Russia, Land of Education and a Growing Tech Industry

Russia Van Eck ETF Russia, Land of Education and a Growing Tech IndustryRussia, Land of Education and a Growing Tech Industry

Russia, Land of Education and a Growing Tech Industry Authored by David Feygenson, Senior Analyst, Emerging Markets Equity Strategy, and James Duffy, Product Manager, ETFs

Russia, Land of Education and a Growing Tech Industry. Given Russia’s need to diversify its economy away from both energy and basic materials, the country’s technology and telecommunications industries — increasingly fueled by entrepreneurship among the country’s well educated — offer considerable potential.

The Russian stock market, as measured by the Market Vectors® Russia Index (MVRSXTR), performed particularly well over the first quarter of 2016. Starting the year at 417.9, the Index ended the first three months of the year at 471.1 on March 31, an increase of 12.7%.

Much of this growth can be attributed to technology stocks. Of the 29 stocks that currently make up MVRSXTR, seven are involved in tech or telecom. In terms of market capitalization, these seven stocks make up approximately 17.5% of the overall market as defined by the Market Vectors® Russia Index.

Russia’s Tech Growth is Fueled by a New Generation of Highly Educated Workers

Russia has one of the highest proportions of university graduates in the world, eclipsing levels in Asia, Europe, and North America. Partly due to the Soviet legacy of a focus on education, Russia is still endowed with an excellent education system that produces thousands of university graduates each year.

(click to enlarge) Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), ”Education at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators”, for the year 2014, except for Russia, Chile, Saudi Arabia, and Brazil, which are for the year 2013.

Of young men aged 25-34, about half have completed tertiary education, much higher than the 35% average among OECD countries, and, after Korea, the second highest proportion. Of young women in the same age bracket, about 65% have completed tertiary education, much more than the 46% average for most OECD member and partner countries where data is available.

While some of Russia’s best educated have left the country for greener pastures, many have remained and contributed to a growing tech industry. In recent years, a number of Russian technology companies have gone public, including Yandex (YNDX), the leading search engine in Russia, and Mail.Ru Group (MAIL), the leading portal, social networking, and gaming site in Russia.

Perhaps Russia’s young and educated demographic will continue to foster a growing number of startups that will help to stake its claim as a global player in technology. The Russian market can be accessed through Market Vectors® Russia ETF (RSX®) and Russian small-cap companies through the Market Vectors® Russia Small-Cap ETF (RSXJ®). As of March 31, 2016, Yandex and Mail.Ru comprised 4.04% and 2.41% of RSX, respectively.

Source: FactSet, VanEck, and Market Vectors Index Solutions (MVIS).

ETFs is authored by VanEck thought leaders. VanEck is the sponsor of Market Vectors ETFs and is currently among the largest providers of exchange traded funds (ETFs) in the U.S. and worldwide. Market Vectors ETFs empower investors to help build better portfolios with access to compelling investment themes and strategies. Our ETFs span many global asset classes, and are built to be transparent, liquid, and pure-play reflections of target markets.

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE

This content is published in the United States for residents of specified countries. Investors are subject to securities and tax regulations within their applicable jurisdictions that are not addressed on this content. Nothing in this content should be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell shares of any investment in any jurisdiction where the offer or solicitation would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction, nor is it intended as investment, tax, financial, or legal advice. Investors should seek such professional advice for their particular situation and jurisdiction.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and are current as of the posting date. Commentaries are general in nature and should not be construed as investment advice. Opinions are subject to change with market conditions. All performance information is historical and is not a guarantee of future results.

An investment in the Funds may be subject to risks which include, among others, expropriation and/or nationalization of assets, restrictions on international trade, confiscatory or punitive taxation, regional conflict, political instability, armed conflict, underdeveloped securities markets, inflation, governmental control of economic activity, suspension of redemptions of creation units, and currency fluctuations, all of which may adversely affect the Fund. Foreign and emerging markets investments are subject to risks, which include changes in economic and political conditions, changes in foreign regulations, changes in currency exchange rates, unstable governments, and limited trading capacity which may make these investments volatile in price or difficult to trade. Small- and Medium-capitalization companies may be subject to elevated risks. A Fund’s assets may be concentrated in a particular sector and may be subject to more risk than investments in a diverse group of sectors.

