Fundamentals Return to Emerging Markets

Fundamentals Return to Emerging Markets Van EckFundamentals Return to Emerging Markets

Fundamentals Return to Emerging Markets. This past quarter has been one of more twists and turns in macro factors than we can, perhaps, remember. Commodities went from being some of the worst performing and under-held assets in January to the complete opposite in February and March. The Federal Reserve has ”walked back” from its previous more hawkish interest rate projections and, as a result, the U.S. dollar declined dramatically. This has taken the pressure off some of the weaker emerging markets currencies, which have seen impressive rallies. It appears that many emerging markets investors have rushed to sell popular investments in India and China to return to more globally cyclical driven markets, companies that have benefited from the rebound in commodities, and higher beta currencies. This caused significant performance idiosyncrasies among countries in the emerging markets complex in the first quarter.

1Q 2016 EM Equity Strategy Review and Positioning

We believe long-term followers of our strategy will understand that panic followed by euphoria rarely provides a favorable backdrop for outperformance by our highly disciplined all-cap strategy, as both size and growth characteristics tend to be penalized in short periods of panic. Poor quality and cyclical factors, which our strategy generally avoids, tend to outperform everything in the first innings of euphoria. It is important to point out that the cause of our potential underperformance during these short periods is often due to what we do not own (i.e., what we deem to be very large, poor quality cyclical companies) as much as it is indicative of what we do own — you might think of it as partial giveback of our previous outperformance.

Financials and Consumer Staples Provide Boost; Industrials and Tech Detract

During the first quarter of 2016, stock selection in financials and consumer staples aided performance relative to the MSCI Emerging Markets Index1 benchmark, while selection in industrials and information technology detracted. The absence of allocations to the energy and materials sectors also hurt the strategy’s relative performance.

On a country level, China was the main detractor from performance followed by Russia and India. Peru, the Philippines, and Colombia gave the strategy’s relative performance a boost.

1Q Top Performers

The top five performing companies in the strategy came from around the globe. BB Seguridade Participacoes SA2, the insurance arm of Banco do Brasil, the largest Latin America-based bank, as a Brazilian real holding, was helped significantly by the rebound in the Brazilian market during the quarter. It’s a structural growth story. The company continues to display strong execution, in line with our growth thesis. In addition to its improving asset quality, consistent performance, and asset growth, Peruvian financial holding company Credicorp3 benefited from the turnaround in the Peruvian market. This followed the second half of 2015 when uncertainty as to whether the country would be reclassified by MSCI indexers weighed heavily on its stocks. Yes Bank4, a high-quality, private sector Indian bank, benefited from both improving loan growth and widening lending spreads. These have resulted in significant results, as has the bank’s focus on retail, as opposed to commercial, business opportunities. The stock price of Robinsons Retail Holdings5, the Philippines’ second largest multi-format retailer, made up most of its decline from the last quarter after full-year 2015 results came in largely in line with consensus, backing up our growth thesis. Although a global leader and structural growth story in its own right, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company6, the undisputed global leader in integrated circuit (IC) manufacturing, also benefitted from cyclical factors in the first quarter. There were earnings upgrades driven by greater short-term visibility and asset utilization from improved traction with key customers. Additionally, there was a multiple lift as investors also favored businesses that benefited from global cyclical tailwinds.

Chinese Stocks Suffer in 2016

Given that Chinese stocks suffered during the quarter, it is perhaps not surprising that four of the five biggest detractors from our strategy’s performance were Chinese. Following a slight change in its business model, Chinese company Boer Power Holdings7, which provides electrical distribution solutions, is facing, in our opinion, increased business risk. The company’s leverage increased as it took on higher levels of accounts receivable. We continue to believe, however, that the company will continue to be a beneficiary of the development of a smarter grid in China. Luxoft Holding8 is a high-end information technology services provider, primarily to the financial services industry, with its programmers largely situated in the ex-Soviet Union countries, which are referred to as Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). During the quarter, the company reported lower than expected numbers, largely related to the pulling of a key contract by a client. Chinese company Wasion Group Holdings9, like Boer Power Holdings, is in the business of improving the efficiency of power use, an area of activity we still believe displays convincing fundamentals. The company is setting the standard for ”smart” electrical grid meters in the country. During the quarter, however, it suffered from the fallout created by the adjustment and lengthening of payment timelines on certain government contracts. Along with a number of others, JD.com10, one of the Fund’s internet holdings, suffered from the widespread exit from the Chinese market during the quarter, giving back some of its outperformance of the previous year. However, the company continues to reflect, in our opinion, the considerable strength of the growth opportunities in the e-commerce sector in China. CAR Inc11 is the largest auto rental company in China and provides vehicles to U-Car, a partner providing ”Uber-like” chauffeured car services in China. The issues around this company, and its recent poor performance, center on uncertainty surrounding the regulatory environment that has led U-Car to scale back its investment, and thus use fewer CAR Inc vehicles. We are monitoring this situation closely.

We Don’t Respond to Short-Term Macro Events

As we always strive to emphasize, we are fundamentally a bottom-up strategy, first and foremost. However, we do like to give a sense of where the strategy is positioned in terms of country and sector. Please bear in mind that a higher weighting in a country may not necessarily mean extra exposure to that country’s risk, as certain holdings may be negatively correlated to the local currency or positively correlated to local rates.

