Time to increase allocation into emerging market equities

ETF SecuritiesTime to increase allocation into emerging market equitiesTime to increase allocation into emerging market equities

ETF Securities Asset Allocation Research – Time to increase allocation into emerging market equities

Summary

• Until recently developed market (DM) equities have been favoured over emerging market (EM) equities due to concerns over the slowdown of the Chinese economy.
• However, EM economies are recovering, investment flows are returning to emerging countries and EM equities are currently very cheap on absolute and relative values.
• Using the US dollar as a trading signal is a simple way to allocate between DM and EM equities and enhances the portfolio risk/return profile by increasing return.

Emerging market economy to rebound

The slowdown in EM equities has been driven by a combination of factors including the economic slowdown of its main constituent China, as the country is making its transition from an industry-driven economy into a service-driven economy and the slump in oil prices which affected many emerging countries such as Saudi Arabia.

Manufacturing PMIs for both DM and EM countries have been declining since early 2014. While DM PMIs remained above the 50 mark, EM PMIs fell below the 50 mark in August 2015 according to our calculations, before recovering last month.

(click to enlarge) Source: ETF Securities, Bloomberg

According to the Institute of International Finance (IIF), the year-over-year growth in foreign investment inflows into emerging countries has also been declining since May 2013 to become outflows in January and February 2016. According to market participants, EM companies have been through a period of deleveraging, repaying their foreign debt and refinancing them into local currencies. If this is the case, EM companies are getting healthier, setting the base for a potentially strong recovery. Total investment flows recovered for the first time last month, up US$3.4bn year-over-year, after 13 months of continuous decline.

(click to enlarge) Source: Institute of International Finance, ETF Securities, Bloomberg

Emerging market equities at a bargain

Our valuation analysis of DM and EM equities shows that EM equities are currently very cheap compared to DM equities as the relative, cyclically adjusted price to earnings (CAPE) currently stands at 35% below its 11 years median of 0.72.

(click to enlarge) *MSCI World index as proxy for DM equities and MSCI EM index as proxy for EM equities. Source: ETF Securities, Bloomberg

EM/DM relative CAPE has been declining since mid-2013 as EM CAPE has been falling 33% while DM CAPE has been quite flat over the same period. EM CAPE is 44% below its 11 years median, indicating that EM equities are also cheap in absolute value.

We use the MSCI world index as a proxy for DM equities and the MSCI EM index as a proxy for EM equities. While EM equities are more volatile than DM equities, EM equities have outperformed DM equities by an annualised 53% since 1988. The largest component for the EM index is China and the largest component for the DM index is the US, both accounting for 39% of their respective index.

Using USD to increase equity returns

As the benchmark currency for international trades, the US dollar (USD) is one of the key drivers of equity performance. Following the financial crisis, very accommodative monetary policy from the Fed weighed on the USD until the second half of 2014. Between the summer 2014 and the end of 2015, the USD surged 25% as the Fed reduced quantitative easing. EM equities, on the other hand, fell 23% over the same period.

In 2015, strong signs of US economic recovery led the Fed to initiate a rate tightening cycle, with the first rate hike in December last year. After a pause in the tightening cycle, we believe that the USD will appreciate as markets anticipate forthcoming rate increases but then it will depreciate again as rate hikes materialise. EM equities tend to perform well during periods of weak USD and vice-versa.

One simple and rational way to implement a relative trade strategy between EM and DM equities is to use the USD as a trading signal. In our strategy, we are using the dollar basket index (DXY) as a proxy for the USD. It measures the value of the USD against a basket of DM currencies. While the Fed’s trade-weighted USD index benchmarks the USD against a broader basket of currencies including EM currencies, we decided to use the DXY because of its stronger correlation with DM/EM relative performance.

(click to enlarge) *DXY Index as a proxy for the US dollar. Source: ETF Securities, Bloomberg

Our strategy is a momentum strategy which consists of buying DM equities when the USD has strengthened by more than 1.5% over the past 6 months and then shifting to EM equities when the USD has weakened by more than -1.5% over the past 6 months. As a result, the investment decision is not dependent on forecast data but only based on actual USD or DXY index historical returns over the past 6 months.

(click to enlarge) Source: ETF Securities, Bloomberg

Exposed to equity only, our portfolio does very little to reduce volatility, at 16.6% compared to 14.7% for the MSCI AC World, our benchmark. However, the strategy still enhances the portfolio Sharpe ratio to 0.40 from 0.08 by increasing returns by 122% compared to the MSCI AC World index.

The portfolio also outperformed both DM and EM equities on an annual basis over the same period by 119% and 43% respectively while being less volatile than EM equities. In addition, the transaction cost is expected to be very low as the number of transactions in the simulated portfolio stands at around two transactions per year on average.