Market Vectors® Russia Index is the exclusive property of Market Vectors Index Solutions GmbH (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Adviser), which has contracted with Solactive AG to maintain and calculate the Index. Solactive AG uses its best efforts to ensure that the Index is calculated correctly. Irrespective of its obligations towards Market Vectors Index Solutions GmbH, Solactive AG has no obligation to point out errors in the Index to third parties. The Market Vectors Russia ETF is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Market Vectors Index Solutions GmbH and Market Vectors Index Solutions GmbH makes no representation regarding the advisability of investing in the Fund.

Fund shares are not individually redeemable and will be issued and redeemed at their Net Asset Value (NAV) only through certain authorized broker-dealers in large, specified blocks of shares called ”creation units” and otherwise can be bought and sold only through exchange trading. Creation units are issued and redeemed principally in kind. Shares may trade at a premium or discount to their NAV in the secondary market.

Investing involves substantial risk and high volatility, including possible loss of principal. An investor should consider the investment objective, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. To obtain a prospectus and summary prospectus, which contains this and other information, call 800.826.2333 or visit vaneck.com. Please read the prospectus and summary prospectus carefully before investing.

Central Bank Policy Concerns Support Gold in March

Central Bank Policy Concerns Support Gold in March

Central Bank Policy Concerns Support Gold in March For the month ended March 31, 2016

Gold reached a new high for the year of $1,285 per ounce on March 11 when the European Central Bank (ECB) announced its upcoming plans, which include reducing rates on overnight bank deposits by 10 basis points to -0.4%, expanding quantitative easing to include corporate bonds in addition to sovereign bonds, and adding a new series of bank loans. Gold’s gain reflects investors’ worries over the financial risk and currency debasement that may come with negative rates, more printing of money, and relatively easy credit. Bloomberg reports that in February sovereign bonds issued primarily in Japan and Europe worth more than $7 trillion in U.S. dollars had negative yields. Meanwhile, Gluskin Sheff1 calculates the average yield on $23 trillion of global sovereign bonds outstanding has dropped below 0.7% for the first time in history.

The Potential Risks of Negative Interest Rates

Some of the potential risks of negative rates include: 1) the fundamental framework of the financial system is simply not designed to operate with negative rates; 2) providers of long-term services, like pension funds and insurance companies, have trouble meeting goals and expectations; 3) currency relationships and valuations become impaired; and 4) investors may disengage from the financial system. Comments from central bank officials seem oblivious to the dangers that gold investors see in the radical policies that are being promulgated. For example, ECB President Mario Draghi has said that he will do whatever is necessary to revive inflation. International Monetary Fund (IMF) Managing Director Christine Lagarde claims that the world economy would be worse off without negative rates and, additionally, that the finance sector may need to implement new business models. Following the March 29 speech to the New York Financial Club by Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Janet Yellen during which she stated that the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) would still have considerable scope to ease policy if rates in the U.S. hit 0% again, the market lowered its expectation for further Fed rate increases.

Gold Bullion Posted A Small Loss for March, While Gold Shares Were Strong

Overall for the month, gold trended lower from its March highs, ending the month at $1,232.71 per ounce for a small loss of $6.03 (0.5%). Gold shares reached their highs for the year on March 17 and the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index2 (GDMNTR) gained 4.0% for the month. The junior gold stocks had been trailing the benchmark, however, but the Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners Index3 (MVGDXJTR) caught up with the GDMNTR for the year by outperforming in March with an 8.6% gain.