Because we don’t respond to shorter-term macro events such as oil and Brazilian politics, our weightings do not tend to move as materially as those of many of our peers. We simply don’t speculate on short-term movements or cyclical factors — we invest in well-researched, long-term structural growth businesses at attractive valuations. We maintain that this process and philosophy have historically returned and, we hope, may continue to return, what we consider pleasing long-term performance. However, our long-term performance may be punctuated by short periods when the asset class underperforms for mostly technical reasons.

We continue to be overweight in China, India, and Brazil, while still significantly underweight in South Korea. Taiwan still has a relatively light weighting, although it is home to a couple of our larger positions. South Africa is still also underweight, but less so than in prior years, as weakness in the rand has encouraged us to make further investment in domestically-oriented companies, while outperformance of Naspers12 has also increased our weighting in the country.

Healthcare and Financials Offer Structural Growth Opportunities

By sector, we have maintained the persistent biases that you can expect from our philosophy of structural growth at a reasonable price. Energy and materials are very difficult places for us to find good, persistent growth, while much of the telecommunication and utility sectors are not showing us much growth at all. Consumer staples, a natural area to look for structural growth, has largely proven to be too expensive for our taste in the last few years, and this remains the case.

We remain overweight in healthcare, clearly a long run structural growth industry as consumers in emerging markets dedicate a higher percentage of their increasing disposable income to healthcare spending. Financials remain a large weighting for the strategy, but the investments we choose in this sector are very specific, usually by country, and focus on persistent structural trends such as microfinance, ”banking the unbanked” and specialty insurance.

Emerging Markets Outlook

Experience informs us that this kind of environment rarely persists for more than a quarter or two before rational fundamentals reassert themselves and investments in quality companies with genuinely sustainable operating profitability and attractive valuations reassert their leadership. In a more ”normal” environment, our strategy has historically tended to do quite well in our estimation.

Eyeing Brazil with Interest

We are watching Brazil with great interest. The political situation there remains extremely fluid. The incumbent socialist administration looks increasingly likely to be replaced by a more market friendly, reformist coalition. This expectation has resulted in a sharp recovery in current share prices and the country’s currency. We steadily increased positions throughout last year because valuations became more and more attractive and have been somewhat rewarded for this — only somewhat, because the rebound has been led, so far, by large-cap commodity names such as Petrobras and Vale14, which do not align with our structural growth at a reasonable price (SGARP) philosophy and process.

Lower But Better Growth in China

China began the year with very negative headlines centering on the likelihood of a sharp depreciation of its currency and fears of an imminent debt-fueled crisis. We, on the other hand, continue to expect lower but better growth, monetary and fiscal easing, and a gradually weakening renminbi, but no crisis. Our base case is for modest cyclical recovery in China’s economy in the first half of 2016 that could allow more room for further significant structural reforms, with more emphasis on the supply-side of the economy, rather than attempts simply to ”juice up” demand. We do believe, however, that more credit ”issues” are likely as the tidying up of highly indebted, state owned entities continues. As we regularly remind emerging markets investors, our strategy has very little exposure to the old, smokestack/state-owned enterprise (SOE) complex13, and we continue to favor long-term, structural growth opportunities in environmental services, internet, healthcare, tourism, and insurance.

Performance Led by Technicals in India

India was the other market where we experienced some negative performance over the quarter. Again, we would make the case that this was partly for technical reasons related to positioning. We remain optimistic about the Indian companies in which the strategy is currently invested, despite the country falling out of favor in relative terms.

Accelerating Growth in Peru

After several months facing a challenging scenario with lower commodity prices, the outlook for Peru started to improve. Growth in the country has been accelerating, driven by the mining and infrastructure sector. There is uncertainty regarding the outcome of the presidential election. It seems that the most likely scenario is that former-president Alberto Fujimori will win in the second round. Finally, there seems to be a consensus view that Peru has a big chance of avoiding MSCI reclassification to Frontier Market which could act as an additional driver to Peruvian equities.

Can Colombia Tough Out Low Oil Prices?

Colombia continues to be negatively affected by the low level of oil prices, the uncertain fiscal adjustment, and expectations for the peace process. In our view, the government needs to approve a fiscal reform in order to address some important topics that will allow the country to achieve its fiscal target amid lower prices and low level of reserves. The government is waiting for the completion of the peace process to have the necessary political capital to proceed with an honest fiscal reform (this will be decisive to preserve the sovereign rating). There will likely be some slowdown in activity in 2016 with GDP growth expectations of around 2.7% versus 3.1% in 2015. There are some factors such as the beginning of the 4G mobile technology infrastructure program and the positive reaction of some tradeable sectors to a higher exchange rate that should partially offset the tough scenario for the economy given currently low oil prices.

We Believe Structural Growth is Reliable and Sustainable

In general, we see valuations for our focus list companies, after the recent rally, as fair, without being materially cheap. As we noted at the end of 2015, we are now seeing, as expected, some better economic numbers out of China, which is a notable bright spot. In addition, we would also point out that the growth of our strategy has been structural in nature and, arguably, quite reliable; as such, we expect it to compound over the course of time, with little cyclical risk associated with the world and market volatility we live with today.

Emerging Markets Equity

April 18, 2016

by David Semple, Portfolio Manager

Semple is a veteran of emerging markets (EM) investing, and has more than 25 years of experience.  Uniquely informed by having lived and worked in several emerging markets, Semple’s EM expertise includes successfully establishing investment processes and frameworks, leading teams of analysts, and marketing to a global investor base.

