-1” till aktieägarna under skattesäsongen. ETFerna är utformade för att beskattas som en vanlig fond och kommer därför att leverera en ”Form 1099” till investerare. För att leverera 1099s i enlighet med gällande skattelag investerar ETFerna i ett underliggande dotterbolag. I ett försök att hjälpa investerare att undvika K-1 s investerar ETF: erna inte direkt i råvaruterminer men får snarare exponering för dessa investeringar genom att investera en del av sina tillgångar i GraniteShares BCOM Cayman Limited, ett helägt dotterbolag till fonden.

Enligt Caymanöarnas lagar

Dotterbolaget är inte ett värdepappersföretag registrerat enligt lagen om investeringsbolag från 1940 och har samma investeringsmål och följer samma allmänna investeringspolicyer och restriktioner som fonderna.

Copper outlook 2017: eighth year of supply deficit

ETF Securities Commodity Research: Copper outlook 2017: eighth year of supply deficit

Copper outlook 2017: eighth year of supply deficit

Summary

  • Investor optimism for copper has been buoyed by miner outages representing close to 12% of global capacity.
  • Copper is likely to enter another year of deficit, but stocks are still elevated and will cap price gains. While capex cuts have been aggressive, it will take time for supply to fall. Projects in pipeline are unlikely to be cancelled.
  • Demand, however, is likely to remain strong as global growth and infrastructure spending increase. Over the longer term, a shift toward electric vehicles will provide an additional source of demand.

Investors optimistic

Copper has rallied 40% since January 2016, erasing all losses since May 2015. Investors have become increasingly optimistic about the metal’s prospects with speculative positioning in copper futures recently hitting an all-time high, more than 2.5 times its historic average. While the price of the metal remains 40% below the peak reached in 2011, many question whether the rally can continue.

(click to enlarge)

Mine outages

Driving much of the upswing in prices in recent weeks has been several mine outages. Workers at the world’s largest copper mine, Escondida in Chile, have been on strike for three weeks and negotiations between unions, the mine operator (BHP Billiton) and government mediators have yet to be scheduled.

The world second largest copper mine, Grasberg, operated by Freeport-McMoRan Inc, has also faced outages. The Indonesian government has not renewed Freeport’s copper ore export licence that expired in February 2017. The Grasberg mine is also facing difficulty selling domestically, with PT Smelting (its sole domestic offtaker of copper concentrate) expected to be on strike until March.

The Las Bambas mine in Peru has had its roads blocked by protestors who want the government to invest more in local infrastructure rather than just mine infrastructure.

The three mines account for close to 12% of global mine capacity. Outages in 2016 were usually low, accounting for less than 1% of expected supply, but that could rise substantially in 2017 if the issues at Escondida, Grasberg and Las Bambas are not resolved soon.

Copper supply deficit

Based on refined production growing 1.7% and refined usage only growing 1%, the International Copper Study Group (ICSG) believes that the deficit will turn into a surplus this year. However, we believe that demand growth will be more robust. A 2% increase in refined copper use would see the market remain in a deficit. Global manufacturing PMIs are at a 34- month high and could rise to a 6-year high this year. Given the growth in manufacturing and infrastructure spending, we believe that demand is likely to surpass ICSG’s conservative forecast.

(click to enlarge)

Ahead of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China to be held in Autumn 2017, Chinese authorities will seek political stability. That will mean that economic stimulus will remain in play, which will favour continued spending on infrastructure and strong demand from the manufacturing sector. China accounts for more than 50% of global copper demand.

Deep cuts to copper mining capex

Capex growth in the copper mining industry has been negative for four consecutive years. Capex in Q4 2016 hit lowest levels since Q3 2007. The capex cuts will have a delayed impact in biting into the supply and therefore maybe not be fully felt in 2017. The ICSG assumes that mine output in 2017 will remain the same as 2016 (after 4% growth in 2016). However, the outages mentioned above could drive a reduction.

(click to enlarge)

Project cancellations unlikely

The projects that are in the pipeline from prior year’s investment are unlikely to be cancelled. The cash costs for new mines is low, at around US$1.41/lb and significantly below US$2.70/lb where copper is currently trading.

(click to enlarge)

Copper stocks remain elevated

Despite the seven years of copper market deficit, stocks of copper remain elevated. Most of these are producer stocks. We believe that the elevated stocks will cap price gains, but will be a clear incentive for refiners not to increase production substantially despite the increase in copper price over the past year.