Gold ETPs Enjoy Record Flows in 1Q

The 300 tonne flow of gold into bullion exchange-traded products (ETPs) in the first quarter (1Q) was the largest quarterly inflow since 2009, a period of heightened demand due to the credit crisis. Despite these record ETP flows, other demand drivers have been lacking. Jewelers in India were on strike for three weeks in March to protest a tax increase. Bloomberg reports Chinese purchases of gold for the first two months of 2016 were down 56% from a year ago. The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) raised its gold reserves by 10 tonnes in February, its smallest monthly increase since it began reporting gold holdings last year. Producer hedging, which involves selling, increased as we count seven companies that announced new hedge positions in the first quarter. This was entirely short-term tactical hedging to lock in profits for new start-ups, high-cost short-life mines, or mines in weak currency countries. The weak physical demand from Asia and increased hedging suggest that overwhelming investment demand, mainly from the West, has been a primary driver of the strong gold market this year.

Gold Enjoyed its Best Quarter Since 1986

This was the best quarter for gold performance since 1986 and gold stock gains were of a similar magnitude. In the first quarter, gold advanced 16.1%, while the GDMNTR was up 46.3% and the MVGDXJTR climbed 45.4%. These are the types of early gains we expected to see in a sector that has been radically oversold. Since gold crashed in 2013, short sellers have dominated the market with many banks calling for lower prices, making the bear market one of the worst ever. Now it looks like we will see how vulnerable the new market is. Inflows to bullion ETPs have slowed and Comex4 net speculative long positions are the highest since 2012. As of April 5, gold has declined $56 per ounce from its March 11 high and looks to be into its first significant consolidation of the year. Holding above $1,200 per ounce would be a very bullish sign. However, a more plausible expectation based on trends in the early stage of past bull markets would be a correction to around the $1,150 per ounce level. A fall below $1,100 per ounce would suggest the bears have regained the upper hand, although we see this as the least likely outcome.

Core Inflation in U.S. is Worth Watching

Although we haven’t paid much attention to consumer price inflation5 (CPI) for decades, we believe it now merits watching. The era of disinflation that was punctuated by the deflation of the great recession may be coming to a close. Normally we prefer to include food and energy when evaluating inflation trends. However, because of the recent crash in oil prices, we believe it is important to strip out energy volatility to see what is happening with underlying core inflation. The chart below (Figure 1) highlights the rise in core inflation over the past 14 months that has the potential to form a new trend. The Fed has a dual mandate: full employment and consumer price stability. At 5% unemployment, it’s generally considered that the labor market is at full employment. Except for the extraordinary crisis-driven deflation in 2009, the core CPI chart looks reasonably stable. Yet for some reason the Fed and other central banks are trying extremely hard to escalate inflation. They do not appear worried by the asset price inflation that easy money policies have brought to stocks, bonds, and real estate. In past cycles the Fed remained too easy for too long. This is looking like a cycle in which the central banks remain way too easy for way too long, in our opinion. Perhaps this cycle will be different from the ones that brought about the tech bust and subprime crash. In addition to the usual asset bubbles that inevitably burst, we might be adding an inflationary cycle in goods and services. There is a distantly familiar name for that in a low-growth world: stagflation.

(click to enlarge)

A Welcome Sojourn to Gold Mines in the Australian Outback

Getting far away from a macroeconomic scene that might become quite depressing for those investors without investments in gold or gold shares, we spent time in the Australian outback looking at a number of gold properties. Australia is the second largest gold producer behind China, and ranks ahead of both Russia and the U.S. We haven’t been to Australia in many years because much of the gold there has been produced by North American or South African majors who acquired many of the Australian producers 10 to 15 years ago. The Australian operations formed a smallish component of the global majors, which made it difficult to justify a 22-hour flight combined with 105°F heat on arrival. But recently, there has been a remarkable renaissance in mid-tier and junior producers in Australia made possible by: 1) the 28% fall in the Australian dollar (AUD) since 2013 that has reduced costs in U.S. dollar terms, 2) North American companies divesting non-core mines to help pay down debt, and 3) operational improvements and discoveries. Companies that a few years ago did not exist or were avoided, such as Saracen, Northern Star, and Newmarket Gold, are now in our portfolio.