(click to enlarge) *Based on daily data in USD from December 30, 1988 to March 31, 2016. Volatility and returns are annualised. Max drawdown defines as the maximum loss from a peak to a trough based on a portfolio past performance. Max recovery is the length of time in number of years to recover from the trough to previous peak. Risk free rate equals to 3.2% (Cash – a simulated combination of the IMF UK Deposit Rate and the Libor 1Yr cash yield). Source: ETF Securities, Bloomberg

After three years of negative performance, emerging markets are starting 2016 on a positive note, posting a solid 5.4% return during the first quarter of 2016 while DM equities were down – 1%. EM manufacturing PMIs for March have returned above the 50 mark indicating that emerging economies are recovering. Capital flows into EM are increasing again and our valuation analysis shows that EM equities are currently at a bargain, indicating that it is an opportune time to gain exposure or increase exposure to EM equities. With EM growth highly correlated to the USD, using the currency as a trading signal enables investors to increase their portfolio return and improve its Sharpe ratio by shifting exposure between DM and EM equities at a low implementation cost.

Important Information

General

This communication has been issued and approved for the purpose of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 by ETF Securities (UK) Limited (“ETFS UK”) which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”).

The information contained in this communication is for your general information only and is neither an offer for sale nor a solicitation of an offer to buy securities. This communication should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance and any investments may go down in value.

This document is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or any other step in furtherance of a public offering of shares or securities in the United States or any province or territory thereof. Neither this document nor any copy hereof should be taken, transmitted or distributed (directly or indirectly) into the United States.

This communication may contain independent market commentary prepared by ETFS UK based on publicly available information. Although ETFS UK endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the content in this communication, ETFS UK does not warrant or guarantee its accuracy or correctness. Any third party data providers used to source the information in this communication make no warranties or representation of any kind relating to such data. Where ETFS UK has expressed its own opinions related to product or market activity, these views may change. Neither ETFS UK, nor any affiliate, nor any of their respective officers, directors, partners, or employees accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication or its contents. ETFS UK is required by the FCA to clarify that it is not acting for you in any way in relation to the investment or investment activity to which this communication relates. In particular,

ETFS UK will not provide any investment services to you and or advise you on the merits of, or make any recommendation to you in relation to, the terms of any transaction. No representative of ETFS UK is authorised to behave in any way which would lead you to believe otherwise. ETFS UK is not, therefore, responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients and you should seek your own independent legal, investment and tax or other advice as you see fit.

New Chinese FX reforms prompts caution across asset classes

New Chinese FX reforms prompts caution across asset classes

ETFS Multi-Asset Weekly – New Chinese FX reforms prompts caution across asset classes

Download the complete report (.pdf)

Highlights


•    Precious metals rally as industrial commodities slide on negative Chinese sentiment.
•    European stocks sell-off as China reforms hit luxury goods and auto sectors.
•    Chinese Renminbi devalued by nearly 5% as new reforms implemented.

The decision by the Peoples Bank of China (PBOC) to devalue its currency by a cumulative 5% last week, the most on record, and to change its fixing methodology for CNY caused a negative reaction across asset classes. Investors became more defensive, reducing positions in cyclical assets. Commodity sectors exposed to China, like energy and industrial metals, saw prices slide in a knee-jerk reaction as a result. USD weakness helped commodity markets rebound, as expectations of an interest rate hike began to be pushed further back in 2015. Many commodity prices initially declined by more than the change in the CNY/USD rate, indicating a sentiment driven change rather than a fundamental one.

Commodities

Precious metals rally as industrial commodities slide on negative Chinese sentiment. WTI and Brent crude oil benchmarks fell 5.47% and 2.47%, respectively reaching the lowest level in over six years, with the devaluation of the CNY thought by many investors to be a signal of declining future demand. Significant negative sentiment over the outlook for Chinese economic growth appears to be priced in to a range of commodity markets, particularly energy and industrial metals sectors. We expect the commodity price weakness to largely transitory many prices initially declining by more (in USD terms) than the devaluation of the CNY/USD rate, indicating a sentiment driven change rather than a fundamental one. Gold and silver were the largest beneficiaries of the China FX decision, as some risk aversion took hold as investor sentiment waned.

Equities

European stocks sell-off as China reforms hit luxury goods and auto sectors. European equity benchmarks posted losses early in the trading week, in line with other major global bourses, as investors digested the potentially negative implications of a weaker Renminbi for the Chinese economy. Sectors like materials, luxury goods and autos were some of the worst affected. The surprisingly weaker Q2 GDP numbers from Germany and France also adversely affected investor sentiment. In contrast, the Chinese sharemarkets didn’t overreact to the news as many other bourses did, posting gains for the week, despite weaker-than expected numbers on industrial production and retail sales.