Post Disclosure

1 The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) Emerging Markets Index captures large and mid cap representation across 23 Emerging Markets (EM) countries. With 836 constituents, the index covers approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in each country. This index is unmanaged and does not reflect the payment of transaction costs, advisory fees or expenses that are associated with an investment in specific investment Fund. An index’s performance is not illustrative of a Fund’s performance. Indices are not securities in which investments can be made.

For a complete listing of the holdings in Van Eck Emerging Markets Fund (the ”Fund”) as of 3/31/16, please click on this PDF. Please note that these are not recommendations to buy or sell any security.

2 BB Seguridade Participacoes SA represented 3.2% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
3 Credicorp represented 2.4% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
4 Yes Bank represented 2.4% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
5 Robinsons Retail Holdings represented 2.2% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
6 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company represented 2.5% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
7 Boer Power Holdings represented 0.6% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
8 Luxoft Holdings represented 1.6% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
9 Wasion Group Holdings represented 0.7% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
10 JD.com represented 3.1% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
11 CAR Inc represented 1.5% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
12 Naspers represented 3.4% of the Fund’s net assets as of 3/31/16.
13 State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) is a legal entity created by a government with the purpose to partake in commercial activities on the government’s behalf.
14Petrobras and Vale were not held by the Fund as of 3/31/16.

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE

This content is published in the United States for residents of specified countries. Investors are subject to securities and tax regulations within their applicable jurisdictions that are not addressed on this content. Nothing in this content should be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell shares of any investment in any jurisdiction where the offer or solicitation would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction, nor is it intended as investment, tax, financial, or legal advice. Investors should seek such professional advice for their particular situation and jurisdiction.

The views and opinions expressed are those of the speakers and are current as of the posting date. Videos and commentaries are general in nature and should not be construed as investment advice. Opinions are subject to change with market conditions. All performance information is historical and is not a guarantee of future results.

Please note that Van Eck Securities Corporation offers investment portfolios that invest in the asset class(es) mentioned in this commentary. The Emerging Markets Equity strategy is subject to the risks associated with its investments in emerging markets securities, which tend to be more volatile and less liquid than securities traded in developed countries. The Emerging Markets Equity strategy’s investments in foreign securities involve risks related to adverse political and economic developments unique to a country or a region, currency fluctuations or controls, and the possibility of arbitrary action by foreign governments, including the takeover of property without adequate compensation or imposition of prohibitive taxation. The Emerging Markets Equity strategy is subject to risks associated with investments in derivatives, illiquid securities, and small or mid-cap companies. The Emerging Markets Equity strategy is also subject to inflation risk, market risk, non-diversification risk, and leverage risk. Please see the prospectus and summary prospectus for information on these and other risk considerations.

You can obtain more specific information on VanEck strategies by visiting Investment Strategies.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. An investor should consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of any investment strategy carefully before investing. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Van Eck Securities Corporation.

China Developments Lead Recent Tailwinds

China Developments Lead Recent Tailwinds

  • Capital outflows and currency stabilization in China help the overall emerging markets (EM) environment
  • Headwinds including leverage in China, fiscal deterioration, and European issues remain prevalent
  • Liquidity, defensive positioning and unconstrained approach remain crucial in periods of uncertainty

Market Overview

The market environment remains unsettled. The quality of the macro flow in major economies is still very uneven (despite a larger number of positive macro surprises in both developed G10 and EM) and many central banks find themselves in a policy quagmire where additional monetary easing results in stronger currencies and higher interest rates. Markets – no doubt “inspired” by Janet Yellen’s end-of-March speech – continue to price in a very dovish scenario for the Federal Reserve (Fed) that envisages only two full policy rate hikes in the next three years. A big increase in neutral investor positioning (as measured, for example, by the American Association of Individual Investors) in past weeks is a reflection of these uncertainties which, in turn, is a byproduct of tensions between serious macro/policy headwinds and tailwinds. The “tailwinds” cluster includes a more sanguine near-term outlook for China, tentative signs that EM growth might be bottoming out, and reasonably strong external accounts in many EMs. On the “headwinds” side of the equation, we find multiple unresolved issues in Europe, major imbalances in China (possibly made worse by the recent policy moves), a Fed struggling with forward guidance, a massive widening of the EM fiscal gap, and deteriorating corporate profitability.

Portfolio Review

We believe that the recent tailwinds are likely to dominate for the near term. It looks like Chinese authorities have managed to slow down capital outflows through official channels. The decline in international reserves is now smaller than in November-December 2015. Authorities are also implementing additional measures to support growth, mainly through additional credit supply. Possible fiscal stimulus might prop up GDP growth as well. These factors should reduce the immediate depreciation pressure on the renminbi (CNY) and authorities should be able to maintain the existing exchange rate regime for a little longer, alleviating concerns about the impact of CNY devaluation on other emerging market currencies (especially in Asia). Additional EM foreign exchange (FX) strength is a benefit to the inflation outlook and in this environment, the Fed’s dovish policy stance might provide EM central banks with more room to ease, which could facilitate a cycle of stronger currencies, lower inflation, lower interest rates and a better growth outlook. There are already tentative signs (better macro surprises and higher PMIs) that the growth outlook in EM might be improving. Consensus forecasts for 2016 quarterly GDP growth in EM have also been edging up since mid-March and additional policy support might prove crucial for further progress. Lower inflation can further boost real interest rates in EM, which already look attractive relative to the past lows and relative to U.S. Treasuries (UST). An important, although temporary, aspect of China’s current policy mix is its positive impact on the housing market and, as such, on global commodity prices, especially metals, which should provide additional support to EM FX and external balances.