One of the drawbacks of investing in Australian companies is their short mine lives. Reserve lives are typically five years or less. However, we have gained an understanding of the resource base and exploration potential of these properties that indicate true mine lives are closer to the 10-year time frame that is common internationally. Good management teams have mitigated the operating risks, which, we believe, leaves currency as the dominant risk facing these Australian companies. However, we view the rise of the Aussie dollar to parity with the U.S. dollar in 2011/2012 as the exception, brought on by a China-driven commodities boom that is not likely to repeat in our lifetimes. The currency collapse brings it closer to historic norms. From 1985 to 2005 the AUD averaged US$0.70, close to its current value of US$0.75.

Download Commentary PDF with Fund specific information and performance»
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE

1 Gluskin Sheff + Associates Inc., a Canadian independent wealth management firm, manages investment portfolios for high net worth investors, including entrepreneurs, professionals, family trusts, private charitable foundations, and estates.

2 NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (GDMNTR) is a modified market capitalization-weighted index comprised of publicly traded companies involved primarily in the mining for gold.

3 Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners Index (MVGDXJTR) is a rules-based, modified market capitalization-weighted, float-adjusted index comprised of a global universe of publicly traded small- and medium-capitalization companies that generate at least 50% of their revenues from gold and/or silver mining, hold real property that has the potential to produce at least 50% of the company’s revenue from gold or silver mining when developed, or primarily invest in gold or silver.

4 The primary market for trading metals such as gold, silver, copper, and aluminum. Formerly known as the Commodity Exchange Inc., the COMEX merged with the New York Mercantile Exchange in 1994 and became the division responsible for metals trading.

5 A comprehensive measure used for estimation of price changes in a basket of goods and services representative of consumption expenditure in an economy.

This content is published in the United States for residents of specified countries. Investors are subject to securities and tax regulations within their applicable jurisdictions that are not addressed on this content. Nothing in this content should be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell shares of any investment in any jurisdiction where the offer or solicitation would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction, nor is it intended as investment, tax, financial, or legal advice. Investors should seek such professional advice for their particular situation and jurisdiction.

Any indices listed are unmanaged indices and include the reinvestment of all dividends, but do not reflect the payment of transaction costs, advisory fees or expenses that are associated with an investment in the Fund. An index’s performance is not illustrative of the Fund’s performance. Indices are not securities in which investments can be made.

Please note that the information herein represents the opinion of the portfolio manager and these opinions may change at any time and from time to time. Not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. Historical performance is not indicative of future results; current data may differ from data quoted. Current market conditions may not continue. Non-VanEck proprietary information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of VanEck. ©VanEck. All rights reserved.
You can lose money by investing in the Fund. Any investment in the Fund should be part of an overall investment program, not a complete program. The Fund is subject to the risks associated with concentrating its assets in the gold industry, which can be significantly affected by international economic, monetary and political developments. The Fund’s overall portfolio may decline in value due to developments specific to the gold industry. The Fund’s investments in foreign securities involve risks related to adverse political and economic developments unique to a country or a region, currency fluctuations or controls, and the possibility of arbitrary action by foreign governments, including the takeover of property without adequate compensation or imposition of prohibitive taxation. The Fund is subject to risks associated with investments in debt securities, derivatives, commodity-linked instruments, illiquid securities, asset-backed securities, and small- or mid-cap companies. The Fund is also subject to inflation risk, short-sales risk, market risk, non-diversification risk, leverage risk, credit risk and counterparty risk. Please see the prospectus and summary prospectus for information on these as well as other risk considerations.

Please call 800.826.2333 or visit vaneck.com for performance information current to the most recent month end and for a free prospectus and summary prospectus. An investor should consider the Fund’s investment objective, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing. The prospectus and summary prospectus contain this as well as other information. Please read them carefully before investing.