Currencies

Chinese Renminbi devalued by nearly 5% as new reforms implemented. The significant policy change was to set the new Renminbi fixing rate at the previous day’s closing spot CNY rate. The PBOC’s move allows greater exchange rate flexibility and transparency of CNY pricing in its ongoing reform of the Renminbi and was not intended to be a ‘currency war’. We feel it shows progress towards a more market determined rate and is beneficial for its IMF SDR aspirations despite the IMF noting that the Chinese policy change has ‘no direct implications’ for its SDR review. Both the AUD and NZD lost ground on the markets expectations of more expensive exports to China crimping demand. Further softness from these two currencies is expected, with their respective central banks maintaining their easing biases. Meanwhile, the Swedish Krone was the strongest G10 performing G10 currency, after CPI numbers surprised to the upside which could keep the Riksbank from cutting rates at its next meeting.

For more information contact:

ETF Securities Research team
ETF Securities (UK) Limited
T +44 (0) 207 448 4336
E  info@etfsecurities.com

Important Information

General

This communication has been issued and approved for the purpose of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 by ETF Securities (UK) Limited (”ETFS UK”) which is authorised and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (”FCA”).

Investments may go up or down in value and you may lose some or all of the amount invested.  Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. You should consult an independent investment adviser prior to making any investment in order to determine its suitability to your circumstances.

The information contained in this communication is for your general information only and is neither an offer for sale nor a solicitation of an offer to buy securities. This communication should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. Historical performance is not an indication of future performance and any investments may go down in value.

This communication may contain independent market commentary prepared by ETFS UK based on publicly available information. Although ETFS UK endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the content in this communication, ETFS UK does not warrant or guarantee its accuracy or correctness. Any third party data providers used to source the information in this communication make no warranties or representation of any kind relating to such data. Where ETFS UK has expressed its own opinions related to product or market activity, these views may change. Neither ETFS UK, nor any affiliate, nor any of their respective, officers, directors, partners, or employees accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this publication or its contents.

ETFS UK is required by the FSA to clarify that it is not acting for you in any way in relation to the investment or investment activity to which this communication relates. In particular, ETFS UK will not provide any investment services to you and or advise you on the merits of, or make any recommendation to you in relation to, the terms of any transaction.  No representative of ETFS UK is authorised to behave in any way which would lead you to believe otherwise. ETFS UK is not, therefore, responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients and you should seek your own independent legal, investment and tax or other advice as you see fit.

This document is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, an advertisement or any other step in furtherance of a public offering of shares or securities in the United States or any province or territory thereof. Neither this document nor any copy hereof should be taken, transmitted or distributed (directly or indirectly) into the United States.

Other than as set out above, investors may contact ETFS UK at +44 (0)20 7448 4330 or at retail@etfsecurities.com to obtain copies of prospectuses and related regulatory documentation, including annual reports. Other than as separately indicated, this communication is being made on a ”private placement” basis and is intended solely for the professional / institutional recipient to which it is delivered.

Third Parties

Securities issued by each of the Issuers are direct, limited recourse obligations of the relevant Issuer alone and are not obligations of or guaranteed by any of UBS AG, Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc. (”MLCI”), Bank of America Corporation (”BAC) or any of their affiliates. UBS AG, MLCI and BAC, Shell Trading Switzerland, Shell Treasury, HSBC Bank USA N.A., JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Deutsche Bank AG any of their affiliates or anyone else or any of their affiliates. Each of UBS AG, Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc. (”MLCI”), Bank of America Corporation (”BAC) or any of their affiliates. UBS AG, MLCI and BAC, Shell Trading Switzerland, Shell Treasury, HSBC Bank USA N.A., JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Deutsche Bank AG disclaims all and any liability whether arising in tort, contract or otherwise (save as referred to above) which it might have in respect of this document or its contents otherwise arising in connection herewith.

”Dow Jones,” ”UBS”, DJ-UBS CISM,”, ”DJ-UBS CI-F3SM,” and any related indices or sub-indices are service marks of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (”Dow Jones”), CME Group Index Services LLC (”CME Indexes”), UBS AG (”UBS”) or UBS Securities LLC (”UBS Securities”), as the case may be, and have been licensed for use by the Issuer. The securities issued by CSL although based on components of the Dow Jones UBS Commodity Index 3 month ForwardSM are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Dow Jones, CME Indexes, UBS, UBS Securities or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates, and none of Dow Jones, CME Indexes, UBS, UBS Securities, or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates, makes any representation regarding the advisability of investing in such product.