However, persistent headwinds abound. Our key concern is that China’s near-term growth/FX relief might come at the price of worsening imbalances, which will likely make any future resolution more problematic. Specifically, the leverage context remains highly worrisome as authorities intend to accelerate M2 money supply (includes cash, checking and savings deposits, money market mutual funds) growth. The same applies to a very high bank assets/nominal GDP ratio (especially when compared to China’s still relatively low per capita GDP). The success of China’s credit boost is questionable given that it now takes four extra units of credit (measured by Total Social Financing, a figure the Chinese government created to track all the money in its system) to produce one extra unit of nominal GDP. Despite the recent small improvements, both China’s growth slowdown and the decline in international reserves are of historic proportions and the reserve adequacy now looks stretched on several metrics. So, while we acknowledge the recent positive signals coming from China, our longer-term view on China’s economic, policy and, political challenges remains unchanged.

Another set of concerns relates to the recent fiscal deterioration in EM and rating downgrades it might entail. After several years of stability (2010-2014), the aggregate EM fiscal gap widened sharply in 2015, reaching 3.7% of GDP – the worst in the past 15 years – and consensus expects further deterioration to 4% of GDP in 2016. We doubt that rating agencies will respond kindly to the deterioration and we expect further rating/outlook downgrades.

Our third set of concerns centers on unresolved European issues. The potential for Greece to leave the eurozone (“Grexit”) is resurfacing again and will keep on reappearing unless there are more radical steps to help reduce the debt burden. The immigration/refugee issue looks thoroughly mishandled and we should expect further instances of political extremism. The situation in the banking sector appears murky at best and bank credit default swap spreads started to widen again after a brief post-European Central Bank (ECB) respite in early March. There is also growing evidence that negative interest rates are punishing banks. Finally, corporate profitability is deteriorating and capex spending remains high relative to cash flow from operations.

The portfolio implications of these developments are as follows: (1) be nimble and liquid (and the unconstrained approach is more important than ever); (2) be aware of the headwinds that we view as resurgent and have a reaction function (ours is when China’s property market stalls again and/or the Fed hikes); (3) respect tailwinds in downturns – big and long rallies often happen when things are bad.

Specifically, we maintain our defensive positions (approximately 40% of the portfolio) in hard-currency bonds with spread/beta positions (i.e., Argentina and Brazil) and/or with defensive characteristics (i.e., South Korea). We also maintain selective exposure to local-currency denominated bonds (approximately 50% of the portfolio). We focus on countries with high real interest rates, where central banks that are not afraid to tighten if necessary and whose currencies were allowed to depreciate during the past risk-off episodes (i.e., Mexico, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brazil). Finally, we have exposure to selective EM corporates (about 10% of our portfolio) with a focus on liquid companies that demonstrate low-beta to the economy and that can benefit from FX weakness through local-currency costs.

Exposure Types and Significant ChangesThe changes to our top positions are summarized below. Our largest positions are currently: Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Peru, and South Africa.

  • We added local-currency sovereign exposure in Indonesia and Peru to potentially benefit from the uptick in commodity prices and lower than expected inflation that allowed the Bank of Indonesia to cut and the central bank of Peru to hold. We also expect to benefit from changes in Indonesia’s regulatory environment that should boost local demand for government bonds.
  • We also added local-currency exposure to Brazil where impeachment sentiment is rapidly gaining momentum and inflation appears to be topping off. We also increased local exposure in Mexico and Malaysia where inflation remains under control.
  • We reduced hard-currency sovereign exposure in South Korea and Israel – low beta bonds that have performed well but have been reduced to reallocate to more compelling opportunities.
  • We also reduced hard-currency sovereign exposure in the Philippines, Chile, and Hungary (where Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s fight with the EU has intensified lately).

Fund Performance

  • The Fund (EMBAX) gained 3.27% in March, compared to a 6.16% gain for a 50% local-50% hard-currency index.The Fund’s biggest winners were Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, and Peru. The Fund’s biggest losers were Israel, South Korea, and Indonesia.
  • Turning to the market’s performance, the GBI-EM’s biggest winners were Russia, Colombia, and South Africa. The biggest losers were Nigeria, China, and Thailand.
  • The EMBI’s biggest winners were Ecuador, Mongolia, and Zambia, while its biggest losers were Serbia, Poland, and Romania.

Manager Commentary

By: Eric Fine, Portfolio Manager

Please note that the information herein represents the opinion of the portfolio manager and these opinions may change at any time and from time to time.

Diversification does not assure a profit or prevent against a loss.

Expenses: Class A: Gross 1.32%; Net 1.25%. Expenses are capped contractually until 05/01/16 at 1.25% for Class A. Caps exclude certain expenses, such as interest. Please note that, generally, unconstrained bond funds may have higher fees than core bond funds due to the specialized nature of their strategies. The tables above present past performance which is no guarantee of future results and which may be lower or higher than current performance. Returns reflect applicable fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. Had the Fund incurred all expenses and fees, investment returns would have been reduced. Investment returns and Fund share values will fluctuate so that investors’ shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Fund returns assume that dividends and capital gains distributions have been reinvested in the Fund at Net Asset Value (NAV). Index returns assume that dividends of the index constituents have been reinvested. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal; please see disclaimers on next page. Please call 800.826.2333 or visit vaneck.com for performance current to the most recent month ended.