(click to enlarge)

Long term demand evolution

Given the historic negative relationship between income levels and intensity of copper use, some fear that as China becomes richer, its copper intensity will decline as it becomes less focused on exporting manufactured goods and building infrastructure and more focused on consumption. As we expressed in Exploring rising global infrastructure needs, we believe China’s infrastructure demands are still likely to rise over the next 15 years.

China’s shift away from manufacturing and towards consumption is not necessarily negative for copper. For example, the copper intensity of cars will rise with the growth of electric vehicles. Regular cars contain approximately 20kgs of copper. Electric vehicles consume about 80kgs of copper. While electric vehicles account for less than 1% of global sales today, consensus estimates that it will rise to 4% by 2025, proving an additional source of demand. Auto sales in China are likely to continue to grow in line with its rising affluence and sales of electric vehicles maybe further be encouraged by tightening emission standards.

(Click to enlarge)

Important Information

General

This communication has been issued and approved for the purpose of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 by ETF Securities (UK) Limited (“ETFS UK”) which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”).

The information contained in this communication is for your general information only and is neither an offer for sale nor a solicitation of an offer to buy securities. This communication should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance and any investments may go down in value. This document is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or any other step in furtherance of a public offering of shares or securities in the United States or any province or territory thereof. Neither this document nor any copy hereof should be taken, transmitted or distributed (directly or indirectly) into the United States. This communication may contain independent market commentary prepared by ETFS UK based on publicly available information. Although ETFS UK endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the content in this communication, ETFS UK does not warrant or guarantee its accuracy or correctness. Any third party data providers used to source the information in this communication make no warranties or representation of any kind relating to such data. Where ETFS UK has expressed its own opinions related to product or market activity, these views may change. Neither ETFS UK, nor any affiliate, nor any of their respective officers, directors, partners, or employees accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication or its contents. ETFS UK is required by the FCA to clarify that it is not acting for you in any way in relation to the investment or investment activity to which this communication relates. In particular, ETFS UK will not provide any investment services to you and or advise you on the merits of, or make any recommendation to you in relation to, the terms of any transaction. No representative of ETFS UK is authorised to behave in any way which would lead you to believe otherwise. ETFS UK is not, therefore, responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients and you should seek your own independent legal, investment and tax or other advice as you see fit.

Gold Supported by Cracks in Market Confidence

Gold Supported by Cracks in Market Confidence

Gold Supported by Cracks in Market Confidence. Since the financial crisis of 2008-2009, markets have been obsessed with what the Federal Reserve does or doesn’t say or do. This past January, the Fed was relatively quiet, giving no indications of an early year rate increase. This silence has forced the markets to find a second obsession: The Trump Administration. It appears as if there will be at least four more years of obsessing over President Trump’s actions and statements (and perhaps even more importantly, his tweets). The good news for gold is that markets are beginning to reflect reality following the irrational euphoria that occurred after the November U.S. presidential election.

Encouraging Start for Gold As Risks Come Into Focus

The risks of a Trump presidency, which we have been highlighting since the election, are coming into clearer focus. President Trump broke with tradition (again) by indicating that a strong U.S. dollar is not necessarily in the best interest of the United States. His chief trading advisor and incoming U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin also made comments that were interpreted as being unsupportive of the dollar. Controversial executive orders and anti-trade maneuvering have damaged confidence and contributed to further dollar weakness. As a result, gold and gold shares have had an encouraging start to the year, bouncing off oversold yearend levels and benefitting from downward moves in the U.S. dollar. Gold gained $58.38 (5.1%) to end January the month at $1,210.65 per ounce. The NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index1 (GDMNTR) gained 13.7% while the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index2 (MVGDXJTR) advanced 17.9%. Markets are generally fairly good at pricing in demand trends, earnings expectations, technology innovations, and many other things. However, one thing markets have great difficulty putting a price on is uncertainty. Just two weeks in, and it appears that Trump’s administration will be unconventional, controversial, and unpredictable. If we could measure the level of market uncertainty over the next four years, it would likely be off the charts. Many people in the U.S. and internationally are genuinely fearful of the future. With interest rates still at microscopic levels and U.S. stocks at all-time highs, gold, in our view, is an obvious investment alternative as a hedge against the potential for uncertain outcomes that may easily damage other asset classes.