Gold and Precious Metals

by Joe Foster,, Portfolio Manager and Strategist
With more than 30 years of gold industry experience, Foster began his gold career as a boots on the ground geologist, evaluating mining exploration and development projects. Foster is Portfolio Manager and Strategist for the Gold and Precious Metals strategy.

Israel, en möjlighet till uppvärdering?

Israel, en möjlighet till uppvärdering?

Israel, en möjlighet till uppvärdering? Utanför USAs gränser har aktiemarknaderna i gemen haft en tung start 2016, men vi ser att det finns en möjlighet till uppvärdering på vissa utvecklade marknader, och det finns en börs i synnerhet som kan sticka ut, Tel Aviv börsen i Israel. Sedan Israel under 2009 uppgraderades från emerging market till utvecklad marknad, utgör israeliska aktier en mycket försumbar andel i de globala indexen och börshandlade fonderna.

Den som vill ha en exponering mot den israeliska aktiemarknaden kan emellertid få detta genom den ETF som heter ISRA. Market Vectors Israel ETF (NYSE: ISRA) är en landspecifik börshandlad fond som replikerar utvecklingen av israeliska företag, listade på börserna i Tel Aviv och Europa. Sedan årets början har denna ETF backat med knappa fyra procent, mätt i dollar, men det är betydligt bättre än MSCI EAFE index. Under den senaste månaden har denna börshandlade fond stigit med cirka 2,2 procent.

En närmare titt på ISRA

ISRA replikerar utvecklingen av Bluestar Israel Global Index, ett index som fokuserar på de sektorer som driver den nya israeliska ekonomin, Hälsovård och teknik. Dessa sektorer står för över 63 procent av ISRAs vikt, vilket ger denna ETF exponering mot några av mycket välkända företag som också listas på Nasdaq, till exempel Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd (ADR) (NASDAQ: TEVA) och Perrigo Company plc Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: PRGO). Mer än hälften av innehaven i ISRA är endera företag inom tekniksektorn eller hälsovårdssektorn. Totalt äger ISRA aktier i 113 företag.

Precis som på så gott som alla andra utvecklade marknader är det penningpolitiken som har stor påverkan för den israeliska ekonomin och därmed också för ISRA. De senaste studierna visar att inflationen spås vara fortsatt låg i landet, väl under Bank of Israels målintervall på 1,5 till 3,0 procent. BoI bedömer att inflationen inte kommer nå denna nivå innan mitten av nästa år som tidigast.

ISRA kan betraktas som en satsning på hälsovård/läkemedel med tanke på denna ETFs exponering mot företag som Perrigo och Teva. Det skall även framhållas att den israeliska tech sektorn har lockat utländska investerare. I allmänhet är värderingarna låga på mätt mot amerikanska motsvarigheter som komponenter Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSCO) och Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC) som båda nyligen aviserat att de har för avsikt att förvärva mindre israeliska teknikföretag.

Redo för konsolidering?

Det vägda genomsnittliga marknadsvärdet på ISRAs innehav är 10,8 miljarder USD enligt Market Vectors data. Värdet dras emellertid upp av Perrigo och Teva, och exkluderas dessa företag är det genomsnittliga företaget värderat som ett mid cap företag i Sverige. Det kan ses som ett tecken på att Israels teknologisektor är mogen för konsolidering i händerna på kassarika amerikanska teknikjättar.

High Yield Recovers, Fallen Angels Soar

High Yield Recovers, Fallen Angels Soar

High Yield Recovers, Fallen Angels Soar. Fallen angel bonds continued their history of outperformance, ending the first quarter ahead of the broad high yield bond market (+6.54% vs. +3.25%), as measured by the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index (H0FA) and BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Index (H0A0). The basic industry and energy sectors helped fallen angels’ performance, as oil prices bounced in February. Fallen angels are high yield corporate bonds that are originally issued with investment grade credit ratings. They offer a potential value proposition, as they tend to price in a high degree of risk ahead of downgrades to high yield, and may become oversold due to forced selling by institutional holders.