Data Sources: VanEck Research, FactSet. All portfolio weightings and statements herein as of March 31, 2016. Unless otherwise indicated.

Duration measures a bond’s sensitivity to interest rate changes that reflects the change in a bond’s price given a change in yield. This duration measure is appropriate for bonds with embedded options. Quantitative Easing by a central bank increases the money supply engaging in open market operations in an effort to promote increased lending and liquidity. Monetary Easing is an economic tool employed by a central bank to reduce interest rates and increase money supply in an effort to stimulate economic activity. Correlation is a statistical measure of how two variables move in relation to one other. Liquidity Illusion refers to the effect that an independent variable might have in the liquidity of a security as such variable fluctuates overtime. A Holdouts Issue in the fixed income asset class occurs when a bond issuing country or entity is in default or at the brink of default, and launches an exchange offer in an attempt to restructure its debt held by existing bond holding investors.

Emerging Markets Hard Currency Bonds refers to bonds denominated in currencies that are generally widely accepted around the world (such as the U.S.-Dollar, Euro or Yen). Emerging Markets Local Currency Bonds are bonds denominated in the local currency of the issuer. Emerging Markets Sovereign Bonds are bonds issued by national governments of emerging countries in order to finance a country’s growth. Emerging Markets Quasi-Sovereign Bonds are bonds issued by corporations domiciled in emerging countries that are either 100% government owned or whose debts are 100% government guaranteed. Emerging Markets Corporate Bonds are bonds issued by non-government owned corporations that are domiciled in emerging countries. A Supranational is an international organization, or union, whose members transcend national boundaries and share in the decision-making. Examples of supranationals are: World Bank, IMF, World Trade Organization. The European Central Bank (ECB) is the central bank for the euro and administers monetary policy of the Eurozone, which consists of 19 EU member states and is one of the largest currency areas in the world. The Labor Market Conditions Index (LMCI) is a dynamic factor model index that combines 19 labor market indicators to provide an assessment of overall labor market conditions. The Employment Cost Index tracks the changes in the costs of labor for businesses in the United States economy.

All indices are unmanaged and include the reinvestment of all dividends, but do not reflect the payment of transaction costs, advisory fees or expenses that are associated with an investment in the Fund. An index’s performance is not illustrative of the Fund’s performance. Indices are not securities in which investments can be made. The 50/50 benchmark (the “Index”) is a blended index consisting of 50% J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index (EMBI) Global Diversified and 50% J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index-Emerging Markets Global Diversified (GBI-EM). The J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index-Emerging Markets Global Diversified (GBI-EM) tracks local currency bonds issued by Emerging Markets governments. The index spans over 15 countries. J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index (EMBI) Global Diversified tracks returns for actively traded external debt instruments in emerging markets, and is also J.P. Morgan’s most liquid U.S-dollar emerging markets debt benchmark. The J.P. Morgan Emerging Country Currency Index (EMCI) is a tradable benchmark for emerging markets currencies versus the U.S. Dollar (USD). The Index compromises 10 currencies: BRL, CLP, CNH, HUF, INR, MXN, RUB, SGD, TRY and ZAR. The Consumer Confidence Index (CCI) is an indicator designed to measure consumer confidence, which is defined as the degree of optimism on the state of the economy that consumers are expressing through their activities of savings and spending.

Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but J.P. Morgan does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. The Index is used with permission. The index may not be copied, used or distributed without J.P. Morgan’s written approval. Copyright 2014, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.

Please note that the information herein represents the opinion of the portfolio manager and these opinions may change at any time and from time to time and portfolio managers of other investment strategies may take an opposite opinion than those stated herein. Not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. Current market conditions may not continue. Non-VanEck proprietary information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. No part of this aterial may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of Van Eck Securities Corporation ©2016 VanEck.

Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. You can lose money by investing in the Fund. Any investment in the Fund should be part of an overall investment program, not a complete program. The Fund is subject to risks associated with its investments in emerging markets securities. Investing in foreign denominated and/or domiciled securities may involve heightened risk due to currency fluctua-tions, and economic and political risks, which may be enhanced in emerging markets. As the Fund may invest in securities denominated in foreign currencies and some of the income received by the Fund will be in foreign currencies, changes in currency exchange rates may negatively impact the Fund’s return. Derivatives may involve certain costs and risks such as liquidity, interest rate, market, credit, management and the risk that a position could not be closed when most advantageous. The Fund may also be subject to credit risk, in¬terest rate risk, sovereign debt risk, tax risk, non-diversification risk and risks associated with non-investment grade securities. Please see the prospectus and summary prospectus for information on these and other risk considerations.

Investors should consider the Fund’s investment objective, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing. Bond and bond funds will decrease in value as interest rates rise. The prospectus and summary prospectus contain this as well as other information. Please read them carefully before investing. Please call 800.826.2333 or visit vaneck.com for performance information current to the most recent month end and for a free prospectus and summary prospectus.

En börshandlad fond i denna region förbises

En börshandlad fond i denna region förbises

En börshandlad fond i denna region förbises Aktierna i Latinamerika och de börshandlade fonder som replikerar utvecklingen av dessa länders aktiemarknader har utvecklats väl under 2016. Tillväxtmarknadernas eftersläntrare har blivit vinnare på de stigande råvarupriserna. Trots detta har en börshandlad fond i denna region förbises när allt fler investerare gett länder som Brasilien, Latinamerika största ekonomi, förnyad uppmärksamhet.