Gold Trading Explained: Physical vs. Paper

Given our gold investing expertise, we are often asked about the nature of the gold market, as some investors are perplexed by the volumes traded. Bloomberg recently released an article in which the CPM Group, a research firm specializing in precious and industrial metals, quantified the global gold market. In 2015, 310,358 tonnes (10 billion ounces) of gold were traded globally. The London over-the-counter (OTC) market amounted to 144,000 tonnes, or 46.3%, of the gold traded, while the New York futures market accounted for 130,350 tonnes or 42.0%. These numbers stand in stark contrast to the physical demand of 4,124 tonnes estimated by Reuters GFMS in 2015. The magnitude of the trading stands out further when considering that there have been approximately 170,000 tonnes of gold mined since the beginning of time. These markets enable a huge portion of gold to trade without moving a single ounce. Participants in the futures market understand and expect this, so trades are only rarely settled with physical gold. The OTC market is a physical market and much of the gold taken for delivery globally is settled through London. However, an OTC ounce can change hands many times in a day, so only a fraction of the gold traded in London is actually moved to a new owner. Thus, the overwhelming volume of gold is traded in paper transactions, not physical metal.

Treat Gold as a Financial Asset, Not as a Traditional Commodity

Although there are many people who believe gold is a useless relic, the millions who invest in gold believe differently. To make money in this sector, it is crucial to understand the behavior of dedicated gold investors. The most important thing to recognize is that gold (and its paper proxies) is used as a financial asset, not a commodity. It is a safe haven3 store of wealth with no liabilities and has been used as such throughout human history. Therefore, the gold price is not driven by the same supply/demand fundamentals as soybeans, copper, or crude, for example. The chart shows a traditional commodity price analysis with surpluses and deficits in the physical gold market since 1988. Notice there are many years when the gold price rose when there was a physical surplus. Likewise, there are also years when the price fell and there was a deficit. This doesn’t make economic sense, which makes a physical supply/demand analysis an unreliable price indicator. We believe there are three possible reasons for this: 1) the global physical market is difficult to measure accurately; 2) the huge above ground stores of gold; and 3) investment drivers in the paper market can overwhelm the physical market.

Gold Supply vs. Price Change

(click to enlarge)

Western Investment Demand is Behind the Wheel

As 88% of global trading volume occurs in New York and London, we believe the dominant driver of gold prices is Western investment demand. Western investors and others use gold to monetize their views on currencies, interest rates, geopolitical risk, systemic financial risk, central bank policies, inflation, deflation, and tail risk.4 These are the primary factors that help drive the gold price. Technicals are also important, as many investors make decisions based on chart patterns. Prices can be volatile, and this volatility is another aspect that tends to attract certain investors. Commercial players, such as jewelers and producers, use these markets to trade metal or hedge, although we suspect this to be a relatively minor driver compared with investment demand. According to the CPM Group, China and India are the two largest gold consumers with 1,803 tonnes of combined physical demand in 2015. While this is 44% of physical metal consumption, these two countries account for just 7.9% (24,518 tonnes) of global gold transactions. India has no modern gold exchanges and the Shanghai Gold Exchange and the emerging Chinese futures market have a very long way to go to rival the Western trading hubs. As such, even though Asia accounts for the majority of physical demand, this region tends to be a secondary driver of gold prices. The local markets in India and China typically trade at a premium or discount to Western markets depending on local demand levels. Asian investors are sensitive to rising prices, as demand tends to increase during periods of price weakness. Asian buying typically helps establish a floor for gold prices, while Western investment demand is usually responsible for driving it higher.

Manipulation in Gold Market? Maybe. But No Lasting Effect.

We are also asked, because of the unusual structure of the gold market, if the gold market is manipulated. We would not be surprised to find that the gold market has been manipulated, but to a lesser extent than other markets. For example, currency markets are often manipulated by governments. Bond markets have been manipulated by the central banks since the financial crisis. Some governments, banks, and hedge funds may occasionally derive some benefit from lower gold prices. We periodically have seen curious price movements caused by large paper market orders at times of thin trading. This has happened especially in weak markets. It would be naïve, however, to dismiss the gold market as “rigged” based on this. While the magnitude of the paper market is remarkable, it is still driven by gold fundamentals. We believe any attempts at manipulation, if successful, can only influence prices over short periods. The gold market is too large for any manipulation to have a lasting effect.
by Joe Foster, Portfolio Manager and Strategist With more than 30 years of gold industry experience, Foster began his gold career as a boots on the ground geologist, evaluating mining exploration and development projects. Foster is Portfolio Manager and Strategist for the Gold and Precious Metals strategy.. Please note that the information herein represents the opinion of the author and these opinions may change at any time and from time to time. 1NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (GDMNTR) is a modified market capitalization-weighted index comprised of publicly traded companies involved primarily in the mining for gold. 2MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (MVGDXJTR) is a rules-based, modified market capitalization-weighted, float-adjusted index comprised of a global universe of publicly traded small- and medium-capitalization companies that generate at least 50% of their revenues from gold and/or silver mining, hold real property that has the potential to produce at least 50% of the company’s revenue from gold or silver mining when developed, or primarily invest in gold or silver. 3Safe haven is an investment that is expected to retain its value or even increase its value in times of market turbulence. 4Tail risk is a form of portfolio risk that arises when the possibility that an investment will move more than three standard deviations from the mean is greater than what is shown by a normal distribution.