Fallen Angel Bonds Outperformed Broad High Yield in the First Quarter

Living up to their history of outperformance, fallen angel bonds (+6.54%) ended the first quarter having outperformed the broad high yield bond market (+3.25%) by 3.30%, as measured by the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index (H0FA) and BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Index (H0A0).1 Fallen angels are high yield corporate bonds that are originally issued with investment grade credit ratings.

Heavier Allocations to Basic Industry and Energy Drove Positive Results

Relative to the broad high yield bond market, fallen angels’ recent outperformance was primarily due to their higher average allocations to the basic industry and energy sectors. Both of these sectors’ bonds appreciated in the first quarter, as oil prices recovered approximately 46% since mid-February.2

Chart 1. Year-to-Date Top/Bottom Three Sector Attribution
BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index (H0FA) vs. BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Index (H0A0)

(Click to enlarge) Source: FactSet. Data as of March 31, 2016. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Top and bottom three sector attribution of the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index for fallen angels versus the BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Index for the broad high yield bond market. Figures are gross of fees, non-transaction based and therefore estimates only. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Attribution represents the opportunity cost of investment positions in a group relative to the overall benchmark.

2016 Energy Sector Bias

Over the first quarter, fallen angels’ energy allocation grew from about 13% to 25%, while the broad high yield bond market’s went from approximately 11% to 13%.3 The overweight bias occurred as a result of the energy sector’s struggles in 2015, which led to investment grade energy companies suffering credit deterioration being downgraded to high yield. Allocating to bonds that are under ratings pressure may be considered a contrarian investment approach, which has tended to work for fallen angels in the past. Fallen angels tend to price in a substantial amount of this risk ahead of the ratings downgrades and, in general, become oversold from institutional forced selling upon entering the (H0FA) index, creating a potential value proposition.

Higher Quality High Yield

Fallen angels are generally characterized by higher average credit quality than the broad high yield bond market. While fallen angel bonds currently have a higher allocation to the energy sector than the broad high yield bond market, energy fallen angels are diversified across industries and concentrated in bonds with BB-credit (below investment grade) ratings.

ANGL Ranks at Top of High Yield Bond Category

Market Vectors® Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL), which seeks to track the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index (H0FA), ranked at the top of the actively managed high yield bond category year to date and over multiple time horizons since its April 2012 inception.4

Chart 2. Performance Relative to Peer Group
Market Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) vs. Morningstar Active High Yield Bond Universe

(Click to enlarge) Source: Morningstar. Data as of March 31, 2016.
This chart is for illustrative purposes only. Index performance is not illustrative of fund performance. Fund performance current to the most recent month end is available by visiting vaneckvectors.com/etfs. Historical information is not indicative of future results. Current data may differ from data quoted. Past performance is no guarantee of future results; Market Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF commenced on April 10, 2012. An investor cannot invest directly in an index. The results assume that no cash was added to or assets withdrawn from the Index. Index returns do not represent Fund returns. The Index does not charge management fees or brokerage expenses, nor does the Index lend securities, and no revenues from securities lending were added to the performance shown. The actively managed high yield bond category is represented by the Morningstar Open End Funds – U.S. – High Yield Bond category. See index descriptions below.

About ANGL

Market Vectors® Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL), which seeks to track the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index (H0FA), ranked at the top of the actively managed high yield bond category1 year to date and over multiple time horizons since its April 2012 inception.

Market Vectors® Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF received a five-star rating from Morningstar, as of March 31, 2016. ANGL was rated against 646 funds in Morningstar’s high yield bond category over the last three years. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.5 Additional resources and information on Market Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) »

ETFs is authored by VanEck thought leaders. VanEck is the sponsor of Market Vectors ETFs and is currently among the largest providers of exchange traded funds (ETFs) in the U.S. and worldwide. Market Vectors ETFs empower investors to help build better portfolios with access to compelling investment themes and strategies. Our ETFs span many global asset classes, and are built to be transparent, liquid, and pure-play reflections of target markets.