Trots att iShares MSCI All Peru Capped ETF (NYSEArca: EPU), den landsspecifika börshandlade fonden som replikerar utvecklingen av aktiemarknaden i Lima, Perus huvudstad, har stigit med mer än 26 procent sedan starten 2016 är denna ETF fortfarande att betrakta som förbisedd.

EPU speglar Perus ekonomi väl, och landets roll som en stor producent av metaller som guld, silver och koppar. Denna börshandlade fond har allokerat 46,4 procent av sitt kapital till materialsektorn, och 30,1 procent till finanssektorn. Ingen annan sektor har en vikt som överstiger 8,8 procent av denna ETFs kapital.

EPU har utvecklats väl trots att denna ETF har haft lägre guld- och silverpriser att kämpa mot, men det har också varit många frågetecken kring Perus marknadsklassificering som skapat oro bland investerarna. Indexleverantör MSCI hade tidigare varnat för att Peru var i riskzonen att förlora sin tillväxtmarknadsstatus och att degraderas till den beteckning frontier market, eller gränsmarknad. MSCI har emellertid bekräftat att Peru får behålla sin tillväxtmarknadsstatus.

MSCI varnade tidigare i mitten av augusti 2015 att Peru skulle kunna nedgraderas till frontier market eftersom endast tre värdepapper från landet hade uppfyllt storlek och likviditetskrav för tillväxtmarknadsstatus. För de investerare som söker exponering mot den peruanska aktiemarknaden är EPU i allmänhet det bästa valet eftersom peruanska aktier har en mycket låg vikt bland de traditionella tillväxtmarknadsindexen.

Peru tillhör de länder som brukar betraktas som ”förlorade”, och därmed utgör de minsta fiskarna i den stora aktiemarknadsdammen. Övriga länder i denna kategori är till exempel Grekland, Irland och Israel. Ingen av dessa ekonomier tillhör dem som i allmänhet återfinns i den genomsnittliga aktieportföljen. Trots detta har EPU mer än 166 MUSD under förvaltning varav 28 MUSD i form av kontanter. Perus centralbank har redan höjt landets räntorna och förväntas göra så flera gånger i år, men marknadsbedömare ser detta som positivt.

Högre räntor och stigande råvarupriser gynnar Peru

Högre räntor och stigande råvarupriser gynnar Peru

Högre räntor och stigande råvarupriser gynnar Peru Äntligen goda nyheter för de latinamerikanska aktiemarknaderna, och därmed också de börshandlade fonder som följer dessa aktiemarknader. iShares MSCI All Peru Capped ETF (NYSEArca: EPU) steg kraftigt när landets centralbank höjde räntan. Högre räntor och stigande råvarupriser gynnar Peru och vi har sett stigande ädelmetallpriser på senare tid.

EPU speglar Perus status som en stor producent av ädelmetaller som guld och silver, men också av koppar. Denna börshandlade fond har allokerat 46,4 procent av sitt kapital till råvarusektorn, och 30,1 procent till finanssektorn. Ingen annan sektor har en vikt som överstiger 8,8 procent av kapitalet i denna ETF.

Tredje räntehöjningen i rad

Perus centralbank höjde nyligen räntan med 25 punkter till 4,25 procent, vilket är den tredje månatliga höjningen i rad. Samtidigt ser vi hur de stigande elpriserna bidragit till att inflationen nått den högsta nivån, 4,6 procent, på fyra år. Under januari låg den peruanska inflationen på 4,4 procent.

De stigande kurserna för denna landspecifika börshandlade fond som oss veterligen är den enda ETF som följer den peruanska aktiemarknaden, kom endast några månader efter det att Peru hotats av en nedgradering från emerging market till frontier market. Indexleverantör MSCI hade tidigare varnat för att Peru var i fara att förlora sin status som tillväxtmarknad och att degraderas till frontier market. MSCI har emellertid under början av februari bekräftade att Peru kommer att kvarstå bland tillväxtmarknaderna. Risken för nedgradering kvarstår emellertid.

MSCI varnade för nedgradering redan i augusti

MSCI varnade i mitten av augusti 2015 att Peru skulle kunna nedgraderas till frontier market eftersom endast tre värdepapper från landet uppfyllde kravet på storlek och likviditetskravet för tillväxtmarknadsstatus”, enligt Emerging Equity.

Capital Economics säger i en nyligen publicerad analys att företaget räknar med att inflationen i Peru kommer att lätta under det andra kvartalet 2016, men erkänner samtidigt att dagens inflationstakt är högre än de väntat sig. Den skenbara ökningen av inflationsförväntningarna är ett bekymmer och deprecieringen av den peruanska solen, som har minskat med ytterligare tre procent mot dollarn sedan början av året, kommer att lägga tyngd till det redan höga pristrycket i Perus ekonomi.

Capital Economics fortsätter sedan med att säga att den ekonomiska återhämtningen samlar kraft, och att den tidigare prognosen om en höjning av styrräntan med 0,25 procent inte längre gäller längre. Istället räknar Capital Economics med höjningar på 75 punkter under året vilket skulle ta den peruanska styrräntan till fem procent.