Important Disclosures

This commentary originates from VanEck Associates Corporation (“VanEck”) and does not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation to buy any security. VanEck’s opinions stated in this commentary may deviate from opinions presented by other VanEck departments or companies. Information and opinions in this commentary are based on VanEck’s analysis. Any forecasts and projections contained in the commentary appear from the named sources. All opinions in this commentary are, regardless of source, given in good faith, and may only be valid as of the stated date of this commentary and are subject to change without notice in subsequent versions of the commentary. Any projections, market outlooks or estimates in this material are forward-looking statements and are based upon certain assumptions that are solely the opinion of VanEck. Any projections, outlooks or assumptions should not be construed to be indicative of the actual events which will occur.

No investment advice

The commentary is intended only to provide general and preliminary information to investors and shall not be construed as the basis for any investment decision. This commentary has been prepared by VanEck as general information for use of investors to whom the commentary has been distributed, but it is not intended as a personal recommendation of particular financial instruments or strategies and thus it does not provide individually tailored investment advice, and does not take into account the individual investor’s financial situation, existing holdings or liabilities, investment knowledge and experience, investment objective and horizon or risk profile and preferences. The investor must particularly ensure the suitability of an investment as regards his/her financial and tax situation and investment objectives. The investor bears the risk of losses in connection with an investment. Before acting on any information in this publication or report, it is recommendable to consult one’s financial advisor. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and the information contained in this material is not intended to be, nor should it be construed or used as investment, tax or legal advice, any recommendation, or an offer to sell, or a solicitation of any offer to buy, an interest in any security. References to specific securities and their issuers or sectors are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities or gain exposure to such sectors. Each investor shall make his/her own appraisal of the tax and other financial merits of his/her investment.

Sources

This commentary may be based on or contain information, such as opinions, recommendations, estimates, price targets and valuations which emanate from: VanEck portfolio managers, analysts or representatives, publicly available information, information from other units or Companies of VanEck, or other named sources. To the extent this commentary is based on or contain information emerging from other sources (“Other Sources”) than VanEck (“External Information”), VanEck has deemed the Other Sources to be reliable but neither the VanEck companies, others associated or affiliated with said companies nor any other person, do guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of the External Information.

Limitation of liability

VanEck and its associated and affiliated companies assume no liability as regards to any investment, divestment or retention decision taken by the investor on the basis of this commentary. In no event will VanEck or other associated and affiliated companies be liable for direct, indirect or incidental, special or consequential damages resulting from the information in this publication or report.

Risk information

The risk of investing in certain financial instruments, is generally high, as their market value is exposed to a lot of different factors such as the operational and financial conditions of the relevant company, growth prospects, change in interest rates, the economic and political environment, foreign exchange rates, shifts in market sentiments etc. Where an investment or security is denominated in a different currency to the investor’s currency of reference, changes in rates of exchange may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income of or from that investment to the investor. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized. When investing in individual shares, the investor may lose all or part of the investments.

Conflicts of interest

VanEck, its affiliates or staff of VanEck companies, may perform services for, solicit business from, hold long or short positions in, or otherwise be interested in the investments (including derivatives) of any company mentioned in this commentary. To limit possible conflicts of interest and counter the abuse of inside knowledge, the representatives, portfolio managers and analysts of VanEck are subject to internal rules on sound ethical conduct, the management of inside information, handling of unpublished research material, contact with other units of VanEck and personal account dealing. The internal rules have been prepared in accordance with applicable legislation and relevant industry standards. The object of the internal rules is for example to ensure that no analyst will abuse or cause others to abuse confidential information. This commentary has been prepared following the VanEck Conflict of Interest Policy.

Distribution restriction

This commentary is not intended for, and must not be distributed to private customers. No part of this material may be reproduced in full or in part in any form, or referred to in any other publication without express written permission of VanEck. ©2017, VanEck.

Index Descriptions

All indices named in the commentary are unmanaged indices and include the reinvestment of all dividends, but do not reflect the payment of transaction costs, advisory fees or expenses that are associated with an investment in the Fund. An index’s performance is not illustrative of the Fund’s performance. Indices are not securities in which investments can be made.