Authored by Meredith Larson, Product Manager, ETFs

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE

1Source: FactSet. Data as of March 31, 2016. Represented by the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index (H0FA) and the BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Index (H0A0).

2Source: FactSet. Data as of March 31, 2016.

3Source: FactSet. Data from December 31, 2105 to March 31, 2016.

4Morningstar ratings: ©2016 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The peer group chart presents trailing total return percentile rankings against the Morningstar Open End Funds – U.S. – High Yield Bond category, which comprised 822 funds as of March 31, 2016.

5Morningstar ratings: ©2016 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. For each fund with at least a three-year history, Morningstar calculates a Morningstar RatingTM based on a Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return measure that accounts for variation in a fund’s monthly performance (including the effects of sales charges, loads, and redemption fees), placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance. The top 10% of funds in each category receive 5 stars, the next 22.5% receive 4 stars, the next 35% receive 3 stars, the next 22.5% receive 2 stars and the bottom 10% receive 1 star. (Each share class is counted as a fraction of one fund within this scale and rated separately, which may cause slight variations in the distribution percentages.) The Overall Morningstar Rating for a fund is derived from a weighted average of the performance figures associated with its three-, five- and ten-year (if applicable) Morningstar Rating metrics. As of March 31, 2016, ANGL was rated against 646 high yield bond funds over the last three years. ANGL received a Morningstar Rating of 5 stars for 3-year rating. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Morningstar Open End Funds – U.S. – High Yield Bond category is comprised of open-end mutual funds with an investment objective to seek returns via significant exposure to low quality bonds, those that are either unrated or rated by a major agency as BB or lower.

Morningstar ETF – U.S. – High Yield Bond category is comprised of exchange-traded funds with an investment objective to seek returns via significant exposure to low quality bonds, those that are either unrated or rated by a major agency as BB or lower.

This content is published in the United States for residents of specified countries. Investors are subject to securities and tax regulations within their applicable jurisdictions that are not addressed on this content. Nothing in this content should be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell shares of any investment in any jurisdiction where the offer or solicitation would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction, nor is it intended as investment, tax, financial, or legal advice. Investors should seek such professional advice for their particular situation and jurisdiction.

The indices listed are unmanaged indices and do not reflect the payment of transaction costs, advisory fees, or expenses that are associated with an investment in any underlying exchange-traded funds. Index performance is not illustrative of fund performance. Fund performance current to the most recent month end is available by visiting vaneck.com. Historical performance is not indicative of future results; current data may differ from data quoted. Indexes are unmanaged and are not securities in which an investment can be made.

BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index (H0FA) is a subset of the BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Index (H0A0), including securities that were rated investment grade at time of issuance. Performance and characteristics of the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index (H0FA) are quoted throughout this material. H0FA is representative of the entire fallen angel high yield corporate bond market. H0FA does not represent the performance or yield of the Market Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF.

BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Index (H0A0) is comprised of below-investment grade corporate bonds (based on an average of Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch) denominated in U.S. dollars. The country of risk of qualifying issuers must be an FX-G10 member, a Western European nation, or a territory of the U.S. or a Western European nation.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and its affiliates (”BofA Merrill Lynch”), indices, and related information, the name ”BofA Merrill Lynch,” and related trademarks, are intellectual property licensed from BofA Merrill Lynch, and may not be copied, used, or distributed without BofA Merrill Lynch’s prior written approval. The licensee’s products have not been passed on as to their legality or suitability, and are not regulated, issued, endorsed, sold, guaranteed, or promoted by BofA Merrill Lynch. BOFA MERRILL LYNCH MAKES NO WARRANTIES AND BEARS NO LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO THE INDICES, ANY RELATED INFORMATION, ITS TRADEMARKS, OR THE PRODUCT(S) (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, THEIR QUALITY, ACCURACY, SUITABILITY, AND/OR COMPLETENESS).