Tre saker som håller tillbaka tillväxten i Latinamerika

Tre saker som håller tillbaka tillväxten i Latinamerika

De latinamerikanska valutorna har alla försvagats sedan början av 2014, vilket till stor del kan förklaras av en långsam tillväxt i regionen. Denna trend kommer sannolikt att fortsätta resten av 2015 och en bra bit in under 2016. Nedan har vi listat de tre primära orsakerna till att den ekonomiska tillväxten i Latinamerika inte vill ta fart. Tre saker som håller tillbaka tillväxten i Latinamerika

Lägre råvarupriser. Råvaror prissätts i allmänhet i USD, och den stigande dollarn har lett till fallande priser över hela linjen för jordbruks-, energi- och metallexporten i hela Latinamerika. Det kommer i varierande grad att påverka regionens exportinkomster.

Stora bytesbalansunderskott. I många latinamerikanska länder är handelsunderskott större än historiskt och kan kräva en svagare inhemsk efterfrågan (minus import) för att kompensera för trög eller negativ tillväxt i fråga om exportintäkter.

Stigande inflation. De flesta latinamerikanska ekonomier har upplevt en ökning av inflationen på grund av eftersläpningseffekten av svagare valutor. Detta kan hindra förmågan och viljan hos regionens centralbanker att öka efterfrågan genom att lätta på penningpolitiken och, i vissa fall kan leda till mer restriktiva monetära förhållanden.

Medan de övergripande utsikterna visar på en latinamerikansk tillväxt som är under den potentiella är det viktigt att komma ihåg att regionen är mycket diversifierad och att de olika länderna och deras ekonomier skiljer sig marknat från varandra, till exempel när det gäller tillväxttakt och inflation.

Bland regionens olika ekonomier räknar vi med att Chile, Mexiko och Peru kommer att vara relativa outperformers, medan Colombia kommer att bromsa kraftigt, efter många år av imponerande tillväxt. Slutligen räknar vi med svåra tider för Argentina, Brasilien, och särskilt för Venezuela, där vi räknar med en djup recession med möjlighet till tresiffrig inflation. Låt oss ta en kort titt på varje ekonomi.

Brasilien, stora politiska problem

I början av året var de flesta mer förhoppningsfulla, och såg en möjlighet till en återhämtning som skulle leda till att Brasiliens till skulle ta fart igen under 2015. Prognosen var en real BNP-tillväxt på 1,5 procent enligt undersökning som Banco do Brazil genomförde. Bland de latinamerikanska länderna är Brasilien det land som är mest isolerat från effekterna av fallande råvarupriser. Dessutom hade landets valuta, realen, redan varit utsatt för ett hårt tryck vilket ledde till förhoppningen att Brasilien skulle kunna öka sin export till USA.

Sett i efterhand visade det sig att det var falska förhoppningar, Brasiliens aktiemarknad har rasat, förtroendet för landet är i botten, bland annat efter det att ett antal korrumptionsskandaler har uppdagats och ratinginstituten sänker Brasiliens kreditbetyg titt som tätt. Realens ras har fortsatt ytterligare och Brasiliens befolkning är minst sagt besviken på landets regering.

För den som tror på den brasilianska aktiemarknaden finns det flera börshandlade fonder att välja mellan. Den största är iShares MSCI Brazil Capped (NYSEArca: EWZ)

iShares MSCI Brazil Capped (NYSEArca: EWZ)

Chile, mellan olja och koppar

Chile förefaller att vara på gränsen till en recession, men en svagare chilensk peso kan bidra till att hjälpa till att undvika denna nedgång. Chiles ekonomi har gynnats av kollapsen i oljepriset, men hämmas av nedgången i kopparpriserna. Om kopparpriserna faller ytterligare och oljepriserna återhämtar sig, kan det vara en toxisk mix för Chile som kan leda landets ekonomi i recession. Som sådan förblir Chiles öde till viss del i händerna på den kinesiska marknaden och deras efterfrågan på koppar som är Chiles viktigaste export. Avtagande tillväxt i Kina är dåliga nyheter för chilenare.

För den som tror på den chilenska aktiemarknaden finns det en ETF som heter iShares MSCI Chile Capped ETF (NYSEArca: ECH)

Colombia, har framgångssagan nått sitt slut?

Colombia har varit en av de stora framgångarna i Latinamerika under de senaste 15 åren med fallande inflation och en robust ekonomisk tillväxt som sporrats av dramatiskt lägre nivåer av våld. På lång sikt är de flesta analytiker fortsatt optimistiska till Colombia, men de oroar sig för att tillväxten kommer att minska 2015. Lägre oljepriser har negativa effekter på Colombias ekonomi. En del av detta kommer emellertid att kompenseras av försvagningen av den colombianska peson kontra den amerikanska dollarn.

För den som tror på den colombianska aktiemarknaden finns det flera ETFer att välja mellan, två av dessa börshandlade fonder är Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (NYSEArca: GXG) och iShares MSCI Colombia Capped (NYSEArca: ICOL)

Mexikos långsamma tillväxt förbli långsam

Mexiko tillväxttakt har varit långsam de senaste åren och det verkar sannolikt att förbli långsam under resten av 2015 och en bra bit in på 2016, kanske kan landet nå 1,5 till 2,5 procent tillväxt som bäst. Lyckligtvis är landet inte lika beroende av olja som det en gång var. Kollapsen i oljepriserna verkar kosta mer än en procent i tillväxt men den goda nyheten är att en del av som sannolikt kommer att kompenseras genom fördröjning effekten av en svagare valuta, vilket bör öka exporten till USA, Mexikos främsta handelspartner.