Fund shares are not individually redeemable and will be issued and redeemed at their Net Asset Value (NAV) only through certain authorized broker-dealers in large, specified blocks of shares called ”creation units” and otherwise can be bought and sold only through exchange trading. Creation units are issued and redeemed principally in kind. Shares may trade at a premium or discount to their NAV in the secondary market.

An investment in the Fund may be subject to risk which include, among others, credit risk, call risk, and interest rate risk, all of which may adversely affect the Fund. High yield bonds may be subject to greater risk of loss of income and principal and are likely to be more sensitive to adverse economic changes than higher rated securities. International investing involves additional risks which include greater market volatility, the availability of less reliable financial information, higher transactional and custody costs, taxation by foreign governments, decreased market liquidity and political instability. The Fund’s assets may be concentrated in a particular sector and may be subject to more risk than investments in a diverse group of sectors.

Investing involves substantial risk and high volatility, including possible loss of principal. Bonds and bond funds will generally decrease in value as interest rates rise. An investor should consider the investment objective, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. To obtain a prospectus and summary prospectus, which contains this and other information, call 800.826.2333 or visit vaneck.com/etfs. Please read the prospectus and summary prospectus carefully before investing.

Back in Black, ETF med fokus på spel stiger efter uppgradering

Back in Black, ETF med fokus på spel stiger efter uppgradering

Market Vectors Gaming ETF (NYSEArca: BJK), en ETF med fokus på spel stiger efter uppgradering av Macaus spelindustri. Analysföretaget Macquarie publicerade i förra veckan en analys som spår att den nedåtgående trenden för spelindustrin i Macau nu har bottnat ur. Under fredagen steg BJK med 2,0 procent och handlas nu 5,3 procent över sitt 200-dagars glidande medelvärde. Därmed fortsätter denna börshandlade fond den uppgång som den påbörjat under mars. BJK har nu stigit med 8,2 procent under den senaste månaden, totalt 3,9 procent sedan årets början.

Steg i fredags efter det att Macquarie Research uppgraderade Macaus casinoindustri till neutral, samtidigt som bolaget förutspår att årets bruttospelintäkter endast minskar med sex (6) procent jämfört med tidigare prognoser om en minskning med 13 procent. Det var emellertid inte endast BJK som steg, det gjorde även casinoföretagen. Wynn Resorts (NasdaqGS: Wynn) studsade upp 5,6 % i fredags på de förbättrade utsikterna. Deutsche Banks Carlo Santarelli har lämnat en köprekommenderation på Wynn, baserat på de långsiktigt positiva utsikterna. BJK har allokerat 3,6 procent av sitt kapital till WYNN och 1,2 procent till Wynn Macau. Totalt sett har denna börshandlade fond en exponering på 10,9 procent mot Kina, vilket är likställt med Macau i detta fall.

Optimistisk syn på investeringstillväxten för bostadsfastigheter

Macquarie tillskrivas sin mer optimistisk syn på investeringstillväxten för Kinas bostadsfastigheter, landets importvärdetillväxt och minskad påverkan av den anti-korruptionskampanj som tidigare lamslog marknaden.

MMPI härrör från en multipel regressionsanalys baserad på tre pelare: 1) investeringstillväxten för Kina bostadsfastigheter, 2) Kina finansiering utanför balansräkningen tillväxt och 3) Kina importvärdestillväxt säger Macquarie analytiker. Macquarie analys tyder på att den kraftiga nedgången i Macau spelindustrin äntligen kan ha bottnat.

Macquarie uppgraderas också sin riktkurs på sex Macau speloperatörer. Sands China till Outperform från tidigare neutral och Melco Crown (NasdaqGS: MPEL) fick rekommendationen neutral. Analytikerna tror också Sands China och Galaxy Entertainment kommer att gynnas av de projektförseningar som aviserats Wynn Macao och MGM Kina.

BJK har allokerat 8,2 procent av sitt kapital till Sands Kina, 2,1 procent till Melco Crown Entertainment och 7,0 procent till Galaxy Entertainment.