Banco de Mexico gjort ett föredömligt arbete innehålla inflation. Ändå är dess styrränta för närvarande under inflationstakten och det går inte utesluta några räntehöjningar under loppet av 2015, särskilt om den mexikanska peson skulle försvagas ytterligare.

Slutligen, är det frågan om Mexico stabilitet. Nivån och förekomsten av våld gör att många bedömare ifrågasätter regeringens kontroll över stora delar av landet, liksom intresset för vissa regioner Mexiko som ett företags- och turistmål.

För den som tror på den mexikanska aktiemarknaden finns det flera börshandlade fonder att välja mellan. Den största är iShares MSCI Mexico Capped ETF (NYSEArca: EWW)

iShares MSCI Mexico Capped ETF (NYSEArca: EWW)

Peru, potential för en devalvering?

Indexleverantören MSCI hade redan i augusti varnat för att Peru var i fara att förlora sin status som tillväxtmarknad och riskerade att bli degraderad till frontier market beteckningen. Tidigare i oktober bekräftade MSCI emellertid att företaget håller Peru i tillväxtmarknadsgruppen. Indexleverantör sade att risken kvarstår och att Peru kan komma att förlora sin status som tillväxtmarknad.

Perus valuta New Sol har sjunkit i mycket mindre grad än sina latinamerikanska motsvarigheter. Detta är problematiskt med tanke på Perus enorma bytesbalansunderskott, relativt långsam tillväxt och de troliga effekterna av svagare råvarupriser. Den ekonomiska risken bedöms som fortsatt svag, med en tillväxt kring en procentenhet, men med en betydligt högre sannolikhet för en recession.

Med tanke på den inflationsdämpande inverkan av lägre råvarupriser, en relativt stark valuta (för tillfället) och långsam ekonomisk tillväxt, ser vi inte mycket kortsiktig risk för att landets centralbank kommer att införa en åtstramningspolitik.

För den som tror på den peruanska aktiemarknaden finns det en ETF som heter iShares MSCI All Peru Capped ETF (NYSEArca: EPU)

Argentina, vi gråter för Dig

Argentina är ett land som jämt och ständigt ställs inför utmanande förhållanden. En ständigt hög inflation och en centralbank som inte riktigt hinner med, men som försöker strama åt politiken. Argentina hamnade återigen i default, och verkar agera som Latinamerikas Grekland när landets regering är ovilligt att förhandla med sina långivare.

Slutligen, är regeringen med presidenten Cristina Kirchner inblandat i en skandal där en påstådd mörkläggning av iransk inblandning i attacken 18 juli 1994 mot Asociacion Mutual Israelita Argentina i Buenos Aires. Oavsett sanningshalten i dessa påståenden, kan den omgivande kontroversen hämma regeringens förmåga att hantera Argentinas ekonomiska utmaningar.

För den som tror på den argentinska aktiemarknaden finns det en ETF som heter Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (NYSEArca: ARGT)

Venezuela, håll Dig undan

För den som investerar i börshandlade fonder är antagligen Venezuela en av de mer okända av de latinamerikanska länderna, vilket beror på att det inte finns någon landspecifik börshandlad fond som replikerar börsen i detta land.

Venezuelas president Nicolas Maduro befinner sig i en föga avundsvärd situation. Inflationen är skyhög och den reala tillväxten har stagnerat. Officiellt är inflationen runt 70 procent och verkar vara på väg mot 100 procent. Oljepriset, som står för nästan samtliga (96 procent) av Venezuelas exportinkomster, har kollapsat. Valutareserven tar slut så snabbt att centralbanken konverterat ett lån från Kina till valutareserven. I januari besökte Maduro Kina, Qatar och Ryssland att be om lån och stöd för att avvärja en överhängande default på Venezuelas obligationer. Bristen på basvaror gäller allt från toalettpapper till tamponger vilket skapar en social oro.

För att göra det hela ännu mer förvirrat så har Venezuela inte mindre än tre olika officiella valutakurser, det råder skilda växelkurser för olika typer av varor. Officiellt går det cirka 6,3 Bolivars på en dollar, men på den svarta marknaden får Du 175 Bolivars för samma dollar. Under tiden försöker den venzolanska regeringen hantera sitt budgetunderskott genom att trycka nya pengar i en takt som närmast kan jämföras med Weimarrepubliken om än inte i samma skala.

Det finns i dagsläget ingen börshandlad fond som är specifikt inriktad på att replikera utvecklingen för vare sig den venezolanska aktiemarknaden eller för obligationer utgivna av Venezuela, något som blankare världen över beklagar med tanke på hur en sådan ETF skulle ha utvecklats under det senaste året

Venezuela har emellertid en framträdande plats i vissa ETFer som investerar i tillväxtmarknaderobligationer, inklusive iShares Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (NYSEArca: EMHY). EMHY avsätter nästan 11% av sitt kapital på 200 MUSD till investeringar i Venezuelas obligationer, en betydande summa när det oljerika sydamerikanska landet som enligt vissa bedömare är på väg att göra en default.
Avkastningen på två venezuelanska obligationer ligger nära 27 procent. Med en inflation som toppade på nästan 60 procent är kostnaden för kreditswappar som handlare skulle använda för att försäkra sig mot standard på venezuelanska femåriga obligationer nu högre än något annat land, enligt Financial Times.